Factors predicting maintenance of sinus rhythm after direct current cardioversion of atrial fibrillation and flutter: A reanalysis with recently acquired data

被引:26
作者
Arnar, DO [1 ]
Danielsen, R [1 ]
机构
[1] LANDSPITALINN UNIV HOSP,DEPT MED,DIV CARDIOL,IS-101 REYKJAVIK,ICELAND
关键词
atrial arrhythmias; cardioversion; direct current; xray; chest; echocardiography;
D O I
10.1159/000177084
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
A prospective study was conducted to evaluate how many patients maintain normal sinus rhythm after direct current (DC) cardioversion of atrial arrhythmias and to assess factors predictive of long-term success. The study group consisted of 61 patients (45 men) aged 18-88 years (mean age 66 +/- 11 years) who underwent cardioversion at our department from October 1990 to June 1992. Prior to cardioversion, the patients' medical history, medications, heart size on chest X ray, and echocardiographic findings were reviewed. Overall, 41 (67.2%) patients were in atrial fibrillation, while 20 (32.8%) had atrial flutter. Only 15% of the patients had valvular heart disease. Sinus rhythm was restored by DC cardioversion in 47 (77%) patients, none of whom experienced an embolic event prior to discharge. Patients with atrial flutter had a higher conversion rate (95%) than those in atrial fibrillation (68.3%; p = 0.024), and also patients with an arrhythmia for less than 1 week (94.4%) compared to those with a longer or unknown duration (69.8%; p = 0.047). The primary success rate was not influenced by heart size on chest X ray or echocardiographic variables. The study protocol aimed at following up the patients for 1 year after cardioversion. Of the 47 patients who converted to sinus rhythm data are available on 44 for a mean follow-up of 11 +/- 3 months (range 1-14 months), at which time 25 (57%) still remained in sinus rhythm. Heart size on the chest X ray was significantly increased in the group that did not maintain sinus rhythm (p = 0.03) and their left atrial size on echocardiography was slightly increased (p = 0.10). Patients who originally had atrial flutter were more likely to remain in sinus rhythm than those who had been in atrial fibrillation (p = 0.12), as did patients with an arrhythmia for less than 1 week prior to cardioversion in comparison to those with a longer or unknown duration (p = 0.11). Thus, in contrast to previous reports, according to these recent data on a patient population with a low prevalence of valvular heart disease, DC cardioversion can be attempted in most patients with atrial tachyarrhythmias. Clinical factors, heart size on chest X ray and echocardiographic findings should, however, be considered before deciding to perform DC cardioversion.
引用
收藏
页码:181 / 188
页数:8
相关论文
共 38 条
[21]   SOTALOL VERSUS QUINIDINE FOR THE MAINTENANCE OF SINUS RHYTHM AFTER DIRECT-CURRENT CONVERSION OF ATRIAL-FIBRILLATION [J].
JUULMOLLER, S ;
EDVARDSSON, N ;
REHNQVISTAHLBERG, N .
CIRCULATION, 1990, 82 (06) :1932-1939
[22]   EPIDEMIOLOGIC FEATURES OF CHRONIC ATRIAL-FIBRILLATION - THE FRAMINGHAM-STUDY [J].
KANNEL, WB ;
ABBOTT, RD ;
SAVAGE, DD ;
MCNAMARA, PM .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1982, 306 (17) :1018-1022
[23]   SELF-ADHESIVE PREAPPLIED ELECTRODE PADS FOR DEFIBRILLATION AND CARDIOVERSION [J].
KERBER, RE ;
MARTINS, JB ;
KELLY, KJ ;
FERGUSON, DW ;
KOUBA, C ;
JENSEN, SR ;
NEWMAN, B ;
PARKE, JD ;
KIESO, R ;
MELTON, J .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 1984, 3 (03) :815-820
[24]   VERAPAMIL AND DIGOXIN - THEIR RESPECTIVE EFFECTS ON ATRIAL-FIBRILLATION AND THEIR INTERACTION [J].
KLEIN, HO ;
KAPLINSKY, E .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 1982, 50 (04) :894-902
[25]  
LUNDSTROM T, 1988, ACTA MED SCAND, V223, P53
[26]   ELECTRICAL CONVERSION OF ATRIAL FIBRILLATION - IMMEDIATE AND LONG-TERM RESULTS AND SELECTION OF PATIENTS [J].
MORRIS, JJ ;
PETER, RH ;
MCINTOSH, HD .
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1966, 65 (02) :216-+
[27]  
PETERSEN P, 1989, LANCET, V1, P175
[28]   LOW-ENERGY CONVERSION OF ATRIAL-FIBRILLATION IN THE SHEEP [J].
POWELL, AC ;
GARAN, H ;
MCGOVERN, BA ;
FALLON, JT ;
KRISHNAN, SC ;
RUSKIN, JN .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 1992, 20 (03) :707-711
[29]   PROPAFENONE VERSUS SOTALOL FOR SUPPRESSION OF RECURRENT SYMPTOMATIC ATRIAL-FIBRILLATION [J].
REIMOLD, SC ;
CANTILLON, CO ;
FRIEDMAN, PL ;
ANTMAN, EM .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 1993, 71 (07) :558-563
[30]  
SODERMARK T, 1975, BRIT HEART J, V37, P486