Network Properties of Cancer Prognostic Gene Signatures in the Human Protein Interactome

被引:1
作者
Zhang, Jifeng [1 ,2 ]
Yan, Shoubao [1 ]
Jiang, Cheng [1 ]
Ji, Zhicheng [3 ]
Wang, Chenrun [1 ]
Tian, Weidong [2 ]
机构
[1] Huainan Normal Univ, Sch Biol Engn, Huainan 232001, Peoples R China
[2] Fudan Univ, Sch Life Sci, Inst Biostat, Shanghai 2004333, Peoples R China
[3] Johns Hopkins Univ, Dept Biostat, Bloomberg Sch Publ Hlth, Baltimore, MD 21205 USA
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
prognostic genes; prognostic genes sets; network property; human protein interactome; cancer; modules; BIOMARKERS; CENTRALITY; MUTATIONS; PATHWAYS; FEATURES; CELLS; RNAS;
D O I
10.3390/genes11030247
中图分类号
Q3 [遗传学];
学科分类号
071007 ; 090102 ;
摘要
Prognostic gene signatures are critical in cancer prognosis assessments and their pinpoint treatments. However, their network properties remain unclear. Here, we obtained nine prognostic gene sets including 1439 prognostic genes of different cancers from related publications. Four network centralities were used to examine the network properties of prognostic genes (PG) compared with other gene sets based on the Human Protein Reference Database (HPRD) and String networks. We also proposed three novel network measures for further investigating the network properties of prognostic gene sets (PGS) besides clustering coefficient. The results showed that PG did not occupy key positions in the human protein interaction network and were more similar to essential genes rather than cancer genes. However, PGS had significantly smaller intra-set distance (IAD) and inter-set distance (IED) in comparison with random sets (p-value < 0.001). Moreover, we also found that PGS tended to be distributed within network modules rather than between modules (p-value < 0.01), and the functional intersection of the modules enriched with PGS was closely related to cancer development and progression. Our research reveals the common network properties of cancer prognostic gene signatures in the human protein interactome. We argue that these are biologically meaningful and useful for understanding their molecular mechanism.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 59 条
  • [11] CLINICAL PROGNOSTIC-SIGNIFICANCE OF TUMOR ANGIOGENESIS
    CRAFT, PS
    HARRIS, AL
    [J]. ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 1994, 5 (04) : 305 - 311
  • [12] Evidence Based Selection of Housekeeping Genes
    de Jonge, Hendrik J. M.
    Fehrmann, Rudolf S. N.
    de Bont, Eveline S. J. M.
    Hofstra, Robert M. W.
    Gerbens, Frans
    Kamps, Willem A.
    de Vries, Elisabeth G. E.
    van der Zee, Ate G. J.
    Meerman, Gerard J. te
    ter Elst, Arja
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2007, 2 (09):
  • [13] Thousands of samples are needed to generate a robust gene list for predicting outcome in cancer
    Ein-Dor, L
    Zuk, O
    Domany, E
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2006, 103 (15) : 5923 - 5928
  • [14] Role of transforming growth factor beta in human cancer
    Elliott, RL
    Blobe, GC
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2005, 23 (09) : 2078 - 2093
  • [15] Human diseases through the lens of network biology
    Furlong, Laura I.
    [J]. TRENDS IN GENETICS, 2013, 29 (03) : 150 - 159
  • [16] The prognostic landscape of genes and infiltrating immune cells across human cancers
    Gentles, Andrew J.
    Newman, Aaron M.
    Liu, Chih Long
    Bratman, Scott V.
    Feng, Weiguo
    Kim, Dongkyoon
    Nair, Viswam S.
    Xu, Yue
    Khuong, Amanda
    Hoang, Chuong D.
    Diehn, Maximilian
    West, Robert B.
    Plevritis, Sylvia K.
    Alizadeh, Ash A.
    [J]. NATURE MEDICINE, 2015, 21 (08) : 938 - 945
  • [17] Development of a Prognostic Genetic Signature to Predict the Metastatic Risk Associated with Cutaneous Melanoma
    Gerami, Pedram
    Cook, Robert W.
    Wilkinson, Jeff
    Russell, Maria C.
    Dhillon, Navneet
    Amaria, Rodabe N.
    Gonzalez, Rene
    Lyle, Stephen
    Johnson, Clare E.
    Oelschlager, Kristen M.
    Jackson, Gilchrist L.
    Greisinger, Anthony J.
    Maetzold, Derek
    Delman, Keith A.
    Lawson, David H.
    Stone, John F.
    [J]. CLINICAL CANCER RESEARCH, 2015, 21 (01) : 175 - 183
  • [18] Genenames.org: the HGNC resources in 2013
    Gray, Kristian A.
    Daugherty, Louise C.
    Gordon, Susan M.
    Seal, Ruth L.
    Wright, Mathew W.
    Bruford, Elspeth A.
    [J]. NUCLEIC ACIDS RESEARCH, 2013, 41 (D1) : D545 - D552
  • [19] Hallmarks of Cancer: The Next Generation
    Hanahan, Douglas
    Weinberg, Robert A.
    [J]. CELL, 2011, 144 (05) : 646 - 674
  • [20] Harlozinska A, 2005, ANTICANCER RES, V25, P3327