A maximum entropy model for predicting wild boar distribution in Spain

被引:39
作者
Bosch, Jaime [1 ]
Mardones, Fernando [2 ]
Perez, Andres [2 ,3 ]
de la Torre, Ana [1 ]
Jesus Munoz, Maria [1 ]
机构
[1] Anim Hlth Res Ctr CISA INIA, Epidemiol & Environm Hlth Dept, Madrid 28130, Spain
[2] Univ Calif Davis, Sch Vet Med, CADMS, Dept Med & Epidemiol, Davis, CA 95616 USA
[3] Natl Sci & Tech Res Council CONICET, RA-1917 Buenos Aires, DF, Argentina
关键词
Sus scrofa; environmental suitability; MaxEnt; spatial distribution; wildlife management; geographic information; SPECIES DISTRIBUTION; SUS-SCROFA; AGROFORESTRY SYSTEMS; BIOTIC INTERACTIONS; IMPROVE PREDICTION; POPULATION-MODELS; CROP DAMAGE; FERAL PIGS; CONSERVATION; PERFORMANCE;
D O I
10.5424/sjar/2014124-5717
中图分类号
S [农业科学];
学科分类号
09 ;
摘要
Wild boar (Sus scrofa) populations in many areas of the Palearctic including the Iberian Peninsula have grown continuously over the last century. This increase has led to numerous different types of conflicts due to the damage these mammals can cause to agriculture, the problems they create in the conservation of natural areas, and the threat they pose to animal health. In the context of both wildlife management and the design of health programs for disease control, it is essential to know how wild boar are distributed on a large spatial scale. Given that the quantifying of the distribution of wild species using census techniques is virtually impossible in the case of large-scale studies, modeling techniques have thus to be used instead to estimate animals' distributions, densities, and abundances. In this study, the potential distribution of wild boar in Spain was predicted by integrating data of presence and environmental variables into a MaxEnt approach. We built and tested models using 100 bootstrapped replicates. For each replicate or simulation, presence data was divided into two subsets that were used for model fitting (60% of the data) and cross-validation (40% of the data). The final model was found to be accurate with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) value of 0.79. Six explanatory variables for predicting wild boar distribution were identified on the basis of the percentage of their contribution to the model. The model exhibited a high degree of predictive accuracy, which has been confirmed by its agreement with satellite images and field surveys.
引用
收藏
页码:984 / 999
页数:16
相关论文
共 98 条
[31]  
Garcia-Anton M., 2002, La Diversidad Biologica de Espaha, P45
[32]   Predictive habitat distribution models in ecology [J].
Guisan, A ;
Zimmermann, NE .
ECOLOGICAL MODELLING, 2000, 135 (2-3) :147-186
[33]   Predicting species distribution: offering more than simple habitat models [J].
Guisan, A ;
Thuiller, W .
ECOLOGY LETTERS, 2005, 8 (09) :993-1009
[34]  
Hansen MC, 2003, EARTH INTERACT, V7
[35]   Relative influences of current and historical factors on mammal and bird diversity patterns in deglaciated North America [J].
Hawkins, BA ;
Porter, EE .
GLOBAL ECOLOGY AND BIOGEOGRAPHY, 2003, 12 (06) :475-481
[36]   Pseudoreplication revisited [J].
Heffner, RA ;
Butler, MJ ;
Reilly, CK .
ECOLOGY, 1996, 77 (08) :2558-2562
[37]   Biotic interactions improve prediction of boreal bird distributions at macro-scales [J].
Heikkinen, Risto K. ;
Luoto, Miska ;
Virkkala, Raimo ;
Pearson, Richard G. ;
Korber, Jan-Hendrik .
GLOBAL ECOLOGY AND BIOGEOGRAPHY, 2007, 16 (06) :754-763
[38]   The effect of sample size and species characteristics on performance of different species distribution modeling methods [J].
Hernandez, Pilar A. ;
Graham, Catherine H. ;
Master, Lawrence L. ;
Albert, Deborah L. .
ECOGRAPHY, 2006, 29 (05) :773-785
[39]   Fruits and roots:: wild boar foods during the cold season in the southwestern Pyrenees [J].
Herrero, J ;
Irizar, I ;
Laskurain, NA ;
García-Serrano, A ;
García-González, R .
ITALIAN JOURNAL OF ZOOLOGY, 2005, 72 (01) :49-52
[40]   Diet of wild boar Sus scrofa L. and crop damage in an intensive agroecosystem [J].
Herrero, Juan ;
Garcia-Serrano, Alicia ;
Couto, Sergio ;
Ortuno, Vicente M. ;
Garcia-Gonzalez, Ricardo .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF WILDLIFE RESEARCH, 2006, 52 (04) :245-250