Comparison of Two Electromagnetic Navigation Systems For CT-Guided Punctures: A Phantom Study

被引:27
作者
Putzer, D. [1 ]
Arco, D. [1 ]
Schamberger, B. [1 ]
Schanda, F. [1 ]
Mahlknecht, J. [1 ]
Widmann, G. [1 ]
Schullian, P. [1 ]
Jaschke, W. [1 ]
Bale, R. [1 ]
机构
[1] Med Univ Innsbruck, Dept Radiol, Innsbruck, Austria
来源
ROFO-FORTSCHRITTE AUF DEM GEBIET DER RONTGENSTRAHLEN UND DER BILDGEBENDEN VERFAHREN | 2016年 / 188卷 / 05期
关键词
electromagnetic navigation system; CT guided punctures; needle guidance system; biopsy; CT; interventional procedures; STEREOTACTIC RADIOFREQUENCY ABLATION; INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY; RADIATION-EXPOSURE; RESPIRATORY MOTION; ACCURACY; TRACKING; BIOPSY; GUIDANCE; FEASIBILITY;
D O I
10.1055/s-0042-103691
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: We compared the targeting accuracy and reliability of two different electromagnetic navigation systems for manually guided punctures in a phantom. Materials and Methods: CT data sets of a gelatin filled plexiglass phantom were acquired with 1, 3, and 5 mm slice thickness. After paired-point registration of the phantom, a total of 480 navigated stereotactic needle insertions were performed manually using electromagnetic guidance with two different navigation systems (Medtronic Stealth Station: AxiEM; Philips: PercuNav). A control CT was obtained to measure the target positioning error between the planned and actual needle trajectory. Results: Using the Philips PercuNav, the accomplished Euclidean distances were 4.42 +/- 1.33mm, 4.26 +/- 1.32 mm, and 4.46 +/- 1.56 mm at a slice thickness of 1, 3, and 5 mm, respectively. The mean lateral positional errors were 3.84 +/- 1.59 mm, 3.84 +/- 1.43 mm, and 3.81 +/- 1.71 mm, respectively. Using the Medtronic Stealth Station AxiEM, the Euclidean distances were 3.86 +/- 2.28 mm, 3.74 +/- 2.1 mm, and 4.81 +/- 2.07 mm at a slice thickness of 1, 3, and 5 mm, respectively. The mean lateral positional errors were 3.29 +/- 1.52 mm, 3.16 +/- 1.52 mm, and 3.93 +/- 1.68 mm, respectively. Conclusion: Both electromagnetic navigation devices showed excellent results regarding puncture accuracy in a phantom model. The Medtronic Stealth Station AxiEM provided more accurate results in comparison to the Philips PercuNav for CT with 3 mm slice thickness. One potential benefit of electromagnetic navigation devices is the absence of visual contact between the instrument and the sensor system. Due to possible interference with metal objects, incorrect position sensing may occur. In contrast to the phantom study, patient movement including respiration has to be compensated for in the clinical setting. Key points: Commercially available electromagnetic navigation systems have the potential to improve the therapeutic range for CT guided percutaneous procedures by comparing the needle placement accuracy on the basis of planning CT data sets with different slice thickness. Citation Format:. Putzer D, Arco D, Schamberger B et al. Comparison of Two Electromagnetic Navigation Systems For CT-Guided Punctures: A Phantom Study. Fortschr Rontgenstr 2016; 188: 470-478
引用
收藏
页码:470 / 478
页数:9
相关论文
共 33 条
  • [1] Electromagnetic Navigation System for CT-Guided Biopsy of Small Lesions
    Appelbaum, Liat
    Sosna, Jacob
    Nissenbaum, Yizhak
    Benshtein, Alexander
    Goldberg, S. Nahum
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2011, 196 (05) : 1194 - 1200
  • [2] Percutaneous stereotactic radiofrequency ablation of colorectal liver metastases
    Bale, Reto
    Widmann, Gerlig
    Schullian, Peter
    Haidu, Marion
    Pall, Georg
    Klaus, Alexander
    Weiss, Helmut
    Biebl, Matthias
    Margreiter, Raimund
    [J]. EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2012, 22 (04) : 930 - 937
  • [3] Stereotactic Radiofrequency Ablation
    Bale, Reto
    Widmann, Gerlig
    Haidu, Marion
    [J]. CARDIOVASCULAR AND INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY, 2011, 34 (04) : 852 - 856
  • [4] The Effect of Respiratory Motion on Pulmonary Nodule Location During Electromagnetic Navigation Bronchoscopy
    Chen, Alexander
    Pastis, Nicholas
    Furukawa, Brian
    Silvestri, Gerard A.
    [J]. CHEST, 2015, 147 (05) : 1275 - 1281
  • [5] The use of noninvasive electromagnetic neuronavigation for slit ventricle syndrome and complex hydrocephalus in a pediatric population Clinical article
    Clark, Simon
    Sangra, Meharpal
    Hayhurst, Caroline
    Kandasamy, Jothi
    Jenkinson, Michael
    Lee, Maggie
    Mallucci, Conor
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY-PEDIATRICS, 2008, 2 (06) : 430 - 434
  • [6] Electromagnetic navigation platform for endovascular surgery: how to develop sensorized catheters and guidewires
    Condino, S.
    Ferrari, V.
    Freschi, C.
    Alberti, A.
    Berchiolli, R.
    Mosca, F.
    Ferrari, M.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ROBOTICS AND COMPUTER ASSISTED SURGERY, 2012, 8 (03) : 300 - 310
  • [7] Accuracy assessment protocols for electromagnetic tracking systems
    Frantz, DD
    Wiles, AD
    Leis, SE
    Kirsch, SR
    [J]. PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2003, 48 (14) : 2241 - 2251
  • [8] Haidegger T, 2011, IEEE ENG MED BIO, P1905, DOI 10.1109/IEMBS.2011.6090539
  • [9] A Prospective Study of the Safety and Efficacy of Frameless, Pinless Electromagnetic Image-Guided Biopsy of Cerebral Lesions
    Harrisson, Stuart E.
    Shooman, David
    Grundy, Paul L.
    [J]. NEUROSURGERY, 2012, 70 : 29 - 33
  • [10] A robotic needle-positioning and guidance system for CT-guided puncture: Ex vivo results
    Kettenbach, Joachim
    Kara, Levent
    Toporek, Grzegorz
    Fuerst, Martin
    Kronreif, Gernot
    [J]. MINIMALLY INVASIVE THERAPY & ALLIED TECHNOLOGIES, 2014, 23 (05) : 271 - 278