US-CHINA ECONOMIC CONFLICT ASSESSMENT IN THE MAJOR PARADIGMS OF THE THEORY OF INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS

被引:1
作者
Kadochnikov, Denis, V [1 ,2 ]
Pushkina, Daria B. [1 ]
机构
[1] St Petersburg State Univ, Fac Liberal Arts & Sci, St Petersburg, Russia
[2] Int Ctr Social & Econ Res, Leontief Ctr, St Petersburg, Russia
关键词
international relations; institutions; realism; neorealism; liberalism; neoliberalism; constructivism; Marxism; US; China; trade war; economic conflict; POWER; INSTITUTIONS; CONSTRUCTIVISM; ORIGINS; ANARCHY; FUTURE; SYSTEM;
D O I
10.17835/2076-6297.2019.11.4.090-105
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
The study of international relations in general and of international economic relations in particular, provides opportunities for using the methodology of new institutional economics (or its close analogs in other social sciences) to analyze political and economic developments on the global arena. Modern paradigms of international relations represent different cases of institutional analysis applied to the same subject but based on different assumptions, different ethical / philosophical approaches, and relying upon different basic facts or axioms. This paper gives an overview of the key paradigms of the international relations (Realism / Neorealism, Liberalism / Neoliberalism, Marxism / Neomarxism and Constructivism) from the institutional perspective, and examines the current economic conflict between the US and People's Republic of China from the perspective of each paradigm. From the institutional / new institutional methodological perspective, it is interesting to examine how each paradigm of the theory of international relations views international actors and institutions through which they interact. The knowledge about modern paradigms of international relations is necessary for correct interpretation of the academic discourse on the matter, as well as of the policy advice offered by the academic and expert community to policymakers.
引用
收藏
页码:90 / 105
页数:16
相关论文
共 70 条
  • [1] Adler Emanuel., 2019, SOCIAL THEORY COGNIT
  • [2] The Distribution of Identity and the Future of International Order: China's Hegemonic Prospects
    Allan, Bentley B.
    Vucetic, Srdjan
    Hopf, Ted
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATION, 2018, 72 (04) : 839 - 869
  • [3] Amin Samir., 2010, Eurocentrism, V2nd
  • [4] Amin Samir., 2013, IMPLOSION CONT CAPIT
  • [5] Amin Samir., 1977, IMPERIALISM UNEQUAL
  • [6] [Anonymous], 1965, IMPERIALISM STUDY
  • [7] [Anonymous], INT COORDINATION FIN
  • [8] [Anonymous], 2006, WASHINGTON Q
  • [9] [Anonymous], 2004, RULES WORLD INT ORG
  • [10] [Anonymous], I THEORY INT RELATIO