Septal Flash as a Predictor of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Response: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

被引:3
作者
Bennett, Sadie [1 ]
Tafuro, Jacopo [1 ]
Duckett, Simon [1 ]
Heatlie, Grant [1 ]
Patwala, Ashish [1 ]
Barker, Diane [1 ]
Cubukcu, Arzu [2 ]
Ahmed, Fozia [3 ]
Kwok, Chun [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hosp North Midlands NHS Trust, Royal Stoke Univ Hosp, Heart & Lung Clin, Dept Cardiol, Stoke On Trent, Staffs, England
[2] Macclesfield Hosp, Dept Cardiol, Macclesfield, Cheshire, England
[3] Univ Manchester, Fac Biol Med & Hlth, Div Cardiovasc Sci, Manchester, Lancs, England
[4] Keele Univ, Primary Care & Hlth Sci, Keele, Staffs, England
关键词
Cardiac dyssynchrony; cardiac resynchronization therapy; septal dyssynchrony; septal flash; LEFT-VENTRICULAR DYSSYNCHRONY; CONGESTIVE-HEART-FAILURE; LONG-TERM SURVIVAL; ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY;
D O I
10.4103/jcecho.jcecho_45_21
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) in heart failure patients has been shown to improve patient outcomes in some but not all patients. A few studies have identified that septal flash on imaging is associated with response to CRT, but there has yet to be systematic review to evaluate the consistency of the finding across the literature. A search of MEDLINE and EMBASE was conducted to identify studies, which evaluate septal flash and its association with CRT response. Studies that met the inclusion criteria were statistically pooled with random-effects meta-analysis and heterogeneity was assessed using the I2 statistic. A total of nine studies were included with 2307 participants (mean age 76 years, 67% male). Septal flash on imaging before CRT implantation was seen in 53% of patients and the proportion of CRT responders from the included studies varied from 52% to 77%. In patients who were CRT responders, septal flash was seen in 40% of patients compared to 10% in those deemed to be CRT nonresponders. Meta-analysis of eight of the nine included studies suggests that the presence of septal flash at preimplant was associated with an increased likelihood of CRT response (relative risk 2.55 95% confidence interval 2.04-3.19, P < 0.001, I2 = 51%). Septal flash was also reported to be associated with left ventricular reverse remodeling, but the association with survival and symptomatic improvement was less clear. Septal flash is a well-defined and distinctive contraction pattern that is easily recognizable on cardiac imaging. Septal flash may be associated with CRT response and should be evaluated in the patients that are considered for CRT devices.
引用
收藏
页码:198 / +
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Leadless left ventricular endocardial pacing for cardiac resynchronization therapy: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Wijesuriya, Nadeev
    Elliott, Mark K.
    Mehta, Vishal
    Sidhu, Baldeep S.
    Behar, Jonathan M.
    Niederer, Steven
    Rinaldi, Christopher A.
    HEART RHYTHM, 2022, 19 (07) : 1176 - 1183
  • [32] Time-trend treatment effect of cardiac resynchronization therapy with or without defibrillator on mortality: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Veres, Boglarka
    Fehervari, Peter
    Engh, Marie Anne
    Hegyi, Peter
    Gharehdaghi, Sara
    Zima, Endre
    Duray, Gabor
    Merkely, Bela
    Kosztin, Annamaria
    EUROPACE, 2023, 25 (10):
  • [33] Targeted left ventricular lead positioning to the site of latest activation in cardiac resynchronization therapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Fyenbo, Daniel Benjamin
    Bjerre, Henrik Laurits
    Frausing, Maria Hee Jung Park
    Stephansen, Charlotte
    Sommer, Anders
    Borgquist, Rasmus
    Bakos, Zoltan
    Glikson, Michael
    Milman, Anat
    Beinart, Roy
    Kockova, Radka
    Sedlacek, Kamil
    Wichterle, Dan
    Saba, Samir
    Jain, Sandeep
    Shalaby, Alaa
    Kronborg, Mads Brix
    Nielsen, Jens Cosedis
    EUROPACE, 2023, 25 (09):
  • [34] Modalities of ventricular pacing for cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients with heart failure: a meta-analysis and systematic review
    Chen, Ailan
    Chen, Xinyu
    Shen, Yuechun
    Li, Wanglin
    ARCHIVES OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2017, 13 (05) : 1006 - 1017
  • [35] Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in Inotrope-Dependent Heart Failure Patients A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Hernandez, Gabriel A.
    Blumer, Vanessa
    Arcay, Luis
    Monge, Jorge
    Viles-Gonzalez, Juan F.
    Lindenfeld, JoAnn
    Goldberger, Jeffrey J.
    Chaparro, Sandra
    JACC-HEART FAILURE, 2018, 6 (09) : 734 - 742
  • [36] Global longitudinal strain predicts responders after cardiac resynchronization therapy—a systematic review and meta-analysis
    George Bazoukis
    Costas Thomopoulos
    Gary Tse
    Konstantinos Tsioufis
    Petros Nihoyannopoulos
    Heart Failure Reviews, 2022, 27 : 827 - 836
  • [37] Association between frailty and adverse outcomes after cardiac resynchronization therapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Li, Xiaowang
    Fang, Fei
    EUROPEAN GERIATRIC MEDICINE, 2025, 16 (01) : 165 - 177
  • [38] De novo implantation vs. upgrade cardiac resynchronization therapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Annamaria Kosztin
    Mate Vamos
    Daniel Aradi
    Walter Richard Schwertner
    Attila Kovacs
    Klaudia Vivien Nagy
    Endre Zima
    Laszlo Geller
    Gabor Zoltan Duray
    Valentina Kutyifa
    Bela Merkely
    Heart Failure Reviews, 2018, 23 : 15 - 26
  • [39] Endocardial left ventricular pacing for cardiac resynchronization: systematic review and meta-analysis
    Gamble, James Hugo Phillimore
    Herring, Neil
    Ginks, Matthew
    Rajappan, Kim
    Bashir, Yaver
    Betts, Timothy Rider
    EUROPACE, 2018, 20 (01): : 73 - 81
  • [40] Predictors of response to cardiac resynchronization therapy: A systematic review
    Rickard, John
    Michtalik, Henry
    Sharma, Ritu
    Berger, Zackary
    Iyoha, Emmanuel
    Green, Ariel R.
    Haq, Nowreen
    Robinson, Karen A.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2016, 225 : 345 - 352