Post-publication filtering and evaluation: Faculty of 1000

被引:28
作者
Wets, K [1 ]
Weedon, D
Velterop, J
机构
[1] Biol Reports Ltd, London, England
[2] BioMed Cent Ltd, London, England
关键词
D O I
10.1087/095315103322421982
中图分类号
G25 [图书馆学、图书馆事业]; G35 [情报学、情报工作];
学科分类号
1205 ; 120501 ;
摘要
Faculty of 1000 (www.facultyof1000.com) is a new on-line literature awareness and assessment service of research papers, on the basis of selections by 1400 of the world's top biologists, that combines metrics with judgement. The service offers a systematic and comprehensive form of post-publication peer review that focuses on the best papers regardless of the journal in which they are published. It is now possible to draw some conclusions about how this new form of post-publication peer review meets the needs of scientists, and the organizations that fund them, in practice. In addition, inferences about the relative importance of journals are set out, which should also interest publishers and librarians.
引用
收藏
页码:249 / 258
页数:10
相关论文
共 19 条
[1]  
CLARKE T, 2003, NATURE 0522
[2]   Challenging the tyranny of impact factors [J].
Colquhoun, D .
NATURE, 2003, 423 (6939) :479-479
[3]   Improving science through online commentary [J].
Eagleman, DM ;
Holcombe, AO .
NATURE, 2003, 423 (6935) :15-15
[4]  
ELMUNSHID H, EVALUATION PEER REV
[5]  
Guedon J.-C., 2001, In Oldenburg's long shadow: librarians, research scientists, publishers, and the control of scientific publishing
[6]  
HARNAD S, 1998, NATURE 1105
[7]   Impact factors: target the funding bodies [J].
Insall, R .
NATURE, 2003, 423 (6940) :585-585
[8]   The politics of publication - Authors, reviewers and editors must act to protect the quality of research. [J].
Lawrence, PA .
NATURE, 2003, 422 (6929) :259-261
[9]  
LAWRENCE S, NATURE
[10]   Online comment could promote unfair criticism [J].
Lumsden, A ;
Raff, M ;
Sanes, JR .
NATURE, 2003, 423 (6943) :918-918