Lab-assay for estimating methane emissions from deep-pit swine manure storages

被引:11
|
作者
Andersen, D. S. [1 ]
Van Weelden, M. B. [1 ]
Trabue, S. L. [2 ]
Pepple, L. M. [3 ]
机构
[1] Iowa State Univ, Dept Agr & Biosyst Engn, Ames, IA 50011 USA
[2] Natl Lab Agr & Environm, Ames, IA 50011 USA
[3] Univ Illinois, Agr & Biol Engn Dept, Urbana, IL 61801 USA
关键词
Methane production rate assay; Liquid manure; Methane production; Manure storage; Manure management; Methane response to temperature; GREENHOUSE-GAS EMISSIONS; ANAEROBIC-DIGESTION; SLURRY; TEMPERATURE; AMMONIA; METHANOGENESIS; NITROGEN; REMOVAL;
D O I
10.1016/j.jenvman.2015.05.003
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Methane emission is an important tool in the evaluation of manure management systems due to the potential impact it has on global climate change. Field procedures used for estimating methane emission rates require expensive equipment, are time consuming, and highly variable between farms. The purpose Of this paper is to report a simple laboratory procedure for estimating methane emission from stored manure. The test developed was termed a methane production rate (MPR) assay as it provides a shortterm biogas production measurement. The MPR assay incubation time is short (3d), requires no sample preparation in terms of inoculation or dilution of manure, is incubated at room temperature, and the manure is kept stationary. These conditions allow for high throughput of samples and were chosen to replicate the conditions within deep-pit manure storages. In brief, an unaltered aliquot of manure was incubated at room temperature for a three-days to assay the current rate of methane being generated by the manure. The results from this assay predict an average methane emission factor of 12.2 +/- 8.1 kg CH4 head(-1) yr(-1) per year, or about 5.5 +/- 3.7 kg CH4 per finished animal, both of which compare well to literature values of 5.5 +/- 1.1 kg CH4 per finished pig for deep-pit systems (Liu et al., 2013). The average methane flux across all sites and months was estimated to be 22 +/- 17 mg CH4 m(-2)-min(-1), which is within literature values for deep-pit systems ranging from 0.24 to 63 mg CH4 m(-2)-min(-1) (Park et al., 2006) and similar to the 15 mg CH4 m(-2)-min(-1) estimated by (Zahn et al., 2001). (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:18 / 26
页数:9
相关论文
共 28 条
  • [11] A mechanistic model for simulating methane emissions from unstirred liquid manure storages
    Huang, Q.
    Wohlgemut, O.
    Cicek, N.
    France, J.
    Kebreab, E.
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF SOIL SCIENCE, 2010, 90 (03) : 507 - 516
  • [12] Methane emissions from a swine manure tank in western Canada
    Flesch, Thomas K.
    Verge, Xavier P. C.
    Desjardins, Raymond L.
    Worth, Devon
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2013, 93 (01) : 159 - 169
  • [13] Mitigation of Odor, NH3, H2S, GHG, and VOC Emissions With Current Products for Use in Deep-Pit Swine Manure Storage Structures
    Chen, Baitong
    Koziel, Jacek A.
    Banik, Chumki
    Ma, Hantian
    Lee, Myeongseong
    Wi, Jisoo
    Meiirkhanuly, Zhanibek
    O'Brien, Samuel C.
    Li, Peiyang
    Andersen, Daniel S.
    Bialowiec, Andrzej
    Parker, David B.
    FRONTIERS IN ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE, 2020, 8
  • [14] PARTIAL BIOFILTRATION OF EXHAUST AIR FROM A HYBRID VENTILATED DEEP-PIT SWINE FINISHER BARN
    Hoff, S. J.
    Harmon, J. D.
    Chen, L.
    Janni, K. A.
    Schmidt, D. R.
    Nicolai, R. E.
    Jacobson, L. D.
    APPLIED ENGINEERING IN AGRICULTURE, 2009, 25 (02) : 269 - 280
  • [15] Odorous compounds sources and transport from a swine deep-pit finishing operation: A case study
    Trabue, Steven
    Scoggin, Kiwood
    Tyndall, John
    Sauer, Thomas
    Hernandez-Ramirez, Guillermo
    Pfeiffer, Richard
    Hatfield, Jerry
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2019, 233 : 12 - 23
  • [16] Air quality of swine wean-finish facilities with deep-pit and pull-plug-lagoon manure storage systems
    Zhao, L. Y.
    Manuzon, R.
    Brugger, M.
    Arnold, C.
    Bender, Roger
    Livestock Environment VII, Proceedings, 2005, : 207 - 215
  • [17] Empirical model of odor emission from deep-pit swine finishing barns to derive a standardized odor emission factor
    Schauberger, Guenther
    Lim, Teng-Teeh
    Ni, Ji-Qin
    Bundy, Dwaine S.
    Haymore, Barry L.
    Diehl, Claude A.
    Duggirala, Ravi K.
    Heber, Albert J.
    ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 2013, 66 : 84 - 90
  • [18] A TWO-STAGE WOOD CHIP-BASED BIOFILTER SYSTEM TO MITIGATE ODORS FROM A DEEP-PIT SWINE BUILDING
    Chen, L.
    Hoff, S. J.
    APPLIED ENGINEERING IN AGRICULTURE, 2012, 28 (06) : 893 - 901
  • [19] LAB-SCALE ASSESSMENT OF AMMONIA EMISSIONS FROM SOLID SWINE MANURE PILES OF DIFFERENT HEIGHTS
    Dong, H.
    Zhu, Z.
    Zhou, Z.
    APPLIED ENGINEERING IN AGRICULTURE, 2012, 28 (05) : 695 - 700
  • [20] Influence of thymol and a urease inhibitor on coliform bacteria, odor, urea, and methane from a swine production manure pit
    Varel, Vincent H.
    Wells, James E.
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY, 2007, 36 (03) : 773 - 779