Enantioselective LC analysis of synephrine in natural products on a protein-based chiral stationary phase

被引:42
作者
Pellati, F [1 ]
Benvenuti, S [1 ]
Melegari, M [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Modena & Reggio Emilia, Dept Pharmaceut Sci, I-41100 Modena, Italy
关键词
Citrus aurantium L. var. amara; adrenergic amines; synephrine; enantiomer separation; protein-based chiral stationary phase; chiral-CBH;
D O I
10.1016/j.jpba.2004.09.008
中图分类号
O65 [分析化学];
学科分类号
070302 ; 081704 ;
摘要
An enantioselective LC method with photodiode array detection (PAD) was developed for the enantioseparation of (+/-)-synephrine from C. aurantium L. var. amara fruits and phytotherapic derivatives by using a protein-based chiral stationary phase with cellobiohydrolase as the chiral selector (Chiral-CBH). Analyses were carried out on a Chiral-CBH column (100 x 4.0 mm i.d., 5 mu m), with a mobile phase consisting of 2-propanol (5%, w/w) in sodium phosphate buffer (pH 6.0; 10 mM) and disodium EDTA (50 mu M). The flow rate was 0.8 mL/min. Detection was set at 225 nm. To identify the order of elution, the racemate was resolved by the preparation of suitable diastereoisomeric salts with antipodes of appropriate organic acids. Isolation of synephrine from C aurantium fruits and phytoproducts was performed by solid-phase extraction (SPE) with a strong cation-exchange phase. The method developed was validated and was found to be linear in the 0.40-40.14 mu g/mL range (r(2) = 1.000, P < 0.0001) for both synephrine enantiomers. The limit of detection (LOD) for each enantiomer was 0.04 mu g/mL. The limit of quantification (LOQ) for each enantiomer was 0.13 mu g/mL. Intra-day precision (calculated as %R.S.D.) ranged from 0.03 to 0.24% for (-)-synephrine and from 0.03 to 0.35% for (+)-synephrine. Inter-day precision (calculated as %R.S.D.) ranged from 0.07 to 1.45% for (-)-synephrine and from 0.06 to 1.26% for (+)synephrine. Intra- and inter-day accuracies (calculated as %recovery) were in the ranges of 97.4-100.6 and 98.0-101.6% for (-)-synephrine, and in the ranges 97.0-101.5 and 98.1-102.8% for (+)-synephrine. The results of the application of the method to the analysis of C aurantium samples showed that (-)-synephrine was the main component. (+)-Synephrine was not detected in C aurantium fruits and was present in low concentration in the phytoproducts. (c) 2004 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:839 / 849
页数:11
相关论文
共 36 条
[1]   ACTIVITIES OF OCTOPAMINE AND SYNEPHRINE STEREOISOMERS ON ALPHA-ADRENOCEPTORS [J].
BROWN, CM ;
MCGRATH, JC ;
MIDGLEY, JM ;
MUIR, AGB ;
OBRIEN, JW ;
THONOOR, CM ;
WILLIAMS, CM ;
WILSON, VG .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF PHARMACOLOGY, 1988, 93 (02) :417-429
[2]   Stereospecific analysis of ecstasy-like N-ethyl-3,4-ethylenedioxyamphetamine and its metabolites in humans [J].
Brunnenberg, M ;
Kovar, KA .
JOURNAL OF CHROMATOGRAPHY B, 2001, 751 (01) :9-18
[3]   Enantioselective quantitation of the ecstasy compound (R)- and (S)-N-ethyl-3,4-methylenedioxyamphetamine and its major metabolites in human plasma and urine [J].
Buechler, J ;
Schwab, M ;
Mikus, G ;
Fischer, B ;
Hermle, L ;
Marx, C ;
Grön, G ;
Spitzer, M ;
Kovar, KA .
JOURNAL OF CHROMATOGRAPHY B-ANALYTICAL TECHNOLOGIES IN THE BIOMEDICAL AND LIFE SCIENCES, 2003, 793 (02) :207-222
[5]   Antiobesity and cardiovascular toxic effects of Citrus aurantium extracts in the rat:: a preliminary report [J].
Calapai, G ;
Firenzuoli, F ;
Saitta, A ;
Squadrito, F ;
Arlotta, MR ;
Costantino, G ;
Inferrera, G .
FITOTERAPIA, 1999, 70 (06) :586-592
[6]   Selective activation of β3-adrenoceptors by octopamine:: comparative studies in mammalian fat cells [J].
Carpéné, C ;
Galitzky, J ;
Fontana, E ;
Atgié, C ;
Lafontan, M ;
Berlan, M .
NAUNYN-SCHMIEDEBERGS ARCHIVES OF PHARMACOLOGY, 1999, 359 (04) :310-321
[7]   Enantioselective ligand exchange in modern separation techniques [J].
Davankov, VA .
JOURNAL OF CHROMATOGRAPHY A, 2003, 1000 (1-2) :891-915
[8]  
DAVIN LB, 1991, RECENT ADV PHYTOCHEM, V25, P75
[9]   LIQUID-CHROMATOGRAPHIC SEPARATION OF ENANTIOMERS OF ADRENERGIC AGONISTS [J].
GAL, J ;
BROWN, TR .
JOURNAL OF PHARMACOLOGICAL METHODS, 1986, 16 (03) :261-269