Reduced feather growth rates of two common birds inhabiting central Amazonian forest fragments

被引:36
作者
Stratford, JA
Stouffer, PC
机构
[1] Auburn Univ, Dept Biol Sci, Auburn, AL 36849 USA
[2] SE Louisiana Univ, Dept Biol Sci, Hammond, LA 70402 USA
[3] Inst Nacl de Pesquisas da Amazonia, Biol Dynam Forest Fragments Project, BR-69011 Manaus, Amazonas, Brazil
关键词
D O I
10.1046/j.1523-1739.2001.015003721.x
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
Forest fragmentation may negatively affect populations typically found within continuous forest tracts Some effects, such as absence from small fragments, are obvious, but other effects may be subtle and easily overlooked. We evaluated the hypothesis that forest birds dwelling in fragments, where microclimatic conditions have been shown to be hotter, and drier than in continuous forest, may be in poorer physiological condition than those in the forest interior We studied two bird species, the Wedge-billed Woodcreeper (Glyphorynchus spirurus) and the White-crowned Manakin (Pipra pipra), common to the fragmented landscape north of Manaus, Brazil We analyzed feather growth rates in Pipra and Glyphorynchus captured in 1-, 10-, and 100-ha forest fragments and continuous forest. Mean daily feather growth rates of the outer right rectrix of birds captured in fragments were significantly slower than feather growth rates of birds captured in continuous forest. Based on recapture data, Wedge-billed Woodcreepers probably grew their feathers in sites where they were first captured. White-crowned Manakins, however were highly mobile and were recaptured rarely. Although ute cannot conclusively show that fragmentation caused birds to be in poorer physiological condition, the data indicate that birds in poorer physiological condition were more likely to be captured in fragments than in continuous forest. Thus our data suggest that forest fragmentation may have subtle but important effects on species that are relatively common after landscape alteration.
引用
收藏
页码:721 / 728
页数:8
相关论文
共 73 条
[31]  
KARR JR, 1981, STUDIES AVIAN BIOL, V6, P548
[32]   AVIAN USE OF HABITAT CONFIGURATIONS CREATED BY FOREST CUTTING IN SOUTHEASTERN WYOMING [J].
KELLER, ME ;
ANDERSON, SH .
CONDOR, 1992, 94 (01) :55-65
[33]  
LECK CF, 1979, AUK, V96, P343
[34]   TROPICAL WET FOREST TREEFALL GAPS AND DISTRIBUTIONS OF UNDERSTORY BIRDS AND PLANTS [J].
LEVEY, DJ .
ECOLOGY, 1988, 69 (04) :1076-1089
[35]   ANNUAL VARIATION IN BIRDS AND PLANTS OF A TROPICAL 2ND-GROWTH WOODLAND [J].
LOISELLE, BA ;
BLAKE, JG .
CONDOR, 1994, 96 (02) :368-380
[36]  
Lovejoy T.E., 1990, P60
[37]  
Lovejoy T.E., 1986, P257
[38]   EFFECTS OF FOREST FRAGMENTATION ON BREEDING BIRD COMMUNITIES IN MARYLAND, USA [J].
LYNCH, JF ;
WHIGHAM, DF .
BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION, 1984, 28 (04) :287-324
[39]   EDGE EFFECTS IN CENTRAL AMAZONIAN FOREST FRAGMENTS [J].
MALCOLM, JR .
ECOLOGY, 1994, 75 (08) :2438-2445
[40]   DISPERSAL DISTANCES OF NUTHATCHES, SITTA-EUROPAEA, IN A HIGHLY FRAGMENTED FOREST HABITAT [J].
MATTHYSEN, E ;
ADRIAENSEN, F ;
DHONDT, AA .
OIKOS, 1995, 72 (03) :375-381