People's Avoidance of Neighboring Agricultural Urban Green Infrastructure: Evidence from a Choice Experiment

被引:3
作者
Kyoi, Shinsuke [1 ]
机构
[1] Kyoto Univ, Grad Sch Agr, Div Nat Resource Econ, Kyoto 6068502, Japan
关键词
urban green infrastructure; agricultural UGI; willingness to pay; choice experiment; proximity; spatial autocorrelation; ECOSYSTEM SERVICES; ECONOMIC VALUATION; ELECTRIC VEHICLES; CITIES; BIODIVERSITY; PREFERENCES; AMENITY; FOREST; MODEL; MULTIFUNCTIONALITY;
D O I
10.3390/su13126930
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
This study evaluates people's preferences regarding the proximity of their residence to agricultural urban green infrastructure (UGI), such as agricultural land and satoyama, and discusses the availability of these types of land as UGI. UGI is vital for reducing the negative environmental impacts of urban areas, as these impacts are too large to ignore. In this study, we conducted an online survey and a choice experiment to investigate people's perceptions regarding the proximity of their residence to agricultural UGI (AUGI). The respondents of the choice experiment were 802 inhabitants of Ishikawa Prefecture, Japan, which has rich agricultural resources. To examine explicitly the spatial autocorrelation of people's preferences, in this study, we used the spatial econometrics method. The main empirical findings are that people prefer agricultural land far away from their residence-more than 1000 m, not within 1000 m-which reflects the not-in-my-backyard phenomenon. Meanwhile, people's preferences regarding proximity to satoyama are complicated and their preferences are positively spatially autocorrelated. The results indicate that policymakers and urban planners should manage and provide AUGI far away from residential areas; otherwise, they must address people's avoidance of neighboring AUGI.
引用
收藏
页数:26
相关论文
共 70 条
  • [1] Ackerman K, 2014, ECON SOC REV, V45, P189
  • [2] Reconnecting Cities to the Biosphere: Stewardship of Green Infrastructure and Urban Ecosystem Services
    Andersson, Erik
    Barthel, Stephan
    Borgstrom, Sara
    Colding, Johan
    Elmqvist, Thomas
    Folke, Carl
    Gren, Asa
    [J]. AMBIO, 2014, 43 (04) : 445 - 453
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2013, Green Infrastructure (GI) - Enhancing Europes Natural Capital
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2018, NGEN 1 2 0 US MAN RE
  • [5] Anselin L, 2002, AGR ECON-BLACKWELL, V27, P247, DOI 10.1111/j.1574-0862.2002.tb00120.x
  • [6] Urban morphology parameterization for assessing the effects of housing blocks layouts on air temperature in the Euro-Mediterranean context
    Apreda, Carmela
    Reder, Alfredo
    Mercogliano, Paola
    [J]. ENERGY AND BUILDINGS, 2020, 223 (223)
  • [7] Revealing lay people's perceptions of forest biodiversity value components and their application in valuation method
    Bakhtiari, Fatemeh
    Jacobsen, Jette Bredahl
    Strange, Niels
    Helles, Finn
    [J]. GLOBAL ECOLOGY AND CONSERVATION, 2014, 1 : 27 - 42
  • [8] Benedict M.A., 2012, GREEN INFRASTRUCTURE
  • [9] What Have We Learned from Over 20 Years of Farmland Amenity Valuation Research in North America?
    Bergstrom, John C.
    Ready, Richard C.
    [J]. REVIEW OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 2009, 31 (01): : 21 - 49
  • [10] Urban greening to cool towns and cities: A systematic review of the empirical evidence
    Bowler, Diana E.
    Buyung-Ali, Lisette
    Knight, Teri M.
    Pullin, Andrew S.
    [J]. LANDSCAPE AND URBAN PLANNING, 2010, 97 (03) : 147 - 155