The influence of the selection of macronutrients coupled with dietary energy density on the performance of broiler chickens

被引:4
|
作者
Liu, Sonia Y. [1 ,2 ]
Chrystal, Peter V. [3 ]
Cowieson, Aaron J. [1 ,4 ]
Truong, Ha H. [1 ,5 ]
Moss, Amy F. [1 ]
Selle, Peter H. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sydney, Fac Sci, Sydney Sch Vet Sci, Poultry Res Fdn, Camden, NSW, Australia
[2] Univ Sydney, Fac Sci, Sch Life & Environm Sci, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[3] Baiada Poultry Pty Ltd, Pendle Hill, Australia
[4] DSM Nutr Prod, Kaiseraugst, Switzerland
[5] Univ New England, Poultry Cooperat Res Ctr, Armidale, NSW, Australia
来源
PLOS ONE | 2017年 / 12卷 / 10期
关键词
NUTRIENT UTILIZATION; GEOMETRIC ANALYSIS; PARTICLE-SIZE; PROTEIN; GROWTH;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0185480
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
A total of 360 male Ross 308 broiler chickens were used in a feeding study to assess the influence of macronutrients and energy density on feed intakes from 10 to 31 days post-hatch. The study comprised ten dietary treatments from five dietary combinations and two feeding approaches: sequential and choice feeding. The study included eight experimental diets and each dietary combination was made from three experimental diets. Choice fed birds selected between three diets in separate feed trays at the same time; whereas the three diets were offered to sequentially fed birds on an alternate basis during the experimental period. There were no differences between starch and protein intakes between choice and sequentially fed birds (P > 0.05) when broiler chickens selected between diets with different starch, protein and lipid concentrations. When broiler chickens selected between diets with different starch and protein but similar lipid concentrations, both sequentially and choice fed birds selected similar ratios of starch and protein intake (P > 0.05). However, when broiler chickens selected from diets with different protein and lipid but similar starch concentrations, choice fed birds had higher lipid intake (129 versus 118 g/bird, P = 0.027) and selected diets with lower protein concentrations (258 versus 281 g/kg, P = 0.042) than birds offered sequential diet options. Choice fed birds had greater intakes of the high energy diet (1471 g/bird, P < 0.0001) than low energy (197 g/bird) or medium energy diets (663 g/bird) whilst broiler chickens were offered diets with different energy densities but high crude protein (300 g/kg) or digestible lysine (17.5 g/kg) concentrations. Choice fed birds had lower FCR (1.217 versus 1.327 g/g, P < 0.0001) and higher carcass yield (88.1 versus 87.3%, P = 0.012) than sequentially fed birds. This suggests that the dietary balance between protein and energy is essential for optimal feed conversion efficiency. The intake path of macronutrients from 10-31 days in choice and sequential feeding groups were plotted and compared with the null path if broiler chickens selected equal amounts of the three diets in the combination. Regardless of feeding regimen, the intake paths of starch and protein are very close to the null path; however, lipid and protein intake paths in choice fed birds are father from the null path than sequentially fed birds.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Dietary camelina meal versus flaxseed with and without supplemental copper for broiler chickens: Live performance and processing yield
    Pekel, A. Y.
    Patterson, P. H.
    Hulet, R. M.
    Acar, N.
    Cravener, T. L.
    Dowler, D. B.
    Hunter, J. M.
    POULTRY SCIENCE, 2009, 88 (11) : 2392 - 2398
  • [32] Effects of Dietary Isoleucine Supplementation on the Production Performance, Health Status and Cecal Microbiota of Arbor Acre Broiler Chickens
    Liu, Hengchen
    Sun, Jianli
    Jiang, Shuzhen
    Jiao, Ning
    Huang, Libo
    Yuan, Xuejun
    Guan, Qinglin
    Li, Yang
    Yang, Weiren
    MICROORGANISMS, 2023, 11 (02)
  • [33] Effect of dietary folic acid and energy density on immune response, gut morphology, and oxidative status in blood and breast muscle of broiler chickens
    Akinyemi, Fisayo T.
    Adewole, Deborah I.
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2022, 102 (02) : 243 - 254
  • [34] The effects of dietary energy and amino acid profiles on broiler performance
    Payne, R. L.
    Lemme, A.
    Kemp, C.
    Kenny, M.
    Fisher, C.
    POULTRY SCIENCE, 2006, 85 : 189 - 189
  • [35] Effect of Dietary Inclusion of Alfalfa Polysaccharide on Performance and Immune System Efficacy of Broiler Chickens
    Dong, Yongjun
    Wang, Lirong
    Zhang, Mengting
    Zhang, Kai
    Zhang, Shouping
    KAFKAS UNIVERSITESI VETERINER FAKULTESI DERGISI, 2024, 30 (03) : 335 - 340
  • [36] Influence of dietary Chlorella vulgaris and carbohydrate-active enzymes on growth performance, meat quality and lipid composition of broiler chickens
    Alfaia, C. M.
    Pestana, J. M.
    Rodrigues, M.
    Coelho, D.
    Aires, M. J.
    Ribeiro, D. M.
    Major, V. T.
    Martins, C. F.
    Santos, H.
    Lopes, P. A.
    Lemos, J. P. C.
    Fontes, C. M. G. A.
    Lordelo, M. M.
    Prates, J. A. M.
    POULTRY SCIENCE, 2021, 100 (02) : 926 - 937
  • [37] Influence of feed form on the apparent metabolisable energy of feed ingredients for broiler chickens
    Khalil, M. M.
    Abdollahi, M. R.
    Zaefarian, F.
    Ravindran, V
    ANIMAL FEED SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2021, 271
  • [38] Box-Behnken optimisation of growth performance, plasma metabolites and carcass traits as influenced by dietary energy, amino acid and starch to lipid ratios in broiler chickens
    Liu, Sonia Y.
    Naranjo, Victor D.
    Chrystal, Peter V.
    Buyse, Johan
    Selle, Peter H.
    PLOS ONE, 2019, 14 (03):
  • [39] Influence of in ovo threonine on growth performance, immunocompetence and carcass characteristics in broiler chickens
    Alabi, J. O.
    Bhanja, S. K.
    Fafiolu, A. O.
    Oluwatosin, O. O.
    Onagbesan, O. M.
    Mehra, M.
    Goel, A.
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCES, 2020, 90 (12) : 1628 - 1637
  • [40] The impact of deoxynivalenol, fumonisins, and their combination on performance, nutrient, and energy digestibility in broiler chickens
    Liu, J. D.
    Doupovec, B.
    Schatzmayr, D.
    Murugesan, G. R.
    Bortoluzzi, C.
    Villegas, A. M.
    Applegate, T. J.
    POULTRY SCIENCE, 2020, 99 (01) : 272 - 279