Ion therapy of prostate cancer: daily rectal dose reduction by application of spacer gel

被引:16
作者
Rucinski, Antoni [1 ,2 ]
Brons, Stephan [1 ,2 ]
Richter, Daniel [3 ]
Habl, Gregor [1 ,2 ]
Debus, Juergen [1 ,2 ]
Bert, Christoph [3 ]
Haberer, Thomas [1 ,2 ]
Jaekel, Oliver [1 ,2 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Clin Heidelberg, Heidelberg Ion Beam Therapy Ctr HIT, D-69120 Heidelberg, Germany
[2] Univ Clin Heidelberg, Dept Radiat Oncol, D-69120 Heidelberg, Germany
[3] GSI Helmholtzzentrum Schwerionenforsch GmbH, Biophys Div, Darmstadt, Germany
[4] Deutsch Krebsforschungszentrum, D-69120 Heidelberg, Germany
关键词
Prostate cancer; Ion therapy; Proton therapy; Spacer gel; Treatment planning; INTENSITY-MODULATED RADIOTHERAPY; CONFORMAL RADIOTHERAPY; ABSORBABLE HYDROGEL; SCANNED PROTON; FEASIBILITY; TOXICITY; BEAMS; VERIFICATION; VARIABILITY; SEPARATION;
D O I
10.1186/s13014-015-0348-1
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: Ion beam therapy represents a promising approach to treat prostate cancer, mainly due to its high conformity and radiobiological effectiveness. However, the presence of prostate motion, patient positioning and range uncertainties may deteriorate target dose and increase exposure of organs at risk. Spacer gel injected between prostate and rectum may increase the safety of prostate cancer (PC) radiation therapy by separating the rectum from the target dose field. The dosimetric impact of the application of spacer gel for scanned carbon ion therapy of PC has been analyzed at Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT). Materials and methods: The robustness of ion therapy treatment plans was investigated by comparison of two data sets of patients treated with and without spacer gel. A research treatment planning system for ion therapy was used for treatment plan optimization and calculation of daily dose distributions on 2 to 9 Computed Tomography (CT) studies available for each of the 19 patients. Planning and daily dose distributions were analyzed with respect to target coverage, maximal dose to the rectum (excluding 1 ml of the greatest dose; Dmax-1 ml) and the rectal volume receiving dose greater than 90% of prescribed target dose (V90(Rectum)), respectively. Results: The application of spacer gel did substantially diminish rectum dose. Dmax-1 ml on the treatment planning CT was on average reduced from 100.0 +/- 1.0% to 90.2 +/- 4.8%, when spacer gel was applied. The robustness analysis performed with daily CT studies demonstrated for all analyzed patient cases that application of spacer gel results in a decrease of the daily V90(Rectum) index, which calculated over all patient cases and CT studies was 10.2 +/- 10.4 [ml] and 1.1 +/- 2.1 [ml] for patients without and with spacer gel, respectively. Conclusions: The dosimetric benefit of increasing the distance between prostate and rectum using spacer gel for PC treatment with carbon ion beams has been quantified. Application of spacer gel substantially reduced rectal exposure to high treatment dose and, therefore, can reduce the hazard of rectal toxicity in ion beam therapy of PC. The results of this study enable modifications of the PC ion therapy protocol such as dose escalation or hypofractionation.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 36 条
  • [1] An experimental approach to improve the Monte Carlo modelling of offline PET/CT-imaging of positron emitters induced by scanned proton beams
    Bauer, J.
    Unholtz, D.
    Kurz, C.
    Parodi, K.
    [J]. PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2013, 58 (15) : 5193 - 5213
  • [2] Planning target margin calculations for prostate radiotherapy based on intrafraction and interfraction motion using four localization methods
    Beltran, Chris.
    Herman, Michael G.
    Davis, Brian J.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2008, 70 (01): : 289 - 295
  • [3] Motion in radiotherapy: particle therapy
    Bert, C.
    Durante, M.
    [J]. PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2011, 56 (16) : R113 - R114
  • [4] The effect of anterior proton beams in the setting of a prostate-rectum spacer
    Christodouleas, John P.
    Tang, Shikui
    Susil, Robert C.
    McNutt, Todd R.
    Song, Danny Y.
    Bekelman, Justin
    Deville, Curtiland
    Vapiwala, Neha
    DeWeese, Theodore L.
    Lu, Hsiao-Ming
    Both, Stefan
    [J]. MEDICAL DOSIMETRY, 2013, 38 (03) : 315 - 319
  • [5] Conventional versus hypofractionated high-dose intensity-modulated radiotherapy for prostate cancer: preliminary safety results from the CHHiP randomised controlled trial
    Dearnaley, David
    Syndikus, Isabel
    Sumo, Georges
    Bidmead, Margaret
    Bloomfield, David
    Clark, Catharine
    Gao, Annie
    Hassan, Shama
    Horwich, Alan
    Huddart, Robert
    Khoo, Vincent
    Kirkbride, Peter
    Mayles, Helen
    Mayles, Philip
    Naismith, Olivia
    Parker, Chris
    Patterson, Helen
    Russell, Martin
    Scrase, Christopher
    South, Chris
    Staffurth, John
    Hall, Emma
    [J]. LANCET ONCOLOGY, 2012, 13 (01) : 43 - 54
  • [6] Escalated-dose versus control-dose conformal radiotherapy for prostate cancer: long-term results from the MRC RT01 randomised controlled trial
    Dearnaley, David P.
    Jovic, Gordana
    Syndikus, Isabel
    Khoo, Vincent
    Cowan, Richard A.
    Graham, John D.
    Aird, Edwin G.
    Bottomley, David
    Huddart, Robert A.
    Jose, Chakiath C.
    Matthews, John H. L.
    Millar, Jeremy L.
    Murphy, Claire
    Russell, J. Martin
    Scrase, Christopher D.
    Parmar, Mahesh K. B.
    Sydes, Matthew R.
    [J]. LANCET ONCOLOGY, 2014, 15 (04) : 464 - 473
  • [7] Phase III pilot study of dose escalation using conformal radiotherapy in prostate cancer: PSA control and side effects
    Dearnaley, DP
    Hall, E
    Lawrence, D
    Huddart, RA
    Eeles, R
    Nutting, CM
    Gadd, J
    Warrington, A
    Bidmead, M
    Horwich, A
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2005, 92 (03) : 488 - 498
  • [8] Prospective evaluation of a hydrogel spacer for rectal separation in dose-escalated intensity-modulated radiotherapy for clinically localized prostate cancer
    Eckert, Franziska
    Alloussi, Saladin
    Paulsen, Frank
    Bamberg, Michael
    Zips, Daniel
    Spillner, Patrick
    Gani, Cihan
    Kramer, Ulrich
    Thorwarth, Daniela
    Schilling, David
    Mueller, Arndt-Christian
    [J]. BMC CANCER, 2013, 13
  • [9] Intra- and inter-observer variability in contouring prostate and seminal vesicles: implications for conformal treatment planning
    Fiorino, C
    Reni, M
    Bolognesi, A
    Cattaneo, GM
    Calandrino, R
    [J]. RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 1998, 47 (03) : 285 - 292
  • [10] Feasibility and Preliminary Rectal Toxicity Data of Transperineal Polyethylene Glycol Gel Spacer Implantation Prior to Hypofractionated VMAT in Prostate Cancer
    Greco, C.
    Panichi, M.
    Coppola, M.
    Morelli, G.
    Pasqualetti, F.
    Sainato, A.
    Pomara, G.
    Tana, L.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2012, 84 (03): : S393 - S394