Progressive collapse test of assembled monolithic concrete frame spatial substructures with different anchorage methods in the beam-column joint

被引:15
作者
Zhang, Wang-Xi [1 ,2 ]
Wu, Hao [2 ]
Zhang, Jin-Yi [3 ]
Hwang, Hyeon-Jong [2 ]
Yi, Wei-Jian [2 ]
机构
[1] Hunan Univ, Key Lab Bldg Safety & Energy Efficiency, Minist Educ, Changsha 410082, Peoples R China
[2] Hunan Univ, Coll Civil Engn, Changsha, Peoples R China
[3] Hunan Univ Sci & Technol, Sch Civil Engn, Xiangtan, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
assembled monolithic concrete; frame structure; headed bar; hooked bar; lap splice; progressive collapse; spatial substructure; SUB-ASSEMBLAGES; RESISTANCE; BEHAVIOR; PERFORMANCE; CAPACITY;
D O I
10.1177/1369433219900679
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
In this study, three two-third-scale assembled monolithic concrete spatial frame substructures with three beams and four columns were tested to evaluate progressive collapse resistance. The test parameters are anchorage methods, such as 90 degrees hooked bar, lap splice in U-shaped assembled monolithic concrete beam, and headed bar using welded anchor plate. Force-displacement-controlled pseudo-static loading was applied to the mid-column. On the basis of structural performance, including load-carrying capacity, deformation capacity, crack distribution, rebar strain, and failure mode, the progressive collapse resistance mechanism of the specimens was analyzed. Test results showed that three types of cracks were developed: initial flexural cracks in beam-column joints, diagonal cracks due to compressive arch action, and tension cracks due to catenary action. The specimen using the headed bar exhibited the best progressive collapse performance, whereas the specimen using the lap splice connection showed the worst structural performance. Regardless of anchorage methods, bond failure did not occur during progressive collapse. The progressive collapse performance of the specimen was assessed based on Chinese and American codes.
引用
收藏
页码:1785 / 1799
页数:15
相关论文
共 37 条
[1]  
ABRAMS DP, 1987, ACI STRUCT J, V84, P502
[2]   Experimental and Numerical Evaluation of Progressive Collapse Behavior in Scaled RC Beam-Column Subassemblage [J].
Ahmadi, Rasool ;
Rashidian, Omid ;
Abbasnia, Reza ;
Nav, Foad Mohajeri ;
Usefi, Nima .
SHOCK AND VIBRATION, 2016, 2016
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2012, THESIS
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2013, ALTERNATE PATH ANAL
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2013, Seismic rehabilitation of existing buildings
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2000, 356 FEMA
[7]  
BIRKELAND PW, 1996, ACI STRUCT J, V96, P473
[8]  
*CECS, 2014, CECS3922014
[9]   Progressive collapse-resisting capacity of RC beam-column sub-assemblage [J].
Choi, H. ;
Kim, J. .
MAGAZINE OF CONCRETE RESEARCH, 2011, 63 (04) :297-310
[10]   Progressive collapse performance analysis of precast reinforced concrete structures [J].
Feng, De-Cheng ;
Wang, Zhun ;
Wu, Gang .
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF TALL AND SPECIAL BUILDINGS, 2019, 28 (05)