Effect of Right Posterior Bile Duct Anatomy on Biliary Complications in Patients Undergoing Right Lobe Living Donor Liver Transplant

被引:2
作者
Tezcaner, Tugan [1 ]
Dinc, Nadire [2 ]
Karakayali, Feza Y. [1 ]
Kirnap, Mahir [1 ]
Coskun, Mehmet [3 ]
Moray, Gokhan [1 ]
Haberal, Mehmet [1 ]
机构
[1] Baskent Univ, Dept Gen Surg, Ankara, Turkey
[2] Baskent Univ, Sanliurfa Mehmet Akif Inan Egitim & Arastirma Has, Ankara, Turkey
[3] Baskent Univ, Dept Radiol, Ankara, Turkey
关键词
Biliary leakage; Infraportal; Supraportal; RISK-FACTORS; RECONSTRUCTION; MANAGEMENT; RECIPIENTS; COHORT; GRAFT;
D O I
10.6002/ect.2016.0200
中图分类号
R3 [基础医学]; R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1001 ; 1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Objectives: Our aim was to evaluate the influence of the localization of right posterior bile duct anatomy relative to portal vein of the donors on posttransplant bile duct complications. Materials and Methods:We retrospectively investigated 141 patients who had undergone living donor liver transplant using right hemiliver grafts. The patients were classified based on the pattern of the right posterior bile duct and divided into infraportal and supraportal types. Clinical donor and recipient risk factors and surgical outcomes were compared for their relationship with biliary complications using logistic regression analyses. Results: The 2 groups were similar according to demographic and clinical features. The biliary complication rate was 23.7% (9/38) in the infraportal group and 47.4% (37/78) in the supraportal group (P = .014). An analysis of risk factors for the development of anastomotic bile leak using logistic regression showed that a supraportal right posterior bile duct anatomy was a statistically significant positive predictor, with odds ratio of 18.905 (P = .012; confidence interval, 1.922-185.967). The distance of the right posterior bile duct from confluence was significantly lower in patients with biliary complications than in those without (mean of 7.66 vs 0.40 mm; P = .044). According to receiver operating characteristic analyses, the cutoff point for the length of right bile duct to right posterior bile duct from the hepatic confluence was 9.5 mm regarding presence of complications. Conclusions: Factors influencing bile duct anastomosis leakage were supraportal-type donor bile duct anatomy and length of the right main bile duct from biliary confluence. Hepatic arterial complications were similarly a risk factor for biliary strictures. Because of the multiple factors leading to complications in living donor liver transplant, it is challenging to group these patients by operative risk; however, establishing risk models may facilitate the prediction of complications.
引用
收藏
页码:759 / 767
页数:9
相关论文
共 30 条
  • [1] Biliary reconstruction, its complications and management of biliary complications after adult liver transplantation: a systematic review of the incidence, risk factors and outcome
    Akamatsu, Nobuhisa
    Sugawara, Yasuhiko
    Hashimoto, Daijo
    [J]. TRANSPLANT INTERNATIONAL, 2011, 24 (04) : 379 - 392
  • [2] Steatosis of the hepatic graft as a risk factor for post-transplant biliary complications
    Baccarani, Umberto
    Isola, Miriam
    Adani, Gian L.
    Avellini, Claudio
    Lorenzin, Dario
    Rossetto, Anna
    Curro, Giuseppe
    Comuzzi, Chiara
    Toniutto, Pierluigi
    Risaliti, Andrea
    Soldano, Franca
    Bresadola, Vittorio
    De Anna, Dino
    Bresadola, Fabrizio
    [J]. CLINICAL TRANSPLANTATION, 2010, 24 (05) : 631 - 635
  • [3] Logistic regression in the medical literature: Standards for use and reporting, with particular attention to one medical domain
    Bagley, SC
    White, H
    Golomb, BA
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2001, 54 (10) : 979 - 985
  • [4] SURGICAL ANATOMY AND ANATOMICAL SURGERY OF THE LIVER
    BISMUTH, H
    [J]. WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1982, 6 (01) : 3 - 9
  • [5] Bile Duct Anastomotic Stricture After Adult-to-Adult Right Lobe Living Donor Liver Transplantation
    Chok, Kenneth Siu Ho
    Chan, See Ching
    Cheung, Tan To
    Sharr, William Wei
    Chan, Albert Chi Yan
    Lo, Chung Mau
    Fan, Sheung Tat
    [J]. LIVER TRANSPLANTATION, 2011, 17 (01) : 47 - 52
  • [6] Adult living donor versus deceased donor liver transplantation A 10-year prospective single center experience
    Fisher, Robert A.
    Cotterell, Adrian H.
    Maluf, Daniel G.
    Stravitz, Richard Todd
    Ashworth, April
    Nakatsuka, Mitsuru
    Sterling, Richard K.
    Luketic, Velimir A.
    Behnke, Martha K.
    Posner, Marc P.
    [J]. ANNALS OF HEPATOLOGY, 2009, 8 (04) : 298 - 307
  • [7] Recipient Morbidity After Living and Deceased Donor Liver Transplantation: Findings from the A2ALL Retrospective Cohort Study†
    Freise, C. E.
    Gillespie, B. W.
    Koffron, A. J.
    Lok, A. S. F.
    Pruett, T. L.
    Emond, J. C.
    Fair, J. H.
    Fisher, R. A.
    Olthoff, K. M.
    Trotter, J. F.
    Ghobrial, R. M.
    Everhart, J. E.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, 2008, 8 (12) : 2569 - 2579
  • [8] Biliary complications in 96 consecutive right lobe living donor transplant recipients
    Gondolesi, GE
    Varotti, G
    Florman, SS
    Muñoz, L
    Fishbein, TM
    Emre, SH
    Schwartz, ME
    Miller, C
    [J]. TRANSPLANTATION, 2004, 77 (12) : 1842 - 1848
  • [9] HABERAL M, 1992, TRANSPLANT P, V24, P2687
  • [10] HABERAL M, 1993, TRANSPLANT P, V25, P2211