Transvalvular Flow Rate Determines Prognostic Value of Aortic Valve Area in Aortic Stenosis

被引:68
|
作者
Namasivayam, Mayooran [1 ]
He, Wei [1 ]
Churchill, Timothy W. [1 ]
Capoulade, Romain [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Liu, Shiying [1 ]
Lee, Hang [1 ]
Danik, Jacqueline S. [1 ]
Picard, Michael H. [1 ]
Pibarot, Philippe [3 ]
Levine, Robert A. [1 ]
Hung, Judy [1 ]
机构
[1] Harvard Med Sch, Massachusetts Gen Hosp, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[2] Univ Nantes, CHU Nantes, CNRS, INSERM,Inst Thorax, F-44000 Nantes, France
[3] Laval Univ, Quebec Heart & Lung Inst, Quebec City, PQ, Canada
基金
加拿大健康研究院;
关键词
aortic stenosis; flow rate; low flow; low gradient; outcome; prognosis; SYSTOLIC-TIME INTERVALS; EXERCISE; DISEASE;
D O I
10.1016/j.jacc.2020.02.046
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND Aortic valve area (AVA) <= 1.0 cm(2) is a defining characteristic of severe aortic stenosis (AS). AVA can be underestimated at low transvalvular flow rate. Yet, the impact of flow rate on prognostic value of AVA <= 1.0 cm(2) is unknown and is not incorporated into AS assessment. OBJECTIVES This study aimed to evaluate the effect of flow rate on prognostic value of AVA in AS. METHODS In total, 1,131 patients with moderate or severe AS and complete clinical follow-up were included as part of a longitudinal database. The effect of flow rate (ratio of stroke volume to ejection time) on prognostic value of AVA <= 1.0 cm(2) for time to death was evaluated, adjusting for confounders. Sensitivity analysis was performed to identify the optimal cutoff for prognostic threshold of AVA. The findings were validated in a separate external longitudinal cohort of 939 patients. RESULTS Flow rate had a significant effect on prognostic value of AVA. AVA <= 1.0 cm(2) was not prognostic for mortality (p = 0.15) if AVA was measured at flow rates below median (<= 242 ml/s). In contrast, AVA <= 1.0 cm(2) was highly prognostic for mortality (p = 0.003) if AVA was measured at flow rates above median (>242 ml/s). Findings were irrespective of multivariable adjustment for age, sex, and surgical/transcatheter aortic valve replacement (as time-dependent covariates); comorbidities; medications; and echocardiographic features. AVA <= 1.0 cm(2) was also not an independent predictor of mortality below median flow rate in the validation cohort. The optimal flow rate cutoff for prognostic threshold was 210 ml/s. CONCLUSIONS Transvalvular flow rate determines prognostic value of AVA in AS. AVA measured at low flow rate is not a good prognostic marker and therefore not a good diagnostic marker for truly severe AS. Flow rate assessment should be incorporated into clinical diagnosis, classification, and prognosis of AS. (C) 2020 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation.
引用
收藏
页码:1758 / 1769
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Management of aortic valve replacement according to the Gradient across symptomatic aortic valve stenosis and its prognostic impact
    Bridonneau, Valentin
    Galli, Elena
    Auffret, Vincent
    Lederlin, Mathieu
    Campion, Marine
    Le Breton, Herve
    Boulmier, Dominique
    Hubert, Arnaud
    Lenz, Pierre-Axel
    Leclercq, Christophe
    Oger, Emmanuel
    Donal, Erwan
    ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY-A JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR ULTRASOUND AND ALLIED TECHNIQUES, 2019, 36 (12): : 2136 - 2144
  • [22] Prognostic significance of aortic valve gradient in patients with severe aortic stenosis undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement
    Witberg, Guy
    Finkelstein, Arik
    Barbash, Issi
    Assali, Abid
    Shapira, Yaron
    Segev, Amit
    Halkin, Amir
    Fefer, Paul
    Ben-Shoshan, Jeremy
    Konigstein, Maayan
    Sagie, Alexander
    Guetta, Victor
    Kornowski, Ran
    Barsheshet, Alon
    CATHETERIZATION AND CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2017, 90 (07) : 1175 - 1182
  • [23] Pathology of the Aortic Valve: Aortic Valve Stenosis/Aortic Regurgitation
    Fishbein, Gregory A.
    Fishbein, Michael C.
    CURRENT CARDIOLOGY REPORTS, 2019, 21 (08)
  • [24] Transvalvular Flow, Sex, and Survival After Valve Replacement Surgery in Patients With Severe Aortic Stenosis
    Guzzetti, Ezequiel
    Poulin, Anthony
    Annabi, Mohamed-Salah
    Zhang, Bin
    Kalavrouziotis, Dimitri
    Couture, Christian
    Dagenais, Francois
    Pibarot, Philippe
    Clavel, Marie-Annick
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2020, 75 (16) : 1897 - 1909
  • [25] Prognostic Value of Renal Function in Patients With Aortic Stenosis Treated With Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement
    Meneguz-Moreno, Rafael A.
    Ramos, Auristela Io
    Siqueira, Dimytri
    de Castro-Filho, Antonio
    Jatene, Tannas
    Jeronimo, Andreia Dias
    Le Bihan, David
    Moreira, Adriana
    Arrais, Magaly
    Abizaid, Alexandre
    Sousa, Amanda
    Sousa, J. Eduardo
    CATHETERIZATION AND CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2017, 89 (03) : 452 - 459
  • [26] Prognostic Value of Lung Ultrasound in Aortic Stenosis
    Szabo, Istvan Adorjan
    Gargani, Luna
    Morvai-Illes, Blanka
    Polestyuk-Nemeth, Nora
    Frigy, Attila
    Varga, Albert
    Agoston, Gergely
    FRONTIERS IN PHYSIOLOGY, 2022, 13
  • [28] Prognostic Value of Aortic Valve Calcification in Asymptomatic Patients With NonSevere Aortic Valve Stenosis and Preserved Ejection Fraction
    Ye, Zi
    Foley, Thomas A.
    Gajjar, Rohan
    Sarano, Maurice E. Enriquez
    Michelena, Hector I.
    CIRCULATION, 2023, 148
  • [29] Aortic valve replacement improves survival in severe aortic stenosis with gradient-area mismatch
    Mo, Yujing
    Van Camp, Guy
    Di Gioia, Giuseppe
    Barbato, Emanuele
    Ondrus, Tomas
    Casselman, Filip
    Vanderheyden, Marc
    De Bruyne, Bernard
    Bartunek, Jozef
    Penicka, Martin
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CARDIO-THORACIC SURGERY, 2018, 53 (03) : 569 - 575
  • [30] Prognostic value of myocardial fibrosis in patients with severe aortic valve stenosis
    Milano, Aldo Domenico
    Faggian, Giuseppe
    Dodonov, Mikhail
    Golia, Giorgio
    Tomezzoli, Anna
    Bortolotti, Uberto
    Mazzucco, Alessandro
    JOURNAL OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2012, 144 (04) : 830 - 837