Treatment of unstable trochanteric fractures - Randomised comparison of the gamma nail and the proximal femoral nail

被引:204
作者
Schipper, IB
Steyerberg, EW
Castelein, RM
van der Heijden, FHWM
den Hoed, PT
Kerver, AJH
van Vugt, AB
机构
[1] Erasmus Univ, Med Ctr, Ctr Clin Descis Sci, Dept Publ Hlth, NL-3000 DR Rotterdam, Netherlands
[2] Univ Hosp Utrecht, Dept Orthopaed, NL-3508 GA Utrecht, Netherlands
[3] Onze Lieve Vrouw Hosp, Dept Surg, NL-1090 HM Amsterdam, Netherlands
[4] Ikazia Hosp, Dept Surg, NL-3083 AN Rotterdam, Netherlands
[5] St Franciscus Hosp, Dept Surg, NL-3045 PM Amsterdam, Netherlands
来源
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-BRITISH VOLUME | 2004年 / 86B卷 / 01期
关键词
D O I
10.1302/0301-620X.86B1.14455
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
The proximal femoral nail (PFN) is a recently introduced intramedullary system, designed to improve treatment of unstable trochanteric fractures of the hip. In a multicentre prospective clinical study, the intra-operative use, complications and outcome of treatment using the PFN (n = 211) were compared with those using the gamma nail (GN) (n = 213). The intra-operative blood loss was lower with the PFN (220 ml v 287 ml, p = 0.001). Post-operatively, more lateral protrusion of the hip screws of the PFN (7.6%) was documented, compared with the gamma nail (1.6%, p = 0.02). Most local complications were related to suboptimal reduction of the fracture and/or positioning of the implant. Functional outcome and consolidation were equal for both implants. Generally, the results of treatment of unstable trochanteric fractures were comparable for the PFN and GN. The pitfalls and complications were similar, and mainly surgeon- or fracture-related, rather than implant-related.
引用
收藏
页码:86 / 94
页数:9
相关论文
共 44 条
[1]   The AO/ASIF proximal femoral nail (PFN) for the treatment of unstable trochanteric femoral fracture [J].
Al-yassari, G ;
Langstaff, RJ ;
Jones, JWM ;
Al-Lami, M .
INJURY-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THE CARE OF THE INJURED, 2002, 33 (05) :395-399
[2]   Complications and technical problems with the gamma nail [J].
Albareda, J ;
Laderiga, A ;
Palanca, D ;
Paniagua, L ;
Seral, F .
INTERNATIONAL ORTHOPAEDICS, 1996, 20 (01) :47-50
[3]   GAMMA-NAIL VS COMPRESSION SCREW FOR TROCHANTERIC FEMORAL FRACTURES - 15 REOPERATIONS IN A PROSPECTIVE, RANDOMIZED STUDY OF 378 PATIENTS [J].
AUNE, AK ;
EKELAND, A ;
ODEGAARD, B ;
GROGAARD, B ;
ALHO, A .
ACTA ORTHOPAEDICA SCANDINAVICA, 1994, 65 (02) :127-130
[4]  
BANNISTER GC, 1990, CLIN ORTHOP RELAT R, V254, P242
[5]  
Bartonicek I, 2002, J ORTHOP TRAUMA, V16, P363, DOI 10.1097/00005131-200205000-00016
[6]  
BORIANI S, 1991, ORTHOPEDICS, V14, P1307
[7]   FIXATION OF INTERTROCHANTERIC FRACTURES OF THE FEMUR - A RANDOMIZED PROSPECTIVE COMPARISON OF THE GAMMA-NAIL AND THE DYNAMIC HIP SCREW [J].
BRIDLE, SH ;
PATEL, AD ;
BIRCHER, M ;
CALVERT, PT .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-BRITISH VOLUME, 1991, 73 (02) :330-334
[8]   COMPARISON OF DYNAMIC HIP SCREW AND GAMMA-NAIL - A PROSPECTIVE, RANDOMIZED, CONTROLLED TRIAL [J].
BUTT, MS ;
KRIKLER, SJ ;
NAFIE, S ;
ALI, MS .
INJURY-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THE CARE OF THE INJURED, 1995, 26 (09) :615-618
[9]  
COCKRELL JR, 1988, PSYCHOPHARMACOL BULL, V24, P689
[10]  
Dávid A, 2000, ORTHOPADE, V29, P294