DOES EXPOSURE TO DIAGNOSTIC ULTRASOUND MODULATE HUMAN NERVE RESPONSES TO MAGNETIC STIMULATION?

被引:3
作者
Bailey, Neil W. [1 ]
Lewis, Philip M. [2 ,3 ]
Thomson, Richard H. S. [1 ]
Maller, Jerome J. [1 ]
Junor, Paul [1 ,4 ]
Fitzgerald, Paul B. [1 ]
机构
[1] Alfred & Monash Univ, Cent Clin Sch, Monash Alfred Psychiat Res Ctr, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[2] Alfred Hosp, Dept Neurosurg, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[3] Monash Univ, Cent Clin Sch, Dept Surg, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[4] La Trobe Univ, Coll Sci Engn & Hlth, Dept Elect Engn, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
基金
澳大利亚国家健康与医学研究理事会; 英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
Ultrasound; Magnetic stimulation; Electromyography; FOCUSED ULTRASOUND; TRANSCRANIAL ULTRASOUND; BRAIN-STIMULATION; LOW-INTENSITY; EXCITABILITY; PARAMETERS; CIRCUITS; SYSTEM;
D O I
10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2016.08.003
中图分类号
O42 [声学];
学科分类号
070206 ; 082403 ;
摘要
Ultrasound (US) at diagnostic frequency and power is known to alter nerve potentials; however, the precise mechanism of action is unknown. We investigated whether US alters resting nerve potential to lower the threshold for magnetic nerve stimulation. Seventeen healthy subjects were recruited. For each subject, a 1.5 MHz US imaging probe was placed onto the elbow with the beam directed at the ulnar nerve. The probe was coupled to the skin using standard acoustic coupling gel as would be done for a routine clinical US scan. Ulnar nerve stimulation was performed simultaneously with magnetic stimulation (MS). Successful magnetic stimulation of the ulnar nerve was confirmed with nerve potentials measured by electromyography. There was no significant change in electromyography signal when MS was performed during US exposure. US at the diagnostic frequency and power tested does not alter nerve thresholds with MS. Testing at other frequencies is required, however, before US is negated as a technique to modify MS thresholds. (E-mail: neilwbailey@gmail.com) (C) 2016 World Federation for Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology.
引用
收藏
页码:2950 / 2956
页数:7
相关论文
共 32 条
  • [1] Prenatal exposure to ultrasound waves impacts neuronal migration in mice
    Ang, Eugenius S. B. C., Jr.
    Gluncic, Vicko
    Duque, Alvaro
    Schafer, Mark E.
    Rakic, Pasko
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2006, 103 (34) : 12903 - 12910
  • [2] BARKER AT, 1987, NEUROSURGERY, V20, P100
  • [3] International recommendations and guidelines for the safe use of diagnostic ultrasound in medicine
    Barnett, SB
    Ter Haar, GR
    Ziskin, MC
    Rott, HD
    Duck, FA
    Maeda, K
    [J]. ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2000, 26 (03) : 355 - 366
  • [4] A review of low-intensity focused ultrasound pulsation
    Bystritsky, Alexander
    Korb, Alex S.
    Douglas, Pamela K.
    Cohen, Mark S.
    Melega, William P.
    Mulgaonkar, Amit P.
    DeSalles, Antonio
    Min, Byoung-Kyong
    Yoof, Seung-Schik
    [J]. BRAIN STIMULATION, 2011, 4 (03) : 125 - 136
  • [5] Realtime Control of Multiple-focus Phased Array Heating Patterns Based on Noninvasive Ultrasound Thermography
    Casper, Andrew
    Liu, Dalong
    Ebbini, Emad S.
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING, 2012, 59 (01) : 95 - 105
  • [6] Mechanical bioeffects of ultrasound
    Dalecki, D
    [J]. ANNUAL REVIEW OF BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING, 2004, 6 : 229 - 248
  • [7] THE SIGNIFICANCE OF MEMBRANE-CHANGES IN THE SAFE AND EFFECTIVE USE OF THERAPEUTIC AND DIAGNOSTIC ULTRASOUND
    DINNO, MA
    DYSON, M
    YOUNG, SR
    MORTIMER, AJ
    HART, J
    CRUM, LA
    [J]. PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 1989, 34 (11) : 1543 - 1552
  • [8] Fitzgerald PB, 2011, EXPERT REV MED DEVIC, V8, P85, DOI [10.1586/erd.10.57, 10.1586/ERD.10.57]
  • [9] Mechanical bioeffects from diagnostic ultrasound: AIUM consensus statements - Introduction
    Fowlkes, JB
    Holland, CK
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE, 2000, 19 (02) : 69 - 72
  • [10] Mirror, mirror on the wall: viewing a mirror reflection of unilateral hand movements facilitates ipsilateral M1 excitability
    Garry, MI
    Loftus, A
    Summers, JJ
    [J]. EXPERIMENTAL BRAIN RESEARCH, 2005, 163 (01) : 118 - 122