Has Toxicity Testing Moved into the 21st Century? A Survey and Analysis of Perceptions in the Field of Toxicology

被引:1
|
作者
Zaunbrecher, Virginia [1 ,2 ]
Beryt, Elizabeth [3 ]
Parodi, Daniela [4 ]
Telesca, Donatello [5 ]
Doherty, Joseph [2 ]
Malloy, Timothy [1 ,2 ,6 ]
Allard, Patrick [1 ,4 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Sustainable Technol & Policy Program, Los Angeles, CA 90095 USA
[2] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Sch Law, Los Angeles, CA 90095 USA
[3] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Luskin Sch Publ Affairs, Los Angeles, CA 90095 USA
[4] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Inst Soc & Genet, 3360 Life Sci Bldg, Los Angeles, CA 90095 USA
[5] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Dept Biostat, UCLA Fielding Sch Publ Hlth, Los Angeles, CA 90095 USA
[6] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Dept Environm Hlth Sci, UCLA Fielding Sch Publ Hlth, Los Angeles, CA 90095 USA
关键词
RISK-ASSESSMENT; DECISIONS; CHEMICALS; VISION;
D O I
10.1289/EHP1435
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND: Ten years ago, leaders in the field of toxicology called for a transformation of the discipline and a shift from primarily relying on traditional animal testing to incorporating advances in biotechnology and predictive methodologies into alternative testing strategies (ATS). Governmental agencies and academic and industry partners initiated programs to support such a transformation, but a decade later, the outcomes of these efforts are not well understood. OBJECTIVES: We aimed to assess the use of ATS and the perceived barriers and drivers to their adoption by toxicologists and by others working in, or closely linked with, the field of toxicology. METHODS: We surveyed 1,381 toxicologists and experts in associated fields regarding the viability and use of ATS and the perceived barriers and drivers of ATS for a range of applications. We performed ranking, hierarchical clustering, and correlation analyses of the survey data. RESULTS: Many respondents indicated that they were already using ATS, or believed that ATS were already viable approaches, for toxicological assessment of one or more end points in their primary area of interest or concern (26-86%, depending on the specific ATS/application pair). However, the proportions of respondents reporting use of ATS in the previous 12 mo were smaller (4.5-41%). Concern about regulatory acceptance was the most commonly cited factor inhibiting the adoption of ATS, and a variety of technical concerns were also cited as significant barriers to ATS viability. The factors most often cited as playing a significant role (currently or in the future) in driving the adoption of ATS were the need for expedited toxicology information, the need for reduced toxicity testing costs, demand by regulatory agencies, and ethical or moral concerns. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings indicate that the transformation of the field of toxicology is partly implemented, but significant barriers to acceptance and adoption remain.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 23 条
  • [1] Computational Toxicology: Realizing the Promise of the Toxicity Testing in the 21st Century
    Rusyn, Ivan
    Daston, George P.
    ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH PERSPECTIVES, 2010, 118 (08) : 1047 - 1050
  • [2] TOXICITY TESTING IN THE 21ST CENTURY: A VISION AND A STRATEGY
    Krewski, Daniel
    Acosta, Daniel, Jr.
    Andersen, Melvin
    Anderson, Henry
    Bailar, John C., III
    Boekelheide, Kim
    Brent, Robert
    Charnley, Gail
    Cheung, Vivian G.
    Green, Sidney, Jr.
    Kelsey, Karl T.
    Kerkvliet, Nancy I.
    Li, Abby A.
    McCray, Lawrence
    Meyer, Otto
    Patterson, Reid D.
    Pennie, William
    Scala, Robert A.
    Solomon, Gina M.
    Stephens, Martin
    Yager, James
    Zeise, Lauren
    JOURNAL OF TOXICOLOGY AND ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH-PART B-CRITICAL REVIEWS, 2010, 13 (2-4): : 51 - 138
  • [3] Toxicity Testing in the 21st Century: A View from the Chemical Industry
    Bus, James S.
    Becker, Richard A.
    TOXICOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2009, 112 (02) : 297 - 302
  • [4] Toxicity testing in the 21st century - a view from BELLE
    Calabrese, Edward J.
    HUMAN & EXPERIMENTAL TOXICOLOGY, 2010, 29 (01) : 5 - 6
  • [5] Stem Cells for Next Level Toxicity Testing in the 21st Century
    Fritsche, Ellen
    Haarmann-Stemmann, Thomas
    Kapr, Julia
    Galanjuk, Saskia
    Hartmann, Julia
    Mertens, Peter R.
    Kaempfer, Angela A. M.
    Schins, Roel P. F.
    Tigges, Julia
    Koch, Katharina
    SMALL, 2021, 17 (15)
  • [6] AN ANIMAL PROTECTION PERSPECTIVE ON 21ST CENTURY TOXICOLOGY
    Stephens, Martin L.
    JOURNAL OF TOXICOLOGY AND ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH-PART B-CRITICAL REVIEWS, 2010, 13 (2-4): : 291 - 298
  • [7] The Vision of Toxicity Testing in the 21st Century: Moving from Discussion to Action
    Andersen, Melvin E.
    Krewski, Daniel
    TOXICOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2010, 117 (01) : 17 - 24
  • [8] Toxicity Testing in the 21st Century: Using the New Toxicity Testing Paradigm to Create a Taxonomy of Adverse Effects
    Boekelheide, Kim
    Campion, Sarah N.
    TOXICOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2010, 114 (01) : 20 - 24
  • [9] Bringing toxicology into the 21st century: A global call to action
    Seidle, T.
    Stephens, M. L.
    TOXICOLOGY IN VITRO, 2009, 23 (08) : 1576 - 1579
  • [10] Identification and Characterization of Adverse Effects in 21st Century Toxicology
    Keller, Douglas A.
    Juberg, Daland R.
    Catlin, Natasha
    Farland, William H.
    Hess, Frederick G.
    Wolf, Douglas C.
    Doerrer, Nancy G.
    TOXICOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2012, 126 (02) : 291 - 297