Low serum testosterone predicts upgrading and upstaging of prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy

被引:18
|
作者
Gao, Yuan [1 ]
Jiang, Chen-Yi [1 ]
Mao, Shi-Kui [1 ]
Cui, Di [1 ]
Hao, Kui-Yuan [1 ]
Zhao, Wei [1 ]
Jiang, Qi [1 ]
Ruan, Yuan [1 ]
Xia, Shu-Jie [1 ]
Han, Bang-Min [1 ]
机构
[1] Shanghai Jiao Tong Univ, Sch Med, Dept Urol, Shanghai Gen Hosp, Shanghai 200080, Peoples R China
关键词
prostatic neoplasms; radical prostatectomy; serum total testosterone; BIOPSY GLEASON SCORE-6; ACTIVE SURVEILLANCE; GRADE; RISK; MANAGEMENT; PROGNOSIS; NOMOGRAM; UPDATE; LEVEL; AGE;
D O I
10.4103/1008-682X.169984
中图分类号
R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
摘要
Often, pathological Gleason Score (GS) and stage of prostate cancer (PCa) were inconsistent with biopsy GS and clinical stage. However, there were no widely accepted methods predicting upgrading and upstaging PCa. In our study, we investigated the association between serum testosterone and upgrading or upstaging of PCa after radical prostatectomy (RP). We enrolled 167 patients with PCa with biopsy GS <= 6, clinical stage <= T2c, and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) <10 ng ml(-1) from April 2009 to April 2015. Data including age, body mass index, preoperative PSA level, comorbidity, clinical presentation, and preoperative serum total testosterone level were collected. Upgrading occurred in 62 (37.1%) patients, and upstaging occurred in 73 (43.7%) patients. Preoperative testosterone was lower in the upgrading than nonupgrading group (3.72 vs 4.56, P < 0.01). Patients in the upstaging group had lower preoperative testosterone than those in the nonupstaging group (3.84 vs 4.57, P = 0.01). In multivariate logistic regression analysis, as both continuous and categorical variables, low serum testosterone was confirmed to be an independent predictor of pathological upgrading (P = 0.01 and P = 0.01) and upstaging (P = 0.01 and P = 0.02) after RR We suggest that low serum testosterone (<3 ng ml(-1)) is associated with a high rate of upgrading and upstaging after RP. It is better for surgeons to ensure close monitoring of PSA levels and imaging examination when selecting non-RP treatment, to be cautious in proceeding with nerve-sparing surgery, and to be enthusiastic in performing extended lymph node dissection when selecting RP treatment for patients with low serum testosterone.
引用
收藏
页码:639 / 643
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Upgrading and upstaging in prostate cancer: From prostate biopsy to radical prostatectomy
    D'Elia, Carolina
    Cerruto, Maria Angela
    Cioffi, Antonio
    Novella, Giovanni
    Cavalleri, Stefano
    Artibani, Walter
    MOLECULAR AND CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2014, 2 (06) : 1145 - 1149
  • [2] Low serum total testosterone level as a predictor of upgrading in low-risk prostate cancer patients after radical prostatectomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Gan, Shu
    Liu, Jian
    Chen, Zhiqiang
    Xiang, Songtao
    Gu, Chiming
    Li, Siyi
    Wang, Shusheng
    INVESTIGATIVE AND CLINICAL UROLOGY, 2022, 63 (04) : 407 - 414
  • [3] Pathological upgrading and upstaging at radical prostatectomy in Jamaican men with low-risk prostate cancer
    Morrison, Belinda F.
    Aikenb, William D.
    Reid, Gareth
    Mayhew, Richard
    Hanchard, Barrie
    ECANCERMEDICALSCIENCE, 2019, 13
  • [4] Neoadjuvant androgen-deprivation therapy with radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer in association with age and serum testosterone
    Akitake, Naoko
    Shiota, Masaki
    Obata, Hirofumi
    Takeuchi, Ario
    Kashiwagi, Eiji
    Imada, Kenjiro
    Kiyoshima, Keijiro
    Inokuchi, Junichi
    Tatsugami, Katsunori
    Eto, Masatoshi
    PROSTATE INTERNATIONAL, 2018, 6 (03) : 104 - 109
  • [5] Upgrading and upstaging of low-risk prostate cancer among Korean patients: a multicenter study
    Hwang, Insang
    Lim, Donghoon
    Jeong, Young Beom
    Park, Seung Chol
    Noh, Jun Hwa
    Kwon, Dong Deuk
    Kang, Taek Won
    ASIAN JOURNAL OF ANDROLOGY, 2015, 17 (05) : 811 - 814
  • [6] Low serum total testosterone level as a predictor of upstaging and upgrading in low-risk prostate cancer patients meeting the inclusion criteria for active surveillance
    Ferro, Matteo
    Lucarelli, Giuseppe
    Bruzzese, Dario
    Di Lorenzo, Giuseppe
    Perdona, Sisto
    Autorino, Riccardo
    Cantiello, Francesco
    La Rocca, Roberto
    Busetto, Gian Maria
    Cimmino, Amelia
    Buonerba, Carlo
    Battaglia, Michele
    Damiano, Rocco
    De Cobelli, Ottavio
    Mirone, Vincenzo
    Terracciano, Daniela
    ONCOTARGET, 2017, 8 (11) : 18424 - 18434
  • [7] Advancing Age and the Odds of Upgrading and Upstaging at Radical Prostatectomy in Men with Gleason Score 6 Prostate Cancer
    Leeman, Jonathan E.
    Chen, Ming-Hui
    Huland, Hartwig
    Graefen, Markus
    D'Amico, Anthony, V
    Tilki, Derya
    CLINICAL GENITOURINARY CANCER, 2019, 17 (06) : E1116 - E1121
  • [8] Intravoxel incoherent motion predicts positive surgical margins and Gleason score upgrading after radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer
    Meng, Shuang
    Gan, Wanting
    Chen, Lihua
    Wang, Nan
    Liu, Ailian
    RADIOLOGIA MEDICA, 2023, 128 (06): : 668 - 678
  • [9] Higher rates of upgrading and upstaging in older patients undergoing radical prostatectomy and qualifying for active surveillance
    Busch, Jonas
    Magheli, Ahmed
    Leva, Natalia
    Ferrari, Michelle
    Kramer, Juergen
    Klopf, Christian
    Kempkensteffen, Carsten
    Miller, Kurt
    Brooks, James D.
    Gonzalgo, Mark L.
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2014, 114 (04) : 517 - 521
  • [10] Preoperative prostate health index predicts adverse pathology and Gleason score upgrading after radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer
    Novak, Vojtech
    Vesely, Stepan
    Luksanova, Hana
    Prusa, Richard
    Capoun, Otakar
    Fiala, Vojtech
    Dolejsova, Olga
    Sedlackova, Hana
    Kucera, Radek
    Stejskal, Jiri
    Zalesky, Miroslav
    Babjuk, Marko
    BMC UROLOGY, 2020, 20 (01)