Reliability, validity, and clinical utility of the Executive Function Performance Test: A measure of executive function in a sample of people with stroke

被引:173
作者
Baum, Carolyn M. [1 ]
Connor, Lisa Tabor [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Morrison, Tracy [4 ]
Hahn, Michelle [1 ]
Dromerick, Alexander W. [5 ,6 ]
Edwards, Dorothy F. [7 ]
机构
[1] Washington Univ, Sch Med, Program Occupat Therapy, St Louis, MO 63108 USA
[2] Washington Univ, Sch Med, Dept Radiol, St Louis, MO USA
[3] Washington Univ, Sch Med, Dept Neurol, St Louis, MO USA
[4] Univ Kansas, Med Ctr, Sch Allied Hlth Occupat Therapy Educ, Kansas City, KS 66103 USA
[5] Georgetown Univ, Sch Med, Washington, DC USA
[6] Natl Rehabil Hosp, Washington, DC USA
[7] Univ Wisconsin, Dept Kinesiol, Madison, WI 53706 USA
关键词
executive function; instrumental activities of daily living; performance assessment; stroke;
D O I
10.5014/ajot.62.4.446
中图分类号
R49 [康复医学];
学科分类号
100215 ;
摘要
This study examined the reliability and validity of the Executive Function Performance Test (EFPT). The EFPT assesses executive function deficits in the performance of real-world tasks. It uses a structured cueing and scoring system to assess higher-level cognitive functions, specifically initiation, organization, sequencing safety and judgment, and task completion. Seventy-three participants with mild to moderate stroke and 22 age- and education-matched controls completed the 4 EFPT tasks (cooking, using the telephone, managing medications, and paying bills). Significant differences were found between participants with mild and moderate stroke and healthy control participants. The EFPT can help occupational therapists determine the level of support needed by people with cognitive impairments to perform complex instrumental tasks. Objective information derived from this assessment is an essential part of the process of determining whether the person can live independently and helping families understand how to support the performance of their family members at home.
引用
收藏
页码:446 / 455
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
[21]   Executive function as a function of sub-clinical psychopathy [J].
Snowden, Robert J. ;
Gray, Nicola S. ;
Pugh, Sally ;
Atkinson, Gemma .
PERSONALITY AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES, 2013, 55 (07) :801-804
[22]   Validity of the Chinese version of the weekly calendar planning activity (WCPA) on assessing executive function in adults with stroke [J].
Gong, Chen ;
Wang, Rongli ;
Wang, Ninghua .
NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL REHABILITATION, 2025, 35 (02) :362-381
[23]   Assessment of executive function in clinical trials [J].
Ylikoski, R ;
Hänninen, T .
INTERNATIONAL PSYCHOGERIATRICS, 2003, 15 :219-224
[24]   Efficacy of Executive Function Interventions After Stroke: A Systematic Review [J].
Poulin, Valerie ;
Korner-Bitensky, Nicol ;
Dawson, Deirdre R. ;
Bherer, Louis .
TOPICS IN STROKE REHABILITATION, 2012, 19 (02) :158-171
[25]   Executive Function Following Child Stroke: The Impact of Lesion Location [J].
Long, Brian ;
Spencer-Smith, Megan M. ;
Jacobs, Rani ;
Mackay, Mark ;
Leventer, Richard ;
Barnes, Chris ;
Anderson, Vicki .
JOURNAL OF CHILD NEUROLOGY, 2011, 26 (03) :279-287
[26]   Exercise and Executive Function in Individuals With Chronic Stroke: A Pilot Study [J].
Kluding, Patricia M. ;
Tseng, Benjamin Y. ;
Billinger, Sandra A. .
JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGIC PHYSICAL THERAPY, 2011, 35 (01) :11-17
[27]   The measurement and impairment of executive function after stroke and concepts for physiotherapy [J].
Hayes, Sara ;
Donnellan, Claire ;
Stokes, Emma .
PHYSICAL THERAPY REVIEWS, 2011, 16 (03) :178-190
[28]   Development of Internet-Based Tasks for the Executive Function Performance Test [J].
Rand, Debbie ;
Ben-Haim, Keren Lee ;
Malka, Rachel ;
Portnoy, Sigal .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL THERAPY, 2018, 72 (02)
[29]   Does Rey Complex Figure Copy Performance Measure Executive Function in Children? [J].
Weber, Rachel C. ;
Riccio, Cynthia A. ;
Cohen, Morris J. .
APPLIED NEUROPSYCHOLOGY-CHILD, 2013, 2 (01) :6-12
[30]   Assessment of executive function using the Tinkertoy test [J].
Lambert, Maude ;
Stenger, Janet ;
Bielajew, Catherine .
BEHAVIOURAL PHARMACOLOGY, 2018, 29 (08) :709-715