Radioelement distributions in the proterozoic granites and associated pegmatites of Gabal El Fereyid area, Southeastern Desert, Egypt

被引:22
作者
Abd El-Naby, HH [1 ]
Saleh, GM [1 ]
机构
[1] Nucl Mat Author, Cairo, Egypt
关键词
granites; pegmatites; gamma-ray spectrometry; uranium; thorium;
D O I
10.1016/j.apradiso.2003.07.002
中图分类号
O61 [无机化学];
学科分类号
070301 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Lithologically, the rock types in the Gabal El Fereyid area are dominantly granites with minor amounts of pegmatites. The granites range in composition from tonalite to granite-adamallite with minor acidic dikes, quartz and pegmatite veins. The granite-adamallite is peraluminous and formed as a result of partial melting of amphibole-bearing rocks at depths of similar to24-30 km and at temperatures of 800-950degreesC. Among the different rock types, the muscovite-rich pegmatites had the highest U and Th contents (66 and 38 ppm on average, respectively). The high level of radioactivity in pegmatites is attributed to the presence of the radioactive minerals thorianite, uranophane and allanite as confirmed by XRD analysis. Binary relations of Zr/U, Zr/Th, Ce/U and Ce/Th against either U or Th in the granite-adamellite exhibit significant negative correlations indicating that both elements are not preferentially hosted in the accessory minerals phases such as zircon and monazite, but could be associated with major forming minerals such as biotite, muscovite, plagioclase and quartz, or U is situated within labile sites within granite. The uranium and thorium enrichment in the pegmatites is a two-stage process. The primary stage is magmatic whereas the secondary enrichment is from hydrothermal concentration. The magmatic U and Th are indicated by the presence of thorianite and allanite, whereas evidence of hydrothermal mineralization is the alteration of rock-forming minerals such as feldspar and the formation of secondary minerals such as uranophane and pyrite. (C) 2003 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:289 / 299
页数:11
相关论文
共 18 条
[1]  
Chatterjee A. K., 1982, URANIUM GRANITES, P11
[2]  
Clarke S.P., 1966, Geol. Soc. Am. Memoir, V97, P521, DOI DOI 10.1130/MEM97-P521
[3]   CONSTRAINTS ON MELTING AND MAGMA PRODUCTION IN THE CRUST [J].
CLEMENS, JD ;
VIELZEUF, D .
EARTH AND PLANETARY SCIENCE LETTERS, 1987, 86 (2-4) :287-306
[4]   LEUKOGRANITES OF THE HIMALAYA KARAKORAM - IMPLICATIONS FOR MAGMATIC EVOLUTION WITHIN COLLISIONAL BELTS AND THE STUDY OF COLLISION-RELATED LEUKOGRANITE PETROGENESIS [J].
CRAWFORD, MB ;
WINDLEY, BF .
JOURNAL OF VOLCANOLOGY AND GEOTHERMAL RESEARCH, 1990, 44 (1-2) :1-19
[5]  
Debon F., 1983, T R SOC EDINBRUGH EA, V73, P135, DOI DOI 10.1017/S0263593300010117
[6]  
GABERLMAN JW, 1977, 3 STUDIES GEOLOGY
[7]   Post-collisional granite generation and HT-LP metamorphism by radiogenic heating:: the Variscan South Bohemian Batholith [J].
Gerdes, A ;
Wörner, G ;
Henk, A .
JOURNAL OF THE GEOLOGICAL SOCIETY, 2000, 157 :577-587
[8]  
HOLLOWAY JR, 1972, J PETROL, V13, P1
[9]  
IBRAHIM ME, 1997, EGYPT P EGYPT ACAD S, V47, P173
[10]  
IBRAHIM ME, 2001, EGYPT APPL RAD ISOT, V55, P123