Stimulus quality affects expression of the acoustic startle response and prepulse inhibition in mice

被引:20
作者
Stoddart, C. W. [1 ,2 ]
Noonan, J. [1 ]
Martin-Iverson, M. T. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Western Australia, Pharmacol & Anaethesiol Unit M510, UWA Ctr Med Res, Crawley, WA 6009, Australia
[2] Western Australia Inst Med Res, Crawley, WA, Australia
[3] Graylands Hosp, Ctr Clin Res Neuropsychiat, Claremont, CA USA
关键词
startle reflex; PPI; mouse; reflex threshold; reflex capacity;
D O I
10.1037/0735-7044.122.3.516
中图分类号
B84 [心理学]; C [社会科学总论]; Q98 [人类学];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 030303 ; 04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
The relationship between stimulus intensity and startle response magnitude (SIRM) can assess the startle reflex and prepulse inhibition (PPI) with advantages over more commonly used methods. The current study used the SIRM relationships in mice to determine differences between white noise and pure tone (5 kHz) stimuli. Similarly to rats, the SIRM relationship showed a sigmoid pattern. The SIRM-derived reflex capacity (R-MAX) and response efficacy (slope) of the white noise and pure tone stimuli in the absence of prepulses were equivalent. However, the pure tone startle response threshold (D-MIN) was increased whereas the stimulus potency (1/ES50) was decreased when compared to white noise. Prepulses of both stimulus types inhibited R-MAX and increased D-MIN, but the white noise prepulses were more effective. Both stimulus intensity gating and motor capacity gating processes are shown to occur, dependent on prepulse intensity and stimulus onset asynchrony. Prepulse intensities greater than 10 dB below the startle threshold appear to produce PPI via stimulus intensity gating, whereas a motor capacity gating component appears at prepulse intensities near to the startle threshold.
引用
收藏
页码:516 / 526
页数:11
相关论文
共 48 条
[1]   PRE-STIMULUS EFFECTS ON HUMAN STARTLE REFLEX IN NORMALS AND SCHIZOPHRENICS [J].
BRAFF, D ;
STONE, C ;
CALLAWAY, E ;
GEYER, M ;
GLICK, I ;
BALI, L .
PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY, 1978, 15 (04) :339-343
[2]   Genetics of mouse behavior: Interactions with laboratory environment [J].
Crabbe, JC ;
Wahlsten, D ;
Dudek, BC .
SCIENCE, 1999, 284 (5420) :1670-1672
[3]   Behavioral phenotypes of inbred mouse strains: implications and recommendations for molecular studies [J].
Crawley, JN ;
Belknap, JK ;
Collins, A ;
Crabbe, JC ;
Frankel, W ;
Henderson, N ;
Hitzemann, RJ ;
Maxson, SC ;
Miner, LL ;
Silva, AJ ;
Wehner, JM ;
WynshawBoris, A ;
Paylor, R .
PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 1997, 132 (02) :107-124
[4]   AUDITORY PHYSICS - PHYSICAL PRINCIPLES IN HEARING THEORY .3. [J].
DEBOER, E .
PHYSICS REPORTS-REVIEW SECTION OF PHYSICS LETTERS, 1991, 203 (03) :125-231
[5]   TEMPORAL AUDITORY SUMMATION FOR PURE-TONES AND WHITE NOISE IN HOUSE MOUSE (MUS-MUSCULUS) [J].
EHRET, G .
JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 1976, 59 (06) :1421-1427
[7]   Effects of background noise on the human startle reflex and prepulse inhibition [J].
Flaten, MA ;
Nordmark, E ;
Elden, Å .
PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY, 2005, 42 (03) :298-305
[8]   Epigenetic sources of behavioral differences in mice [J].
Francis, DD ;
Szegda, K ;
Campbell, G ;
Martin, WD ;
Insel, TR .
NATURE NEUROSCIENCE, 2003, 6 (05) :445-446
[9]   Mouse genetic models for prepulse inhibition: an early review [J].
Geyer, MA ;
McIlwain, KL ;
Paylor, R .
MOLECULAR PSYCHIATRY, 2002, 7 (10) :1039-1053
[10]   HABITUATION OF THE BLINK REFLEX IN NORMALS AND SCHIZOPHRENIC-PATIENTS [J].
GEYER, MA ;
BRAFF, DL .
PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY, 1982, 19 (01) :1-6