Innovation in Orthopaedics: Part 2-How to Translate Ideas and Research into Clinical Practice

被引：2
作者：
Fernandes, Tiago Lazzaretti [1 ]
de Faria, Rafaella Rogatto [1 ]
Gonzales, Maria Alice [2 ]
Sherman, Seth L. [3 ]
Goldchmit, Sara [2 ]
Fleury, Andre [4 ]
机构：
[1] Univ Sao Paulo, Hosp Clin HCFMUSP, Sports Med Div, Inst Orthoped & Traumatol,Fac Med, 333 Dr Ovidio Pires de Campos, BR-05403010 Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil
[2] Univ Sao Paulo, Sch Architecture & Urbanism, Design Dept, Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil
[3] Stanford Univ, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Stanford, CA USA
[4] Univ Sao Paulo, Sch Engn, Prod Engn Dept, Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil
来源：
CURRENT REVIEWS IN MUSCULOSKELETAL MEDICINE | 2022年 / 15卷 / 02期
基金：
美国国家卫生研究院; 巴西圣保罗研究基金会;
关键词：
Orthopaedics; Innovation; Clinical practice; Healthcare; User experience; Creativity; Biodesign; Design sprint; Design thinking; PROOF-OF-CONCEPT; DESIGN;
D O I：
10.1007/s12178-022-09749-4
中图分类号：
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学（修复外科学）];
学科分类号：
摘要：
Purpose of Review This paper presents some approaches and techniques for translating an idea or research into clinical practice, considering the innovation development process. Recent Findings Innovative tools have been a key solution for healthcare problems, such as musculoskeletal disorders, which represent a great economic burden and are among the leading causes of disability. There has been an increase in publications on this topic, but there has been no analysis of the process of innovation development. This review describes the innovation phases for translating an idea or research into clinical practice, considering the stages of discovering the opportunity, innovation creation, project specification, technology development, and innovation launch. An analysis of the innovation development process to translate an idea or research into clinical practice, including concepts, approaches, and techniques that shows the "why", "how", and "what" of innovation.
引用
收藏
页码：150 / 155
页数：6
相关论文
共 35 条
  • [1] Matrix-associated autologous chondrocyte transplantation/implantation (MACT/MACI) - 5-year follow-up
    Behrens, Peter
    Bitter, Thomas
    Kurz, Bodo
    Russlies, Martin
    [J]. KNEE, 2006, 13 (03) : 194 - 202
  • [2] Matrix-Applied Characterized Autologous Cultured Chondrocytes Versus Microfracture Five-Year Follow-up of a Prospective Randomized Trial
    Brittberg, Mats
    Recker, David
    Ilgenfritz, John
    Saris, Daniel B. F.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2018, 46 (06) : 1343 - 1351
  • [3] Innovation and Entrepreneurship: Perspectives From Orthopedic Surgery
    Campbell, Kevin J.
    Louie, Philip K.
    Khorsand, Derek A.
    Frisch, Nicholas B.
    Gerlinger, Tad L.
    Levine, Brett R.
    [J]. ORTHOPEDICS, 2018, 41 (03) : 135 - 140
  • [4] Design Council, 2019, WHAT IS FRAM INN DES
  • [5] Implementing the Biodesign Process for Medical Device Innovation in Head and Neck Surgery
    Dharmawan, Rena
    Ho, Henry
    Ng, Harry Ho Man
    Iyer, Narayanan Gopalakrishna
    Tan, Hiang Khoon
    Tan, Ngian Chye
    [J]. SURGICAL INNOVATION, 2020, 27 (06) : 653 - 658
  • [6] Development of a Novel Large Animal Model to Evaluate Human Dental Pulp Stem Cells for Articular Cartilage Treatment
    Fernandes, Tiago Lazzaretti
    Shimomura, Kazunori
    Asperti, Andre
    Gomes Pinheiro, Carla Cristina
    Amaral Caetano, Heloisa Vasconcellos
    Oliveira, Claudia Regina G. C. M.
    Nakamura, Norimasa
    Hernandez, Arnaldo Jose
    Bueno, Daniela Franco
    [J]. STEM CELL REVIEWS AND REPORTS, 2018, 14 (05) : 734 - 743
  • [7] Network analysis of surgical innovation: Measuring value and the virality of diffusion in robotic surgery
    Garas, George
    Cingolani, Isabella
    Panzarasa, Pietro
    Darzi, Ara
    Athanasiou, Thanos
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2017, 12 (08):
  • [8] Using the Design Sprint process to enhance and accelerate behavioral medicine progress: a case study and guidance
    Jake-Schoffman, Danielle E.
    McVay, Megan A.
    [J]. TRANSLATIONAL BEHAVIORAL MEDICINE, 2021, 11 (05) : 1099 - 1106
  • [9] Open innovation and intellectual property: time for a reboot?
    Judd, Duncan B.
    [J]. DRUG DISCOVERY TODAY, 2013, 18 (19-20) : 907 - 909
  • [10] Innovation and Innovators: Does It Take 10,000 Hours?
    Jupiter, Jesse B.
    Gruber, Jillian S.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HAND SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2012, 37A (07): : 1447 - 1452
1234