FIGO grading versus binary architectural grading in endometrioid carcinoma.: A population based study

被引：0
|
作者：
Sastrowijoto, SH
Kuijpers, KC
Kloosterman-Boele, WM
Oostindiër, MJ
机构：
[1] Reinier de Graaf Hosp, Dept Anat & Surg Pathol, NL-2600 GA Delft, Netherlands
[2] Leyenburg Hosp, The Hague, Netherlands
[3] Comprehens Canc Ctr W, Leiden, Netherlands
来源：
JOURNAL OF PATHOLOGY | 2003年 / 201卷
关键词：
D O I：
暂无
中图分类号：
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号：
100214 ;
摘要：
引用
收藏
页码：52A / 52A
页数：1
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A novel binary grading system for uterine endometrioid carcinoma is superior to FIGO grading for predicting prognosis.
    Lax, SF
    Pizer, E
    Ronnett, B
    Kurman, RJ
    MODERN PATHOLOGY, 1998, 11 (01) : 107A - 107A
  • [2] The reproducibility of a binary tumor grading system for uterine endometrial endometrioid carcinoma, compared with FIGO system and nuclear grading
    Sagae, S
    Saito, T
    Satoh, M
    Ikeda, T
    Kimura, S
    Mori, M
    Sato, N
    Kudo, R
    ONCOLOGY, 2004, 67 (5-6) : 344 - 350
  • [3] FIGO Grading and Binary Grading Systems for Endometrial Carcinoma in Biopsy and Hysterectomy
    Guan, H.
    Bandyopadhyay, S.
    Fathallah, L.
    Feng, J.
    Khalifeh, I.
    Albashiti, B.
    Ibrahim, M.
    Hayek, K.
    Munkarah, A.
    Ali-Fehmi, R.
    MODERN PATHOLOGY, 2010, 23 : 244A - 244A
  • [4] FIGO Grading and Binary Grading Systems for Endometrial Carcinoma in Biopsy and Hysterectomy
    Guan, H.
    Bandyopadhyay, S.
    Fathallah, L.
    Feng, J.
    Khalifeh, I.
    Albashiti, B.
    Ibrahim, M.
    Hayek, K.
    Munkarah, A.
    Ali-Fehmi, R.
    LABORATORY INVESTIGATION, 2010, 90 : 244A - 244A
  • [5] FIGO Versus Silverberg Grading Systems in Ovarian Endometrioid Carcinoma A Comparative Prognostic Analysis
    Parra-Herran, Carlos
    Bassiouny, Dina
    Vicus, Danielle
    Olkhov-Mitsel, Ekaterina
    Cesari, Matthew
    Ismiil, Nadia
    Nofech-Mozes, Sharon
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL PATHOLOGY, 2019, 43 (02) : 161 - 167
  • [6] A binary grading system for uterine endometrioid carcinomas is comparable to FIGO grading for predicting prognosis and has superior interobserver reproducibility compared to FIGO and nuclear grading.
    Lax, SF
    Ronnett, BM
    Pizer, ES
    Wu, L
    Kurman, RJ
    LABORATORY INVESTIGATION, 1999, 79 (01) : 119A - 119A
  • [7] A binary architectural grading system for uterine endometrial endometrioid carcinoma has superior reproducibility compared with FIGO grading and identifies subsets of advance-stage tumors with favorable and unfavorable prognosis
    Lax, SF
    Kurman, RJ
    Pizer, ES
    Wu, L
    Ronnett, BM
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL PATHOLOGY, 2000, 24 (09) : 1201 - 1208
  • [8] Grading Uterine Endometrioid Carcinoma A Proposal That Binary Is Best
    Conlon, Niamh
    Leitao, Mario M., Jr.
    Abu-Rustum, Nadeem R.
    Soslow, Robert A.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL PATHOLOGY, 2014, 38 (12) : 1583 - 1587
  • [9] Comparative Prognostic Value of FIGO and Silverberg Grading Systems in Ovarian Endometrioid Carcinoma
    Bassiouny, Dina
    Nofech-Mozes, Sharon
    Cesari, Matthew
    Ismiil, Nadia
    Parra-Herran, Carlos
    MODERN PATHOLOGY, 2018, 31 : 407 - 407
  • [10] Comparative Prognostic Value of FIGO and Silverberg Grading Systems in Ovarian Endometrioid Carcinoma
    Bassiouny, Dina
    Nofech-Mozes, Sharon
    Cesari, Matthew
    Ismiil, Nadia
    Parra-Herran, Carlos
    LABORATORY INVESTIGATION, 2018, 98 : 407 - 407
12345