Intra- and inter-fraction relative range verification in heavy-ion therapy using filtered interaction vertex imaging

被引:4
作者
Hymers, Devin [1 ]
Kasanda, Eva [1 ]
Bildstein, Vinzenz [1 ]
Easter, Joelle [1 ]
Richard, Andrea [2 ,3 ]
Spyrou, Artemis [2 ]
Hohr, Cornelia [4 ]
Mucher, Dennis [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Guelph, Dept Phys, Guelph, ON, Canada
[2] Michigan State Univ, Natl Superconducting Cyclotron Lab, E Lansing, MI 48824 USA
[3] Lawrence Livermore Natl Lab, Livermore, CA 94550 USA
[4] TRIUMF, Vancouver, BC, Canada
基金
美国国家科学基金会; 加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会;
关键词
interaction vertex imaging; heavy-ion therapy; silicon detectors; range monitoring; RADIOTHERAPY; BEAMS; MODEL; IMPLEMENTATION; PROSTATE;
D O I
10.1088/1361-6560/ac3b33
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
Heavy-ion therapy, particularly using scanned (active) beam delivery, provides a precise and highly conformal dose distribution, with maximum dose deposition for each pencil beam at its endpoint (Bragg peak), and low entrance and exit dose. To take full advantage of this precision, robust range verification methods are required; these methods ensure that the Bragg peak is positioned correctly in the patient and the dose is delivered as prescribed. Relative range verification allows intra-fraction monitoring of Bragg peak spacing to ensure full coverage with each fraction, as well as inter-fraction monitoring to ensure all fractions are delivered consistently. To validate the proposed filtered interaction vertex imaging (IVI) method for relative range verification, a O-16 beam was used to deliver 12 Bragg peak positions in a 40 mm poly-(methyl methacrylate) phantom. Secondary particles produced in the phantom were monitored using position-sensitive silicon detectors. Events recorded on these detectors, along with a measurement of the treatment beam axis, were used to reconstruct the sites of origin of these secondary particles in the phantom. The distal edge of the depth distribution of these reconstructed points was determined with logistic fits, and the translation in depth required to minimize the chi (2) statistic between these fits was used to compute the range shift between any two Bragg peak positions. In all cases, the range shift was determined with sub-millimeter precision, to a standard deviation of the mean of 220(10) mu m. This result validates filtered IVI as a reliable relative range verification method, which should be capable of monitoring each energy step in each fraction of a scanned heavy-ion treatment plan.
引用
收藏
页数:20
相关论文
共 38 条
  • [1] GEANT4-a simulation toolkit
    Agostinelli, S
    Allison, J
    Amako, K
    Apostolakis, J
    Araujo, H
    Arce, P
    Asai, M
    Axen, D
    Banerjee, S
    Barrand, G
    Behner, F
    Bellagamba, L
    Boudreau, J
    Broglia, L
    Brunengo, A
    Burkhardt, H
    Chauvie, S
    Chuma, J
    Chytracek, R
    Cooperman, G
    Cosmo, G
    Degtyarenko, P
    Dell'Acqua, A
    Depaola, G
    Dietrich, D
    Enami, R
    Feliciello, A
    Ferguson, C
    Fesefeldt, H
    Folger, G
    Foppiano, F
    Forti, A
    Garelli, S
    Giani, S
    Giannitrapani, R
    Gibin, D
    Cadenas, JJG
    González, I
    Abril, GG
    Greeniaus, G
    Greiner, W
    Grichine, V
    Grossheim, A
    Guatelli, S
    Gumplinger, P
    Hamatsu, R
    Hashimoto, K
    Hasui, H
    Heikkinen, A
    Howard, A
    [J]. NUCLEAR INSTRUMENTS & METHODS IN PHYSICS RESEARCH SECTION A-ACCELERATORS SPECTROMETERS DETECTORS AND ASSOCIATED EQUIPMENT, 2003, 506 (03) : 250 - 303
  • [2] Radiotherapy with beams of carbon ions
    Amaldi, U
    Kraft, G
    [J]. REPORTS ON PROGRESS IN PHYSICS, 2005, 68 (08) : 1861 - 1882
  • [3] Present challenges in hadrontherapy techniques
    Amaldi, U.
    Braccini, S.
    [J]. EUROPEAN PHYSICAL JOURNAL PLUS, 2011, 126 (07): : 1 - 15
  • [4] Advanced Quality Assurance for CNAO
    Amaldi, U.
    Hajdas, W.
    Iliescu, S.
    Malakhov, N.
    Samarati, J.
    Sauli, F.
    Watts, D.
    [J]. NUCLEAR INSTRUMENTS & METHODS IN PHYSICS RESEARCH SECTION A-ACCELERATORS SPECTROMETERS DETECTORS AND ASSOCIATED EQUIPMENT, 2010, 617 (1-3) : 248 - 249
  • [5] Dosimetric consequences of intrafraction prostate motion in scanned ion beam radiotherapy
    Ammazzalorso, Filippo
    Graef, Sebastian
    Weber, Uli
    Wittig, Andrea
    Engenhart-Cabillic, Rita
    Jelen, Urszula
    [J]. RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2014, 112 (01) : 100 - 105
  • [6] Estimating the demand for radiotherapy from the evidence: A review of changes from 2003 to 2012
    Barton, Michael B.
    Jacob, Susannah
    Shafiq, Jesmin
    Wong, Karen
    Thompson, Stephen R.
    Hanna, Timothy P.
    Delaney, Geoff P.
    [J]. RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2014, 112 (01) : 140 - 144
  • [7] Projected estimates of cancer in Canada in 2020
    Brenner, Darren R.
    Weir, Hannah K.
    Demers, Alain A.
    Ellison, Larry F.
    Louzado, Cheryl
    Shaw, Amanda
    Turner, Donna
    Woods, Ryan R.
    Smith, Leah M.
    [J]. CANADIAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION JOURNAL, 2020, 192 (09) : E199 - E205
  • [8] ROOT - An object oriented data analysis framework
    Brun, R
    Rademakers, F
    [J]. NUCLEAR INSTRUMENTS & METHODS IN PHYSICS RESEARCH SECTION A-ACCELERATORS SPECTROMETERS DETECTORS AND ASSOCIATED EQUIPMENT, 1997, 389 (1-2) : 81 - 86
  • [9] Dose quantification from in-beam positron emission tomography
    Enghardt, W
    Parodi, K
    Crespo, P
    Fiedler, F
    Pawelke, J
    Pönisch, F
    [J]. RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2004, 73 : S96 - S98
  • [10] Experimental verification of a non-invasive method to monitor the lateral pencil beam position in an anthropomorphic phantom for carbon-ion radiotherapy
    Felix-Bautista, R.
    Gehrke, T.
    Ghesquiere-Dierickx, L.
    Reimold, M.
    Amato, C.
    Turecek, D.
    Jakubek, J.
    Ellerbrock, M.
    Martisikova, M.
    [J]. PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2019, 64 (17)