A hydrologic/water quality model application protocol

被引:190
作者
Engel, Bernard
Storm, Dan
White, Mike
Arnold, Jeff
Arabi, Mazdak
机构
[1] Purdue Univ, W Lafayette, IN 47907 USA
[2] Oklahoma State Univ, Stillwater, OK 74078 USA
[3] USDA ARS, Temple, TX 76502 USA
来源
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN WATER RESOURCES ASSOCIATION | 2007年 / 43卷 / 05期
关键词
simulation; quality assurance/quality control; runoff; nonpoint source pollution;
D O I
10.1111/j.1752-1688.2007.00105.x
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
This paper presents a procedure for standard application of hydrologic / water quality models. To date, most hydrologic / water quality modeling projects and studies have not utilized formal protocols, but rather have employed ad hoc approaches. The procedure proposed is an adaptation and extension of steps identified from relevant literature including guidance provided by the U. S. Environmental Protection Agency. This protocol provides guidance for establishing written plans prior to conducting modeling efforts. Eleven issues that should be addressed in model application plans were identified and discussed in the context of hydrologic / water quality studies. A graded approach for selection of the level of documentation for each item was suggested. The creation and use of environmental modeling plans is increasingly important as the results of modeling projects are used in decision- making processes that have significant implications. Standard modeling application protocols similar to the proposed procedure herein provide modelers with a roadmap to be followed, reduces modelers' bias, enhances the reproducibility of model application studies, and eventually improves acceptance of modeling outcomes.
引用
收藏
页码:1223 / 1236
页数:14
相关论文
共 33 条
[11]  
King KW, 2001, T ASAE, V44, P569
[12]  
Kirsch K, 2002, T ASAE, V45, P1757, DOI 10.13031/2013.11427
[13]   Monte Carlo assessment of parameter uncertainty in conceptual catchment models: the Metropolis algorithm [J].
Kuczera, G ;
Parent, E .
JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 1998, 211 (1-4) :69-85
[14]   Evaluating the use of "goodness-of-fit" measures in hydrologic and hydroclimatic model validation [J].
Legates, DR ;
McCabe, GJ .
WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 1999, 35 (01) :233-241
[15]  
LOAGUE K, 1991, Journal of Contaminant Hydrology, V7, P51, DOI 10.1016/0169-7722(91)90038-3
[16]  
Mankin KR, 2002, T ASAE, V45, P1375, DOI 10.13031/2013.11074
[17]   Scale-dependent soil and climate variability effects on watershed water balance of the SWAT model [J].
Muttiah, RS ;
Wurbs, RA .
JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 2002, 256 (3-4) :264-285
[18]   Uncertainty in rainfall-runoff model simulations and the implications for predicting the hydrologic effects of land-use change [J].
Nandakumar, N ;
Mein, RG .
JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 1997, 192 (1-4) :211-232
[19]  
Refsgaard J. C., 1996, Distributed hydrological modelling., P41
[20]   Parameterisation, calibration and validation of distributed hydrological models [J].
Refsgaard, JC .
JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 1997, 198 (1-4) :69-97