The atypia of undetermined significance/follicular lesion of undetermined significance:malignant ratio

被引:106
作者
Krane, Jeffrey F. [1 ]
VanderLaan, Paul A. [1 ]
Faquin, William C. [2 ]
Renshaw, Andrew A. [3 ]
机构
[1] Brigham & Womens Hosp, Dept Pathol, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[2] Massachusetts Gen Hosp, Dept Pathol, Boston, MA 02114 USA
[3] Baptist Hosp Miami, Dept Pathol, Miami, FL USA
关键词
thyroid gland; fine-needle aspiration; thyroid nodule; health care quality assurance; atypia; atypia of undetermined significance; follicular lesion of undetermined significance (AUS); Bethesda; FINE-NEEDLE-ASPIRATION; FOLLICULAR LESION; SYSTEM; CELLS; RISK;
D O I
10.1002/cncy.20192
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND: The Bethesda System (TBS) for reporting thyroid cytopathology introduced the atypia of undetermined significance/follicular lesion of undetermined significance (AUS) category, but did not provide adequate guidance for the appropriate use of this diagnosis. In the current study, the authors sought to identify an appropriate measure for AUS use based on experience to date with TBS. METHODS: The authors reviewed 8 series, including their own laboratory experiences, with a total of 30,466 thyroid aspirates classified within TBS. RESULTS: The median AUS rate was 9.9% with a range of 3.0% to 18.0%. Use of the individual diagnostic categories within TBS varied up to 12.7-fold. The ratio of "suspicious for follicular neoplasm" plus "suspicious for malignancy" to "malignant" (M) diagnoses varied the least (1.8-fold). The AUS: M ratio provided a suitable measure of assessing AUS use, with a median ratio of 2.0 and a range of 0.5 to 4.9. CONCLUSIONS: Based on available studies, an AUS: M ratio of 1.0 to 3.0 is recommended. AUS: M ratios > 3.0 are likely because of overdiagnosis of AUS or underdiagnosis of M. AUS: M ratios < 1.0 are mostly due to low AUS rates, at the likely expense of sensitivity. Cancer (Cancer Cytopathol) 2012; 120: 111-6. (C) 2011 American Cancer Society.
引用
收藏
页码:111 / 116
页数:6
相关论文
共 17 条
[1]   Diagnostic Criteria and Risk-Adapted Approach to Indeterminate Thyroid Cytodiagnosis [J].
Abele, John S. ;
Levine, Robert A. .
CANCER CYTOPATHOLOGY, 2010, 118 (06) :415-422
[2]  
Ali SZ., 2010, The Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology
[3]   ATYPICAL SQUAMOUS CELLS OF UNDETERMINED SIGNIFICANCE - INTERLABORATORY COMPARISON AND QUALITY ASSURANCE MONITORS [J].
DAVEY, DD ;
NARYSHKIN, S ;
NIELSEN, ML ;
KLINE, TS .
DIAGNOSTIC CYTOPATHOLOGY, 1994, 11 (04) :390-396
[4]   Fine-Needle Aspiration of Follicular Patterned Lesions of the Thyroid: Diagnosis, Management, and Follow-Up According to National Cancer Institute (NCI) Recommendations [J].
Faquin, William C. ;
Baloch, Zubair W. .
DIAGNOSTIC CYTOPATHOLOGY, 2010, 38 (10) :731-739
[5]  
Jing X., 2010, Diagnostic Cytopathology
[6]   Malignancy Risk for Fine-Needle Aspiration of Thyroid Lesions According to The Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology [J].
Jo, Vickie Y. ;
Stelow, Edward B. ;
Dustin, Simone M. ;
Hanley, Krisztina Z. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PATHOLOGY, 2010, 134 (03) :450-456
[7]   Surgical Results of Thyroid Nodules according to a Management Guideline Based on the BRAFV600E Mutation Status [J].
Kim, Suk Kyeong ;
Hwang, Tae Sook ;
Yoo, Young Bum ;
Han, Hye Seung ;
Kim, Dong-Lim ;
Song, Kee-Ho ;
Lim, So Duk ;
Kim, Wan Seop ;
Paik, Nam Sun .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM, 2011, 96 (03) :658-664
[8]   Implications of the Proposed Thyroid Fine-Needle Aspiration Category of "Follicular Lesion of Undetermined Significance": A Five-Year Multi-Institutional Analysis [J].
Layfield, Lester J. ;
Morton, M. J. ;
Cramer, Harvey M. ;
Hirschowitz, Sharon .
DIAGNOSTIC CYTOPATHOLOGY, 2009, 37 (10) :710-714
[9]   Evidence-Based Evaluation of the Risks of Malignancy Predicted by Thyroid Fine-Needle Aspiration Biopsies [J].
Marchevsky, A. M. ;
Walts, A. E. ;
Bose, S. ;
Gupta, R. ;
Fan, X. ;
Frishberg, D. ;
Scharre, K. ;
Zhai, J. .
DIAGNOSTIC CYTOPATHOLOGY, 2010, 38 (04) :252-259
[10]  
Milas M, 2010, SURGERY, V148, P1272