Views of commissioners, managers and healthcare professionals on the NHS Health Check programme: a systematic review

被引:10
作者
Mills, Katie [1 ]
Harte, Emma [2 ]
Martin, Adam [3 ]
MacLure, Calum [2 ]
Griffin, Simon J. [1 ,4 ]
Mant, Jonathan [1 ]
Meads, Catherine [5 ]
Saunders, Catherine L. [1 ]
Walter, Fiona M. [1 ]
Usher-Smith, Juliet A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Cambridge, Inst Publ Hlth, Primary Care Unit, Cambridge, England
[2] RAND Europe, Westbrook Ctr, Cambridge, England
[3] Univ Leeds, Leeds Inst Hlth Sci, Acad Unit Hlth Econ, Leeds, W Yorkshire, England
[4] Univ Cambridge, Inst Metab Sci, MRC Epidemiol Unit, Cambridge, England
[5] Anglia Ruskin Univ, Fac Hlth Social Care & Educ, Cambridge, England
来源
BMJ OPEN | 2017年 / 7卷 / 11期
关键词
GENERAL-PRACTITIONERS; CLINICAL-PRACTICE; ENGLAND;
D O I
10.1136/bmjopen-2017-018606
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective To synthesise data concerning the views of commissioners, managers and healthcare professionals towards the National Health Service (NHS) Health Check programme in general and the challenges faced when implementing it in practice. Design A systematic review of surveys and interview studies with a descriptive analysis of quantitative data and thematic synthesis of qualitative data. Data sources An electronic literature search of MEDLINE, Embase, Health Management Information Consortium, Cumulative Index of Nursing and Allied Health Literature, Global Health, PsycInfo, Web of Science, OpenGrey, the Cochrane Library, NHS Evidence, Google Scholar, Google, ClinicalTrials. gov and the International Standard Randomised Controlled Trial Number registry from 1 January 1996 to 9 November 2016 with no language restriction and manual screening of reference lists of all included papers. Inclusion criteria Primary research reporting views of commissioners, managers or healthcare professionals on the NHS Health Check programme and its implementation in practice. Results Of 18 524 citations, 15 articles met the inclusion criteria. There was evidence from both quantitative and qualitative studies that some commissioners and general practice (GP) healthcare professionals were enthusiastic about the programme, whereas others raised concerns around inequality of uptake, the evidence base and cost-effectiveness. In contrast, those working in pharmacies were all positive about programme benefits, citing opportunities for their business and staff. The main challenges to implementation were: difficulties with information technology and computer software, resistance to the programme from some GPs, the impact on workload and staffing, funding and training needs. Inadequate privacy was also a challenge in pharmacy and community settings, along with difficulty recruiting people eligible for Health Checks and poor public access to some venues. Conclusions The success of the NHS Health Check Programme relies on engagement by those responsible for its commissioning, management and delivery. Recognising and addressing the challenges identified in this review, in particular the concerns of GPs, are important for the future of the programme.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 45 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], PACK ESS NONC INT PR
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2017, CARD DIS RISK ASS RE
  • [3] [Anonymous], PUBL HLTH ENGL UND I
  • [4] [Anonymous], DEATH REG SUMM TABL
  • [5] [Anonymous], 2015, PRACT NURS
  • [6] [Anonymous], CARD DIS PREV PUBL H
  • [7] [Anonymous], INT J PHARM PRACT S2
  • [8] [Anonymous], CMAJ
  • [9] [Anonymous], NHS HLTH CHECK BEST
  • [10] [Anonymous], EVALUATION COMMISSIO