Energy Efficiency Comparison of Hydraulic Accumulators and Ultracapacitors

被引:20
作者
Leon-Quiroga, Jorge [1 ]
Newell, Brittany [1 ]
Krishnamurthy, Mahesh [2 ]
Gonzalez-Mancera, Andres [3 ]
Garcia-Bravo, Jose [1 ]
机构
[1] Purdue Univ, Purdue Polytech Sch Engn Technol, W Lafayette, IN 47907 USA
[2] Illinois Inst Technol, Dept Elect & Comp Engn, Chicago, IL 60616 USA
[3] Univ Los Andes, Dept Mech Engn, Bogota 111711, Colombia
关键词
efficiency; energy storage systems; electrical power systems; hydraulic power systems; hydraulic accumulator; ultracapacitor; STORAGE; PERFORMANCE; EXCAVATOR; POWER;
D O I
10.3390/en13071632
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
Energy regeneration systems are a key factor for improving energy efficiency in electrohydraulic machinery. This paper is focused on the study of electric energy storage systems (EESS) and hydraulic energy storage systems (HESS) for energy regeneration applications. Two test benches were designed and implemented to compare the performance of the systems under similar operating conditions. The electrical system was configured with a set of ultracapacitors, and the hydraulic system used a hydraulic accumulator. Both systems were designed to have the same energy storage capacity. Charge and discharge cycle experiments were performed for the two systems in order to compare their power density, energy density, cost, and efficiency. According to the experimentally obtained results, the power density in the hydraulic accumulator was 21.7% higher when compared with the ultracapacitors. Moreover, the cost/power ($/Watt) ratio in the hydraulic accumulator was 2.9 times smaller than a set of ultracapacitors of the same energy storage capacity. On the other hand, the energy density in the set of ultracapacitors was 9.4 times higher, and the cost/energy ($/kWh) ratio was 2.9 times smaller when compared with the hydraulic accumulator. Under the tested conditions, the estimated overall energy efficiency for the hydraulic accumulator was 87.7%, and the overall energy efficiency for the ultracapacitor was 78.7%.
引用
收藏
页数:23
相关论文
共 20 条
[1]   Reevaluation of Performance of Electric Double-layer Capacitors from Constant-current Charge/Discharge and Cyclic Voltammetry [J].
Allagui, Anis ;
Freeborn, Todd J. ;
Elwakil, Ahmed S. ;
Maundy, Brent J. .
SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2016, 6
[2]  
[Anonymous], SAE TECH PAP SER
[3]  
[Anonymous], AUTOM CONSTR
[4]  
[Anonymous], FLUID POWER ENG
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2019, Monthly Energy Review
[6]   Power and energy analysis of fractional-order electrical energy storage devices [J].
Fouda, M. E. ;
Elwakil, A. S. ;
Radwan, A. G. ;
Allagui, A. .
ENERGY, 2016, 111 :785-792
[7]   Estimating supercapacitor performance for embedded applications using fractional-order models [J].
Freeborn, T. J. .
ELECTRONICS LETTERS, 2016, 52 (17) :1478-1479
[8]   Energy storage and loss in fractional-order circuit elements [J].
Hartley, Tom T. ;
Veillette, Robert J. ;
Adams, Jay L. ;
Lorenzo, Carl F. .
IET CIRCUITS DEVICES & SYSTEMS, 2015, 9 (03) :227-235
[9]   Control of rubber tyred gantry crane with energy storage based on supercapacitor bank [J].
Kim, Sang-Min ;
Sul, Seung-Ki .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER ELECTRONICS, 2006, 21 (05) :1420-1427
[10]   Power Control Algorithm for Hybrid Excavator With Supercapacitor [J].
Kwon, Tae-Suk ;
Lee, Seon-Woo ;
Sul, Seung-Ki ;
Park, Cheol-Gyu ;
Kim, Nag-In ;
Kang, Byung-il ;
Hong, Min-seok .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INDUSTRY APPLICATIONS, 2010, 46 (04) :1447-1455