Exploring the utility of preference assessments in organizational behavior management

被引:13
作者
Waldvogel, Jamie M. [1 ]
Dixon, Mark R. [1 ]
机构
[1] So Illinois Univ, Inst Rehabil, Behav Anal & Theory Program, Carbondale, IL 62901 USA
关键词
performance management; preference assessment; compensation; pay for performance;
D O I
10.1080/01608060802006831
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
The present study compared two variations of stimulus preference assessments: a survey in which direct service employees ranked their preferences for a variety of items, and a multiple stimulus preference assessment without replacement (MSWO), in which textual stimuli were used to represent the actual items. Results obtained for four participants revealed identical preference hierarchies across each type of stimulus preference assessment for one participant, with three participants demonstrating variations in their preference hierarchies during the MSWO when compared with the ranking survey.
引用
收藏
页码:76 / 87
页数:12
相关论文
共 13 条
[1]  
Branch S, 1999, FORTUNE, V139, P118
[2]   Evaluation of a brief multiple-stimulus preference assessment in a naturalistic context [J].
Carr, JE ;
Nicolson, AC ;
Higbee, TS .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED BEHAVIOR ANALYSIS, 2000, 33 (03) :353-357
[3]   Evaluation of a multiple-stimulus presentation format for assessing reinforcer preferences [J].
DeLeon, IG ;
Iwata, BA .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED BEHAVIOR ANALYSIS, 1996, 29 (04) :519-533
[4]  
DIXON MR, 2001, ORG CHANGE, P273
[5]   A COMPARISON OF 2 APPROACHES FOR IDENTIFYING REINFORCERS FOR PERSONS WITH SEVERE AND PROFOUND DISABILITIES [J].
FISHER, W ;
PIAZZA, CC ;
BOWMAN, LG ;
HAGOPIAN, LP ;
OWENS, JC ;
SLEVIN, I .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED BEHAVIOR ANALYSIS, 1992, 25 (02) :491-498
[6]  
Levering R, 2004, FORTUNE, V149, P56
[7]  
Levering R, 2000, FORTUNE, V141, P82
[8]   A comparison of reinforcer assessment methods: The utility of verbal and pictorial choice procedures [J].
Northup, J ;
George, T ;
Jones, K ;
Broussard, C ;
Vollmer, TR .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED BEHAVIOR ANALYSIS, 1996, 29 (02) :201-212
[9]   A PRELIMINARY COMPARISON OF REINFORCER ASSESSMENT METHODS FOR CHILDREN WITH ATTENTION-DEFICIT HYPERACTIVITY DISORDER [J].
NORTHUP, J ;
JONES, K ;
BROUSSARD, C ;
GEORGE, T .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED BEHAVIOR ANALYSIS, 1995, 28 (01) :99-100
[10]   ASSESSMENT OF STIMULUS PREFERENCE AND REINFORCER VALUE WITH PROFOUNDLY RETARDED INDIVIDUALS [J].
PACE, GM ;
IVANCIC, MT ;
EDWARDS, GL ;
IWATA, BA ;
PAGE, TJ .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED BEHAVIOR ANALYSIS, 1985, 18 (03) :249-255