Antagonistic selection between adult thorax and wing size in field released Drosophila melanogaster independent of thermal conditions

被引:40
作者
Hoffmann, A. A.
Ratna, E.
Sgro, C. M.
Barton, M.
Blacket, M.
Hallas, R.
De Garis, S.
Weeks, A. R.
机构
[1] Univ Melbourne, Ctr Environm Stress & Adaptat Res, Bio21 Inst, Dept Zool, Parkville, Vic 3052, Australia
[2] Monash Univ, Sch Biol Sci, Clayton, Vic 3168, Australia
关键词
antagonistic selection; cline; Drosophila; field release; size;
D O I
10.1111/j.1420-9101.2007.01422.x
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Attempts to explain size variation in Drosophila and other small insects often focus on the larval stage and association between development time and size, but patterns are also influenced by direct selection on size-related traits in the adults. Here we use multiple field releases of Drosophila melanogaster to test the association between size and one component of field fitness, the ability of Drosophila to locate resources for feeding and breeding. We find antagonistic selection between wing length and thorax length in both males and females, such that capture at baits is higher for flies with relatively larger thorax lengths and smaller wings. However flies with large wings relative to thoraces disperse further as reflected in the longer distances moved to baits. These patterns did not depend strongly on weather conditions, suggesting that selection on adult size is at least partly independent of temperature. Antagonistic selection between size traits can generate changes in size along gradients if the distribution of resources in the environment varies and selects for different dispersal patterns, particularly as dispersal is relatively higher under warmer conditions.
引用
收藏
页码:2219 / 2227
页数:9
相关论文
共 35 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1998, Genetics and Analysis of Quantitative Traits (Sinauer)
[2]   MORPHOLOGY, PERFORMANCE AND FITNESS [J].
ARNOLD, SJ .
AMERICAN ZOOLOGIST, 1983, 23 (02) :347-361
[3]  
Azevedo RBR, 1998, EVOLUTION, V52, P1353, DOI [10.2307/2411305, 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1998.tb02017.x]
[4]   Genetic variation and plasticity of thorax length and wing length in Drosophila aldrichi and D-buzzatii [J].
Barker, JSF ;
Krebs, RA .
JOURNAL OF EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY, 1995, 8 (06) :689-709
[5]   Bergmann and converse Bergmann latitudinal clines in arthropods: Two ends of a continuum? [J].
Blanckenhorn, WU ;
Demont, M .
INTEGRATIVE AND COMPARATIVE BIOLOGY, 2004, 44 (06) :413-424
[6]  
Blanckenhorn WU, 1999, EVOLUTION, V53, P286, DOI 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1999.tb05354.x
[7]   A tale of two matrices: multivariate approaches in evolutionary biology [J].
Blows, M. W. .
JOURNAL OF EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY, 2007, 20 (01) :1-8
[8]   A reassessment of genetic limits to evolutionary change [J].
Blows, MW ;
Hoffmann, AA .
ECOLOGY, 2005, 86 (06) :1371-1384
[9]   Temperature dependence of fitness components in geographical populations of Drosophila melanogaster:: changing the association between size and fitness [J].
Bochdanovits, Z ;
De Jong, G .
BIOLOGICAL JOURNAL OF THE LINNEAN SOCIETY, 2003, 80 (04) :717-725
[10]   VISUALIZING AND QUANTIFYING NATURAL-SELECTION [J].
BRODIE, ED ;
MOORE, AJ ;
JANZEN, FJ .
TRENDS IN ECOLOGY & EVOLUTION, 1995, 10 (08) :313-318