Diagnostic accuracy of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration for suspected pancreatic malignancy in relation to the size of lesions

被引:91
作者
Uehara, Hiroyuki [1 ]
Ikezawa, Kenji
Kawada, Natsuko
Fukutake, Nobuyasu
Katayama, Kazuhiro
Takakura, Rena [2 ]
Takano, Yasuna [2 ]
Ishikawa, Osamu [3 ]
Takenaka, Akemi [4 ]
机构
[1] Osaka Med Ctr Canc & Cardiovasc Dis, Dept Gastroenterol, Higashinari Ku, Osaka 5378511, Japan
[2] Osaka Med Ctr Canc & Cardiovasc Dis, Dept Canc Survey, Osaka 5378511, Japan
[3] Osaka Med Ctr Canc & Cardiovasc Dis, Dept Surg, Osaka 5378511, Japan
[4] Osaka Med Ctr Canc & Cardiovasc Dis, Dept Cytol, Osaka 5378511, Japan
关键词
cytology; endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration; pancreatic cancer; pancreatic endocrine tumor; pancreatic malignancy; BIOPSY; CANCER; IMPACT; FNA; MANAGEMENT; TUMORS; CT;
D O I
10.1111/j.1440-1746.2011.06747.x
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Background and Aim: Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) is an accurate method for cytological confirmation of pancreatic malignancy, but it has been unknown whether its diagnostic accuracy for pancreatic lesions was affected by their size, location, or size of needles. Our aim was to investigate the accuracy of EUS-FNA for suspected pancreatic malignancy in relation to these factors, especially to the size of lesions. Methods: In a tertiary referral center, EUS-FNAs for 120 suspected pancreatic malignancies in 115 patients based on other imaging studies were evaluated retrospectively. Results: Overall accuracy of EUS-FNA was 96% (115/120), with sensitivity of 95% (76/80), specificity of 98% (39/40), positive predictive value of 99% (76/77), and negative predictive value of 91% (39/43). Accuracies for lesions less than 10 mm, 11-20 mm, 21-30 mm, and more than 31 mm were 96%, 95%, 96%, and 100%, respectively; those for lesions in the head, the body, and the tail of the pancreas were 96%, 95%, and 95%, respectively. Accuracies for 22-gauge and 25-gauge needle were 93% and 98%, respectively. Conclusion: EUS-FNA was accurate in the evaluation of suspected pancreatic malignancy regardless of its size, location, or size of needles. It was useful also in the confirmation of small pancreatic malignancies less than 10 mm.
引用
收藏
页码:1256 / 1261
页数:6
相关论文
共 24 条
  • [1] Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration and multidetector spiral CT in the diagnosis of pancreatic cancer
    Agarwal, B
    Abu-Hamda, E
    Molke, KL
    Correa, AM
    Ho, L
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2004, 99 (05) : 844 - 850
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2004, PATHOLOGY GENETICS T
  • [3] Diagnosis of pancreatic tumors by endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration
    Ardengh, Jose Celso
    Lopes, Cesar Vivian
    Pereira de Lima, Luiz Felipe
    de Oliveira, Juliano Rodrigues
    Venco, Filadelfio
    Santo, Giulio Cesare
    Pimenta Modena, JoseLuiz
    [J]. WORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2007, 13 (22) : 3112 - 3116
  • [4] Difficult pancreatic mass FNA: tips for success
    Binmoeller, KF
    Rathod, VD
    [J]. GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2002, 56 (04) : S86 - S91
  • [5] Brand B, 2000, SCAND J GASTROENTERO, V35, P1221
  • [6] Impact of endoscopic ultrasound with fine-needle aspiration on the surgical management of pancreatic cancer
    Cahn, M
    Chang, K
    Nguyen, P
    Butler, J
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1996, 172 (05) : 470 - 472
  • [7] CHANG KJ, 1994, AM J GASTROENTEROL, V89, P263
  • [8] Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration biopsy of patients with suspected pancreatic cancer: Diagnostic accuracy and acute and 30-day complications
    Eloubeidi, MA
    Chen, VK
    Eltoum, IA
    Jhala, D
    Chhieng, DC
    Jhala, N
    Vickers, SM
    Wilcox, CM
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2003, 98 (12) : 2663 - 2668
  • [9] Erickson RA, 2000, AM J GASTROENTEROL, V95, P2248
  • [10] Factors predicting the number of EUS-guided fine-needle passes for diagnosis of pancreatic malignancies
    Erickson, RA
    Sayage-Rabie, L
    Beissner, RS
    [J]. GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2000, 51 (02) : 184 - 190