Turkish and Moroccan Dutch women's views of using a self-sampling kit for human papillomavirus testing as a tool for cervical cancer screening: What are the barriers and the motivators?

被引:1
|
作者
Hilverda, Femke [1 ]
Fissers, Katleen [1 ]
van den Broek, Thijs [1 ]
机构
[1] Erasmus Univ, Erasmus Sch Hlth Policy & Management, Dept Sociomed Sci, POB 1738, NL-3000 DR Rotterdam, Netherlands
关键词
cervical cancer screening; HPV; self-sampling; theory of planned behavior; Turkish and Moroccan Dutch women; FOCUS GROUPS; NON-ATTENDANCE; VACCINE UPTAKE; RISK; NETHERLANDS; PROGRAMS; BEHAVIOR; REASONS;
D O I
10.1177/17455065211065873
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective: This study explores barriers and motivators to use self-sampling kits for human papillomavirus testing for cervical cancer screening as perceived by Dutch women of Turkish and Moroccan origin living in the Netherlands. Methods: A total of II in-depth semi-structured interviews were conducted and structured according to the theory of planned behavior. Results: Findings suggest that self-sampling may lift important barriers hampering traditional cervical cancer screening, such as those related to shame and chastity. However, self-sampling raises its own barriers too. Most importantly, some women fear that self-sampling may harm virginity. Some women also do not feel confident about their ability to properly use the self-sampling kit, but fears about the inability to properly use it often fade away upon having seen the self-sampling kit. Moreover, results show that knowledge about cervical cancer and its origin is limited, which may undermine women's willingness to participate in a screening program. Conclusions: These results suggest that communication strategies to encourage using self-sampling kits among women of Turkish and Moroccan origin could benefit from culturally sensitive approaches, for example, by placing emphasis on issues such as virginity and chastity. Consistent with a recent advice of the Health Council of the Netherlands, the kit could furthermore be sent to eligible women as a standard procedure, rather than upon request. This could reduce hassle and doubts about women's ability to use the self-sampling kit. Finally, educating women about the importance of screening to prevent cervical cancer is needed to foster informed decision-making.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Acceptability of vaginal self-sampling with high-risk human papillomavirus testing for cervical cancer screening: a French questionnaire-based study
    Bertucci, Martina
    Bonnet, Emmanuel
    Satger, Laura
    Kreiche, Antoine
    Chappert, Jean-Loup
    Loy-Morel, Silvia
    Segondy, Michel
    Daures, Jean Pierre
    Boulle, Nathalie
    WOMEN & HEALTH, 2021, 61 (01) : 83 - 94
  • [32] Shanxi Province cervical cancer screening study II: Self-sampling for high-risk human papillomavirus compared to direct sampling for human papillomavirus and liquid based cervical cytology
    Belinson, JL
    Qiao, YL
    Pretorius, RG
    Zhang, WH
    Rong, SD
    Huang, MN
    Zhao, FH
    Wu, LY
    Ren, SD
    Huang, RD
    Washington, MF
    Pan, QJ
    Li, L
    Fife, D
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER, 2003, 13 (06) : 819 - 826
  • [33] Sociodemographic Characteristics and Screening Outcomes of Women Preferring Self-Sampling in the Dutch Cervical Cancer Screening Programme: A Population-Based Study
    Aitken, Clare A.
    Inturrisi, Federica
    Kaljouw, Sylvia
    Nieboer, Daan
    Siebers, Albert G.
    Melchers, Willem J. G.
    van den Brule, Adriaan J. C.
    Molijn, Anco
    Hinrichs, John W. J.
    Niesters, Hubert G. M.
    van Kemenade, Folkert J.
    Berkhof, Johannes
    de Kok, Inge M. C. M.
    CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY BIOMARKERS & PREVENTION, 2023, 32 (02) : 183 - 192
  • [34] Determinants of women’s likelihood of vaginal self-sampling for human papillomavirus to screen for cervical cancer in Taiwan: a cross-sectional study
    Shu-Ling Chen
    Pao-Chun Hsieh
    Chia-Hui Chou
    Ya-Ling Tzeng
    BMC Women's Health, 14
  • [35] Determinants of women's likelihood of vaginal self-sampling for human papillomavirus to screen for cervical cancer in Taiwan: a cross-sectional study
    Chen, Shu-Ling
    Hsieh, Pao-Chun
    Chou, Chia-Hui
    Tzeng, Ya-Ling
    BMC WOMENS HEALTH, 2014, 14
  • [36] Health care personnel's perspectives on human papillomavirus (HPV) self-sampling for cervical cancer screening: a pre-implementation, qualitative study
    Xiong, Serena
    Lazovich, De Ann
    Hassan, Faiza
    Ambo, Nafisa
    Ghebre, Rahel
    Kulasingam, Shalini
    Mason, Susan M.
    Pratt, Rebekah J.
    IMPLEMENTATION SCIENCE COMMUNICATIONS, 2022, 3 (01):
  • [37] "It's cancer screening after all". Barriers to cervical and colorectal cancer screening and attitudes to promotion of self-sampling kits upon attendance for breast cancer screening
    Kirkegaard, Pia
    Larsen, Mette Bach
    Andersen, Berit
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCREENING, 2023, 30 (02) : 74 - 80
  • [38] Effect of Patient Characteristics on Uptake of Screening Using a Mailed Human Papillomavirus Self-sampling Kit A Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial
    Winer, Rachel L.
    Lin, John
    Tiro, Jasmin A.
    Miglioretti, Diana L.
    Beatty, Tara
    Gao, Hongyuan
    Kimbel, Kilian
    Thayer, Chris
    Buist, Diana S. M.
    JAMA NETWORK OPEN, 2022, 5 (11)
  • [39] Comparative performance of novel self-sampling methods in detecting high-risk human papillomavirus in 30,130 women not attending cervical screening
    Bosgraaf, Remko P.
    Verhoef, Viola M. J.
    Massuger, Leon F. A. G.
    Siebers, Albert G.
    Bulten, Johan
    de Kuyper-de Ridder, Gabrielle M.
    Meijer, Chris J. M.
    Snijders, Peter J. F.
    Heideman, Danielle A. M.
    IntHout, Joanna
    van Kemenade, Folkert J.
    Melchers, Willem J. G.
    Bekkers, Ruud L. M.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2015, 136 (03) : 646 - 655
  • [40] Women’s intentions to self-collect samples for human papillomavirus testing in an organized cervical cancer screening program
    Laurie W Smith
    Fareeza Khurshed
    Dirk J van Niekerk
    Mel Krajden
    Sandra B Greene
    Suzanne Hobbs
    Andrew J Coldman
    Eduardo L Franco
    Gina S Ogilvie
    BMC Public Health, 14