?Carbon Bombs?-Mapping key fossil fuel projects

被引:31
|
作者
Kuhne, Kjell [1 ,2 ]
Bartsch, Nils [3 ]
Higson, Julia [5 ]
Tate, Ryan Driskell [4 ]
Habet, Andre [6 ]
机构
[1] Univ Leeds, Sch Geog, Leeds, England
[2] Leave Ground Initiat, Radebeul, Germany
[3] Urgewald, Berlin, Germany
[4] Global Energy Monitor, San Francisco, CA USA
[5] Univ British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
[6] Syracuse Univ, Syracuse, NY USA
关键词
Supply side mitigation; Carbon bombs; Carbon budget; Harvest mode; Fossil fuels; Climate change; SOCIAL-MOVEMENTS; FUTURE; RESOURCES; POLICY; RISK;
D O I
10.1016/j.enpol.2022.112950
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Meeting the Paris targets requires reducing both fossil fuel demand and supply, and closing the "production gap" between climate targets and energy policy. But there is no supply-side mitigation roadmap yet. We need criteria to decide where to focus efforts. Here, we identify the 425 biggest fossil fuel extraction projects globally (defined as >1 gigaton potential CO2 emissions). We list these "carbon bombs" by name, show in which countries they are located and calculate their potential emissions which combined exceed the global 1.5 degrees C carbon budget by a factor of two. Already producing carbon bombs account for a significant percentage of global fossil fuel extraction. But 40% of carbon bombs have not yet started extraction. Climate change mitigation efforts cannot ignore carbon bombs. Defusing them could become an important dimension of climate change mitigation policy and activism towards meeting the Paris targets. So far, few actors, mainly from civil society, are working on defusing carbon bombs, but they are focussing on a very limited number of them. We outline a priority agenda where the key strategies are avoiding the activation of new carbon bombs and putting existing ones into "harvest mode".
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Global carbon budgets and the viability of new fossil fuel projects
    Jaccard, Mark
    Hoffele, James
    Jaccard, Torsten
    CLIMATIC CHANGE, 2018, 150 (1-2) : 15 - 28
  • [2] Global carbon budgets and the viability of new fossil fuel projects
    Mark Jaccard
    James Hoffele
    Torsten Jaccard
    Climatic Change, 2018, 150 : 15 - 28
  • [3] Movements shaping climate futures: A systematic mapping of protests against fossil fuel and low-carbon energy projects
    Temper, Leah
    Avila, Sofia
    Del Bene, Daniela
    Gobby, Jennifer
    Kosoy, Nicolas
    Le Billon, Philippe
    Martinez-Alier, Joan
    Perkins, Patricia
    Roy, Brototi
    Scheidel, Arnim
    Walter, Mariana
    ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2020, 15 (12)
  • [4] On the debate over new fossil fuel projects
    Ormiston, John
    NEW SCIENTIST, 2021, 245 (3353) : 28 - 28
  • [5] UK spends billions on fossil fuel projects abroad
    Vaughan, Adam
    NEW SCIENTIST, 2019, 243 (3240) : 8 - 8
  • [6] No new fossil fuel projects: The norm we need
    Green, Fergus
    Bois von Kursk, Olivier
    Muttitt, Greg
    Pye, Steve
    SCIENCE, 2024, 384 (6699) : 954 - 957
  • [7] The carbon-free home: 35 remodeling projects to help kick the fossil-fuel habit
    Ellis, Karen
    LIBRARY JOURNAL, 2008, 133 (14) : 156 - 156
  • [8] Professionals must refuse to work on new fossil fuel projects
    Watterson, Andrew
    BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2023, 382
  • [9] Multi-fuel biomass boilers, the key alternative to fossil fuel boilers
    De la Croix, Bernard
    INTERNATIONAL SUGAR JOURNAL, 2010, 112 (1341): : 529 - 532
  • [10] Atmospheric Lifetime of Fossil Fuel Carbon Dioxide
    Archer, David
    Eby, Michael
    Brovkin, Victor
    Ridgwell, Andy
    Cao, Long
    Mikolajewicz, Uwe
    Caldeira, Ken
    Matsumoto, Katsumi
    Munhoven, Guy
    Montenegro, Alvaro
    Tokos, Kathy
    ANNUAL REVIEW OF EARTH AND PLANETARY SCIENCES, 2009, 37 : 117 - 134