Role of data from cost and other economic analyses in healthcare decision-making for HIV, TB and sexual/reproductive health programmes in South Africa

被引:1
作者
Murphy, Joshua P. [1 ]
Kgowedi, Sharon [1 ]
Naidoo, Nalini [1 ]
Girdwood, Sarah [1 ]
Jamieson, Lise [1 ]
Soeteman, Djora [2 ]
Resch, Stephen [2 ]
Meyer-Rath, Gesine [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Witwatersrand, Hlth Econ & Epidemiol Res Off HE2RO, 39 Empire Rd, ZA-2193 Johannesburg, South Africa
[2] Harvard TH Chan Sch Publ Hlth, Ctr Hlth Decis Sci, 718 Huntington Ave, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[3] Boston Univ, Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Global Hlth, 801 Massachusetts Ave, Boston, MA 02118 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
Health economics; decision-making; budgeting; South Africa; interviews; cost data;
D O I
10.1093/heapol/czab071
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
An increasing focus on the use of the results of cost analyses and other economic evaluations in health programme decision-making by governments, donors and technical support partners working in low- and middle-income countries is accompanied by recognition that this use is impeded by several factors, including the lack of skills, data and coordination between spheres of the government. We describe our experience generating economic evaluation data for human immunodeficiency virus, tuberculosis and sexual/reproductive health programmes in South Africa alongside the results of a series of in-depth interviews (IDIs) among decision-makers within the South African government and implementing organizations (data users) and producers of economic evaluations (data producers). We summarize results across (1) the process of implementing a new intervention; (2) barriers to the use of cost data and suggested solutions and (3) the transferability of experiences to the planned South African implementation of universal health coverage (UHC). Based on our experience and the IDIs, we suggest concrete steps towards the improvement of economic data use in the planning and the establishment of structures mandated under the transition to UHC. Our key recommendations include the following: (1) compile a publicly available and regularly updated in-country cost repository; (2) increase the availability of programmatic outcomes data at the aggregate level; (3) agree upon and implement a set of primary decision criteria for the adoption and funding of interventions; (4) combine the efforts of health economics institutions into a stringent system for health technology assessments and (5) improve the link between national and provincial planning and budgeting.
引用
收藏
页码:1545 / 1551
页数:7
相关论文
共 14 条
[11]   Foreword: Health Economic Evaluations in Low- and Middle-income Countries: Methodological Issues and Challenges for Priority Setting [J].
Pitt, Catherine ;
Vassall, Anna ;
Teerawattananon, Yot ;
Griffiths, Ulla K. ;
Guinness, Lorna ;
Walker, Damian ;
Foster, Nicola ;
Hanson, Kara .
HEALTH ECONOMICS, 2016, 25 :1-5
[12]  
Richards L., 2015, Handling qualitative data: A practical guide, V3rd
[13]  
South Africa Department of Health, 2017, NATL HLTH INSURANCE
[14]  
Vassall A., 2018, Reference Case for Estimating the Costs of Global Health Services and Interventions2017