Low serum testosterone predicts upgrading and upstaging of prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy

被引:18
|
作者
Gao, Yuan [1 ]
Jiang, Chen-Yi [1 ]
Mao, Shi-Kui [1 ]
Cui, Di [1 ]
Hao, Kui-Yuan [1 ]
Zhao, Wei [1 ]
Jiang, Qi [1 ]
Ruan, Yuan [1 ]
Xia, Shu-Jie [1 ]
Han, Bang-Min [1 ]
机构
[1] Shanghai Jiao Tong Univ, Sch Med, Dept Urol, Shanghai Gen Hosp, Shanghai 200080, Peoples R China
关键词
prostatic neoplasms; radical prostatectomy; serum total testosterone; BIOPSY GLEASON SCORE-6; ACTIVE SURVEILLANCE; GRADE; RISK; MANAGEMENT; PROGNOSIS; NOMOGRAM; UPDATE; LEVEL; AGE;
D O I
10.4103/1008-682X.169984
中图分类号
R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
摘要
Often, pathological Gleason Score (GS) and stage of prostate cancer (PCa) were inconsistent with biopsy GS and clinical stage. However, there were no widely accepted methods predicting upgrading and upstaging PCa. In our study, we investigated the association between serum testosterone and upgrading or upstaging of PCa after radical prostatectomy (RP). We enrolled 167 patients with PCa with biopsy GS <= 6, clinical stage <= T2c, and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) <10 ng ml(-1) from April 2009 to April 2015. Data including age, body mass index, preoperative PSA level, comorbidity, clinical presentation, and preoperative serum total testosterone level were collected. Upgrading occurred in 62 (37.1%) patients, and upstaging occurred in 73 (43.7%) patients. Preoperative testosterone was lower in the upgrading than nonupgrading group (3.72 vs 4.56, P < 0.01). Patients in the upstaging group had lower preoperative testosterone than those in the nonupstaging group (3.84 vs 4.57, P = 0.01). In multivariate logistic regression analysis, as both continuous and categorical variables, low serum testosterone was confirmed to be an independent predictor of pathological upgrading (P = 0.01 and P = 0.01) and upstaging (P = 0.01 and P = 0.02) after RR We suggest that low serum testosterone (<3 ng ml(-1)) is associated with a high rate of upgrading and upstaging after RP. It is better for surgeons to ensure close monitoring of PSA levels and imaging examination when selecting non-RP treatment, to be cautious in proceeding with nerve-sparing surgery, and to be enthusiastic in performing extended lymph node dissection when selecting RP treatment for patients with low serum testosterone.
引用
收藏
页码:639 / 643
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Use of the Prostate Health Index for the Detection of Aggressive Prostate Cancer at Radical Prostatectomy
    Mearini, Luigi
    Nunzi, Elisabetta
    Ferri, Carla
    Bellezza, Guido
    Lolli, Carolina
    Porrozzi, Carlo
    Porena, Massimo
    UROLOGIA INTERNATIONALIS, 2015, 95 (04) : 390 - 399
  • [42] New prostate cancer grade grouping system predicts survival after radical prostatectomy
    Erickson, Andrew
    Sandeman, Kevin
    Landensuo, Kanerva
    Nordling, Stig
    Kallajoki, Markku
    Seikkula, Heikki
    Butzow, Anna
    Vasarainen, Hanna
    Bostrom, Peter J.
    Taimen, Pekka
    Rannikko, Antti
    Mirtti, Tuomas
    HUMAN PATHOLOGY, 2018, 75 : 159 - 166
  • [43] Upgrading and upstaging at radical prostatectomy in the post prostate-specific antigen screening era: an effect of delayed diagnosis or a shift in patient selection?
    Edmund, Liz
    Rotker, Katherine L.
    Lakis, Neill S.
    Brito, Joseph M., III
    Lepe, Marcos
    Lombardo, Kara A.
    Renzulli, Joseph F., II
    Matoso, Andres
    HUMAN PATHOLOGY, 2017, 59 : 87 - 93
  • [44] Pretreatment serum testosterone level can predict pathological stage in localized prostate cancer patients treated with radical prostatectomy
    Imamoto, T
    Suzuki, H
    Fukasawa, S
    Shimbo, M
    Inahara, M
    Komiya, A
    Ueda, T
    Shiraishi, T
    Ichikawa, T
    Proceedings of the 8th International Congress of Andrology, 2005, : 177 - 182
  • [45] Pretreatment serum testosterone level as a predictive factor of pathological stage in localized prostate cancer patients treated with radical prostatectomy
    Imamoto, T
    Suzuki, H
    Fukasawa, S
    Shimbo, M
    Inahara, M
    Komiya, A
    Ueda, T
    Shiraishi, T
    Ichikawa, T
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2005, 47 (03) : 308 - 312
  • [46] MRI-based PI-RADS score predicts ISUP upgrading and adverse pathology at radical prostatectomy in men with biopsy ISUP 1 prostate cancer
    Dekalo, Snir
    Mazliah, Ohad
    Barkai, Eyal
    Bar-Yosef, Yuval
    Herzberg, Haim
    Bashi, Tomer
    Fahoum, Ibrahim
    Barnes, Sophie
    Sofer, Mario
    Yossepowitch, Ofer
    Keren-Paz, Gal
    Mano, Roy
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2024, 31 (04)
  • [47] A Nomogram Predicting Prostate Cancer-Specific Mortality after Radical Prostatectomy
    Porter, Christopher R.
    Suardi, Nazareno
    Capitanio, Umberto
    Hutterer, Georg C.
    Kodama, Koichi
    Gibbons, Robert P.
    Correa, Roy, Jr.
    Perrotte, Paul
    Montorsi, Francesco
    Karakiewicz, Pierre I.
    UROLOGIA INTERNATIONALIS, 2010, 84 (02) : 132 - 140
  • [48] Risk Factors for Relapse of Prostate Cancer after Radical Prostatectomy in Chinese Population
    You, Pinghong
    Xu, Liuting
    Tang, Liangyou
    Wang, Chunyang
    UROLOGY JOURNAL, 2024, 21 (03) : 155 - 161
  • [49] Radical Prostatectomy for Low-Risk Prostate Cancer Following Initial Active Surveillance: Results From a Prospective Observational Study
    Bul, Meelan
    Zhu, Xiaoye
    Rannikko, Antti
    Staerman, Frederic
    Valdagni, Riccardo
    Pickles, Tom
    Bangma, Chris H.
    Roobol, Monique J.
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2012, 62 (02) : 195 - 200
  • [50] Tumor Percent Involvement Predicts Prostate Specific Antigen Recurrence After Radical Prostatectomy Only in Men With Smaller Prostate
    Uhlman, Matthew A.
    Sun, Leon
    Stackhouse, Danielle A.
    Polascik, Thomas J.
    Mouraviev, Valdmir
    Robertson, Cary N.
    Albala, David M.
    Moul, Judd W.
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2010, 183 (03) : 997 - 1001