Multimodality approach to mediastinal staging in non-small cell lung cancer. Faults and benefits of PET-CT: a randomised trial

被引:58
作者
Fischer, Barbara M. [1 ,2 ]
Mortensen, Jann [1 ]
Hansen, Hanne [3 ]
Vilmann, Peter [4 ]
Larsen, Soren S. [5 ]
Loft, Annika [1 ]
Bertelsen, Anne K. [1 ]
Ravn, Jesper [6 ]
Clementsen, Paul [7 ]
Hoegholm, Asbjorn [8 ]
Larsen, Klaus R. [9 ]
Dirksen, Asger [7 ]
Skov, Birgit G. [10 ]
Krasnik, Mark [11 ]
Hojgaard, Liselotte [1 ]
Lassen, Ulrik [12 ]
机构
[1] Copenhagen Univ Hosp, Rigshosp, Dept Clin Physiol Nucl Med & PET, Copenhagen, Denmark
[2] Univ Copenhagen, Hvidovre Hosp, Dept Clin Physiol & Nucl Med, DK-2650 Hvidovre, Denmark
[3] Bispebjerg Hosp, Dept Radiol, DK-2400 Copenhagen, Denmark
[4] Gentofte Univ Hosp, Endoscop Unit, Herlev Hosp, Dept Surg, Hellerup, Denmark
[5] Univ Copenhagen, Hvidovre Hosp, Dept Surg, DK-2650 Hvidovre, Denmark
[6] Copenhagen Univ Hosp, Rigshosp, Dept Thorac Surg, Copenhagen, Denmark
[7] Gentofte Univ Hosp, Dept Pulmonol, Hellerup, Denmark
[8] Naestved Hosp, Dept Pulmonol, Naestved, Denmark
[9] Bispebjerg Hosp, Dept Pulmonol, DK-2400 Copenhagen, Denmark
[10] Bispebjerg Hosp, Dept Pathol, DK-2400 Copenhagen, Denmark
[11] Copenhagen Univ Hosp, Dept Dev & Qual, Copenhagen, Denmark
[12] Copenhagen Univ Hosp, Rigshosp, Dept Oncol, Copenhagen, Denmark
关键词
POSITRON-EMISSION-TOMOGRAPHY; GUIDELINES 2ND EDITION; INVOLVEMENT;
D O I
10.1136/thx.2010.154476
中图分类号
R56 [呼吸系及胸部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Background Correct mediastinal staging is a cornerstone in the treatment of patients with non-small cell lung cancer. A large range of methods is available for this purpose, making the process of adequate staging complex. The objective of this study was to describe faults and benefits of positron emission tomography (PET)-CT in multimodality mediastinal staging. Methods A randomised clinical trial was conducted including patients with a verified diagnosis of non-small cell lung cancer, who were considered operable. Patients were assigned to staging with PET-CT (PET-CT group) followed by invasive staging (mediastinoscopy and/or endoscopic ultrasound with fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA)) or invasive staging without prior PET-CT (conventional work up (CWU) group). Mediastinal involvement (dichotomising N stage into N0-1 versus N2-3) was described according to CT, PET-CT, mediastinoscopy, EUS-FNA and consensus (based on all available information), and compared with the final N stage as verified by thoracotomy or a conclusive invasive diagnostic procedure. Results A total of 189 patients were recruited, 98 in the PET-CT group and 91 in the CWU group. In an intention-to-treat analysis the overall accuracy of the consensus N stage was not significantly higher in the PET-CT group than in the CWU group (90% (95% confidence interval 82% to 95%) vs 85% (95% CI 77% to 91%)). Excluding the patients in whom PET-CT was not performed (n=14) the difference was significant (95% (95% CI 88% to 98%) vs 85% (95% CI 77% to 91%), p=0.034). This was mainly based on a higher sensitivity of the staging approach including PET-CT. Conclusion An approach to lung cancer staging with PET-CT improves discrimination between N0-1 and N2-3. In those without enlarged lymph nodes and a PET-negative mediastinum the patient may proceed directly to surgery. However, enlarged lymph nodes on CT needs confirmation independent of PET findings and a positive finding on PET-CT needs confirmation before a decision on surgery is made.
引用
收藏
页码:294 / 300
页数:7
相关论文
共 18 条
  • [1] Pattern and predictors of occult mediastinal lymph node involvement in non-small cell lung cancer patients with negative mediastinal uptake on positron emission tomography
    Al-Sarraf, Nael
    Aziz, Rashid
    Gately, Kathy
    Lucey, Julie
    Wilson, Lorraine
    McGovern, Eillish
    Young, Vincent
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CARDIO-THORACIC SURGERY, 2008, 33 (01) : 104 - 109
  • [2] Altman DG, 1991, PRACTICAL STAT MED R, P396
  • [3] Altman DG., 1991, Practical statistics for medical research, P229, DOI [DOI 10.1201/9780429258589, https://doi.org/10.1201/9780429258589]
  • [4] Towards a minimally invasive staging strategy in NSCLC:: analysis of PET positive mediastinal lesions by EUS-FNA
    Annema, JT
    Hoekstra, OS
    Smit, EF
    Veseliç, M
    Versteegh, MIM
    Rabe, KF
    [J]. LUNG CANCER, 2004, 44 (01) : 53 - 60
  • [5] *DAN LUNG CANC GRO, 2001, LUNG CANC DIAGN THER
  • [6] The size of mediastinal lymph nodes and its relation with metastatic involvement: a meta-analysis
    de Langen, AJ
    Raijmakers, P
    Riphagen, I
    Paul, MA
    Hoekstra, OS
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CARDIO-THORACIC SURGERY, 2006, 29 (01) : 26 - 29
  • [7] ESTS guidelines for preoperative lymph node staging for non-small cell lung cancer
    De Leyn, Paul
    Lardinois, Didier
    Van Schil, Paul E.
    Rami-Porta, Ramon
    Passlick, Bernward
    Zielinski, Marcin
    Walter, David A.
    Lerut, Tony
    Weder, Walter
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CARDIO-THORACIC SURGERY, 2007, 32 (01) : 1 - 8
  • [8] Invasive mediastinal staging of lung cancer - ACCP evidence-based clinical practice guidelines (2nd edition)
    Detterbeck, Frank C.
    Jantz, Michael A.
    Wallace, Michael
    Vansteenkiste, Johan
    Silvestri, Gerard A.
    [J]. CHEST, 2007, 132 (03) : 202S - 220S
  • [9] Preoperative Staging of Lung Cancer with Combined PET-CT.
    Fischer, Barbara
    Lassen, Ulrik
    Mortensen, Jann
    Larsen, Soren
    Loft, Annika
    Bertelsen, Anne
    Ravn, Jesper
    Clementsen, Paul
    Hogholm, Asbjorn
    Larsen, Klaus
    Rasmussen, Torben
    Keiding, Susanne
    Dirksen, Asger
    Gerke, Oke
    Skov, Birgit
    Steffensen, Ida
    Hansen, Hanne
    Vilmann, Peter
    Jacobsen, Grete
    Backer, Vibeke
    Maltbaek, Niels
    Pedersen, Jesper
    Madsen, Henrik
    Nielsen, Henrik
    Hojgaard, Liselotte
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2009, 361 (01) : 32 - 39
  • [10] The future in diagnosis and staging of lung cancer: Positron emission tomography
    Fischer, Barbara M.
    Mortensen, Jann
    [J]. RESPIRATION, 2006, 73 (03) : 267 - 276