A Comparative Study of the Application of Different Commercial Software for Topology Optimization

被引:20
作者
Tyflopoulos, Evangelos [1 ]
Steinert, Martin [1 ]
机构
[1] Norwegian Univ Sci & Technol NTNU, Dept Mech & Ind Engn, N-7491 Trondheim, Norway
来源
APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL | 2022年 / 12卷 / 02期
关键词
topology optimization; commercial software; design; lightweighting; DESIGN; CODE;
D O I
10.3390/app12020611
中图分类号
O6 [化学];
学科分类号
0703 ;
摘要
Topology optimization (TO) has been a popular design method among CAD designers in the last decades. This method optimizes the given design domain by minimizing/maximizing one or more objective functions, such as the structure's stiffness, and at the same time, respecting the given constraints like the volume or the weight reduction. For this reason, the companies providing the commercial CAD/FEM platforms have taken this design trend into account and, thus, have included TO in their products over the last years. However, it is not clear which features, algorithms, or, in other words, possibilities the CAD designers do have using these software platforms. A comparative study among the most applied topology optimization software was conducted for this research paper. First, the authors developed an online database of the identified TO software in the form of a table. Interested CAD designers can access and edit its content, contributing in this way to the creation of an updated library of the available TO software. In addition, a deeper comparison among three commercial software platforms-SolidWorks, ANSYS Mechanical, and ABAQUS-was implemented using three common case studies-(1) a bell crank lever, (2) a pillow bracket, and (3) a small bridge. These models were designed, optimized, and validated numerically, as well as compared for their strength. Finally, the above software was evaluated with respect to optimization time, optimized designs, and TO possibilities and features.
引用
收藏
页数:23
相关论文
共 114 条
  • [1] Interactive topology optimization on hand-held devices
    Aage, Niels
    Nobel-Jorgensen, Morten
    Andreasen, Casper Schousboe
    Sigmund, Ole
    [J]. STRUCTURAL AND MULTIDISCIPLINARY OPTIMIZATION, 2013, 47 (01) : 1 - 6
  • [2] Agarwal D., 2019, COMPUT AIDED APPL, V16, P703, DOI [10.14733/cadaps.2019.703-719, DOI 10.14733/CADAPS.2019.703-719]
  • [3] Ali MH, 2018, PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2018 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ADVANCED MANUFACTURING (IEEE ICAM), P365, DOI 10.1109/AMCON.2018.8614886
  • [4] A level-set method for shape optimization
    Allaire, G
    Jouve, F
    Toader, AM
    [J]. COMPTES RENDUS MATHEMATIQUE, 2002, 334 (12) : 1125 - 1130
  • [5] Allaire G., 2012, SCILAB CODE MANUAL
  • [6] Allaire G., ALLAIRE SCILAB
  • [7] Level set topology and shape optimization by density methods using cut elements with length scale control
    Andreasen, Casper Schousboe
    Elingaard, Martin Ohrt
    Aage, Niels
    [J]. STRUCTURAL AND MULTIDISCIPLINARY OPTIMIZATION, 2020, 62 (02) : 685 - 707
  • [8] Efficient topology optimization in MATLAB using 88 lines of code
    Andreassen, Erik
    Clausen, Anders
    Schevenels, Mattias
    Lazarov, Boyan S.
    Sigmund, Ole
    [J]. STRUCTURAL AND MULTIDISCIPLINARY OPTIMIZATION, 2011, 43 (01) : 1 - 16
  • [9] [Anonymous], 2013, P 15 IEEE WORKSH CON
  • [10] [Anonymous], 2008, INTRO STRUCTURAL OPT