A Machine learning model trained on dual-energy CT radiomics significantly improves immunotherapy response prediction for patients with stage IV melanoma

被引:34
作者
Brendlin, Andreas Stefan [1 ]
Peisen, Felix [1 ]
Almansour, Haidara [1 ]
Afat, Saif [1 ]
Eigentler, Thomas [2 ,3 ]
Amaral, Teresa [2 ]
Faby, Sebastian [4 ]
Calvarons, Adria Font [4 ]
Nikolaou, Konstantin [1 ,5 ]
Othman, Ahmed E. [1 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Univ Klinikum Tubingen, Dept Diagnost & Intervent Radiol, Tubingen, Germany
[2] Eberhard Karls Univ Tubingen, Ctr Dermatooncol, Dept Dermatol, Tubingen, Germany
[3] Charite Univ Med Berlin, Dept Dermatol Venereol & Allergol, Berlin, Germany
[4] Siemens Healthcare GmbH, Computed Tomog, Erlangen, Germany
[5] Cluster Excellence 2180, Image Guided & Funct Instructed Tumor Therapies i, Tubingen, Germany
[6] Johannes Gutenberg Univ Hosp Mainz, Inst Neuroradiol, Mainz, Germany
关键词
melanoma; CRITERIA;
D O I
10.1136/jitc-2021-003261
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background To assess the additive value of dual-energy CT (DECT) over single-energy CT (SECT) to radiomics-based response prediction in patients with metastatic melanoma preceding immunotherapy. Material and methods A total of 140 consecutive patients with melanoma (58 female, 63 +/- 16 years) for whom baseline DECT tumor load assessment revealed stage IV and who were subsequently treated with immunotherapy were included. Best response was determined using the clinical reports (81 responders: 27 complete response, 45 partial response, 9 stable disease). Individual lesion response was classified manually analogous to RECIST 1.1 through 1291 follow-up examinations on a total of 776 lesions (6.7 +/- 7.2 per patient). The patients were sorted chronologically into a study and a validation cohort (each n=70). The baseline DECT was examined using specialized tumor segmentation prototype software, and radiomic features were analyzed for response predictors. Significant features were selected using univariate statistics with Bonferroni correction and multiple logistic regression. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of the best subset was computed (AUROC). For each combination (SECT/DECT and patient response/lesion response), an individual random forest classifier with 10-fold internal cross-validation was trained on the study cohort and tested on the validation cohort to confirm the predictive performance. Results We performed manual RECIST 1.1 response analysis on a total of 6533 lesions. Multivariate statistics selected significant features for patient response in SECT (min. brightness, R-2=0.112, padj. <= 0.001) and DECT (textural coarseness, R-2=0.121, padj. <= 0.001), as well as lesion response in SECT (mean absolute voxel intensity deviation, R-2=0.115, padj. <= 0.001) and DECT (iodine uptake metrics, R-2 >= 0.12, padj. <= 0.001). Applying the machine learning models to the validation cohort confirmed the additive predictive power of DECT (patient response AUROC SECT=0.5, DECT=0.75; lesion response AUROC SECT=0.61, DECT=0.85; p<0.001). Conclusion The new method of DECT-specific radiomic analysis provides a significant additive value over SECT radiomics approaches for response prediction in patients with metastatic melanoma preceding immunotherapy, especially on a lesion-based level. As mixed tumor response is not uncommon in metastatic melanoma, this lends a powerful tool for clinical decision-making and may potentially be an essential step toward individualized medicine.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]   Robust prediction of response to immune checkpoint blockade therapy in metastatic melanoma [J].
Auslander, Noam ;
Zhang, Gao ;
Lee, Joo Sang ;
Frederick, Dennie T. ;
Miao, Benchun ;
Moll, Tabea ;
Tian, Tian ;
Wei, Zhi ;
Madan, Sanna ;
Sullivan, Ryan J. ;
Boland, Genevieve ;
Flaherty, Keith ;
Herlyn, Meenhard ;
Ruppin, Eytan .
NATURE MEDICINE, 2018, 24 (10) :1545-+
[2]   Pathologic stratification of operable lung adenocarcinoma using radiomics features extracted from dual energy ct images [J].
Bae, Jung Min ;
Jeong, Ji Yun ;
Lee, Ho Yun ;
Sohn, Insuk ;
Kim, Hye Seung ;
Son, Ji Ye ;
Kwon, O. Jung ;
Choi, Joon Young ;
Lee, Kyung Soo ;
Shim, Young Mog .
ONCOTARGET, 2017, 8 (01) :523-535
[3]   Radiomics, Tumor Volume, and Blood Biomarkers for Early Prediction of Pseudoprogression in Patients with Metastatic Melanoma Treated with Immune Checkpoint Inhibition [J].
Basler, Lucas ;
Gabrys, Hubert S. ;
Hogan, Sabrina A. ;
Pavic, Matea ;
Bogowicz, Marta ;
Vuong, Diem ;
Tanadini-Lang, Stephanie ;
Forster, Robert ;
Kudura, Ken ;
Huellner, Martin W. ;
Dummer, Reinhard ;
Guckenberger, Matthias ;
Levesque, Mitchell P. .
CLINICAL CANCER RESEARCH, 2020, 26 (16) :4414-4425
[4]  
Berwick M., 2017, MELANOMA DEV, P39
[5]   Epidemiology and Risk Factors of Melanoma [J].
Carr, Stephanie ;
Smith, Christy ;
Wernberg, Jessica .
SURGICAL CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2020, 100 (01) :1-+
[6]   Prognostic value of radiomic analysis of iodine overlay maps from dual-energy computed tomography in patients with resectable lung cancer [J].
Choe, Jooae ;
Lee, Sang Min ;
Do, Kyung-Hyun ;
Lee, Jung Bok ;
Lee, Sang Min ;
Lee, June-Goo ;
Seo, Joon Beom .
EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2019, 29 (02) :915-923
[7]   New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: Revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1) [J].
Eisenhauer, E. A. ;
Therasse, P. ;
Bogaerts, J. ;
Schwartz, L. H. ;
Sargent, D. ;
Ford, R. ;
Dancey, J. ;
Arbuck, S. ;
Gwyther, S. ;
Mooney, M. ;
Rubinstein, L. ;
Shankar, L. ;
Dodd, L. ;
Kaplan, R. ;
Lacombe, D. ;
Verweij, J. .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2009, 45 (02) :228-247
[8]   Can radiomics personalise immunotherapy? [J].
El Naqa, Issam ;
Ten Haken, Randall K. .
LANCET ONCOLOGY, 2018, 19 (09) :1138-1139
[9]   Melanoma Epidemiology and Early Detection in Europe: Diversity and Disparities [J].
Forsea, Ana-Maria .
DERMATOLOGY PRACTICAL & CONCEPTUAL, 2020, 10 (03)
[10]   Radiomics: Images Are More than Pictures, They Are Data [J].
Gillies, Robert J. ;
Kinahan, Paul E. ;
Hricak, Hedvig .
RADIOLOGY, 2016, 278 (02) :563-577