Incidence of adverse events in paediatric procedural sedation in the emergency department: a systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:89
|
作者
Bellolio, M. Fernanda [1 ,2 ]
Puls, Henrique A. [3 ]
Anderson, Jana L. [1 ]
Gilani, Waqas I. [1 ]
Murad, M. Hassan [2 ,4 ,5 ]
Barrionuevo, Patricia [2 ,5 ]
Erwin, Patricia J. [6 ]
Wang, Zhen [2 ,5 ]
Hess, Erik P. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Mayo Clin, Dept Emergency Med, Rochester, MN 55905 USA
[2] Mayo Clin, Robert D & Patricia E Kern Ctr Sci Hlth Care Deli, Rochester, MN 55905 USA
[3] Univ Fed Ciencias Saude Porto Alegre, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil
[4] Mayo Clin, Dept Med, Div Prevent Occupat & Aerosp Med, Rochester, MN USA
[5] Mayo Clin, Dept Hlth Sci Res, Rochester, MN USA
[6] Mayo Clin Lib, Rochester, MN USA
来源
BMJ OPEN | 2016年 / 6卷 / 06期
关键词
ACCIDENT & EMERGENCY MEDICINE; OPERATING-ROOM; DOUBLE-BLIND; PARADOXICAL REACTIONS; KETAMINE SEDATION; CLINICAL POLICY; SAFETY PROFILE; ANALGESIA; PROPOFOL; CHILDREN; ETOMIDATE;
D O I
10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011384
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective and design We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the incidence of adverse events in the emergency department (ED) during procedural sedation in the paediatric population. Randomised controlled trials and observational studies from the past 10years were included. We adhere to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement. Setting ED. Participants Children. Interventions Procedural sedation. Outcomes Adverse events like vomiting, agitation, hypoxia and apnoea. Meta-analysis was performed with random-effects model and reported as incidence rates with 95% CIs. Results A total of 1177 studies were retrieved for screening and 258 were selected for full-text review. 41 studies reporting on 13883 procedural sedations in 13876 children (18years) were included. The most common adverse events (all reported per 1000 sedations) were: vomiting 55.5 (CI 45.2 to 65.8), agitation 17.9 (CI 12.2 to 23.7), hypoxia 14.8 (CI 10.2 to 19.3) and apnoea 7.1 (CI 3.2 to 11.0). The need to intervene with either bag valve mask, oral airway or positive pressure ventilation occurred in 5.0 per 1000 sedations (CI 2.3 to 7.6). The incidences of severe respiratory events were: 34 cases of laryngospasm among 8687 sedations (2.9 per 1000 sedations, CI 1.1 to 4.7; absolute rate 3.9 per 1000 sedations), 4 intubations among 9136 sedations and 0 cases of aspiration among 3326 sedations. 33 of the 34 cases of laryngospasm occurred in patients who received ketamine. Conclusions Serious adverse respiratory events are very rare in paediatric procedural sedation in the ED. Emesis and agitation are the most frequent adverse events. Hypoxia, a late indicator of respiratory depression, occurs in 1.5% of sedations. Laryngospasm, though rare, happens most frequently with ketamine. The results of this study provide quantitative risk estimates to facilitate shared decision-making, risk communication, informed consent and resource allocation in children undergoing procedural sedation in the ED.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Capnography monitoring in procedural intravenous sedation: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Askar, Houssam
    Misch, Jonathan
    Chen, Zhaozhao
    Chadha, Sagar
    Wang, Hom-Lay
    CLINICAL ORAL INVESTIGATIONS, 2020, 24 (11) : 3761 - 3770
  • [22] Paediatric procedural sedation using ketamine in a UK emergency department: a 7 year review of practice
    Kidd, L. R.
    Lyons, S. C.
    Lloyd, G.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2016, 116 (04) : 518 - 523
  • [23] Safety and efficacy of chloral hydrate for procedural sedation in paediatric ophthalmology: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Mataftsi, Asimina
    Malamaki, Paraskevi
    Prousali, Efthymia
    Riga, Paraskevi
    Lathyris, Dimitrios
    Chalvatzis, Nikolaos T.
    Haidich, Anna-Bettina
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2017, 101 (10) : 1423 - 1430
  • [24] Risk factors for sedation-related events during procedural sedation in the emergency department
    Taylor, David McD
    Bell, Anthony
    Holdgate, Anna
    MacBean, Catherine
    Truc Huynh
    Thom, Ogilvie
    Augello, Michael
    Millar, Robert
    Day, Robert
    Williams, Aled
    Ritchie, Peter
    Pasco, John
    EMERGENCY MEDICINE AUSTRALASIA, 2011, 23 (04) : 466 - 473
  • [25] Propofol for Procedural Sedation in the Emergency Department: A Qualitative Systematic Review
    Black, Emily
    Campbell, Samuel G.
    Magee, Kirk
    Zed, Peter J.
    ANNALS OF PHARMACOTHERAPY, 2013, 47 (06) : 856 - 868
  • [26] Effect of propofol-based procedural sedation on risk of adverse events in a French emergency department: a retrospective analysis
    Muller, Barbara
    Michalon, Arnaud
    Reuillard, Adrien
    Holman, Anne Marie
    Guihard, Bertrand
    Combes, Xavier
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2020, 27 (06) : 436 - 440
  • [27] Safety and efficacy of the combination of esketamine and propofol in procedural sedation/analgesia: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Huang, Xiaoci
    Lin, Fong
    Chen, Qi
    Hu, Xianwen
    MINERVA ANESTESIOLOGICA, 2023, 89 (7-8) : 680 - 689
  • [28] Paediatric procedural sedation in the emergency department: is ketamine safe?
    Jamal, Dried
    Powell, Colin
    ARCHIVES OF DISEASE IN CHILDHOOD-EDUCATION AND PRACTICE EDITION, 2021, 106 (02): : 120 - 124
  • [29] Systematic review and meta-analysis found that intranasal dexmedetomidine was a safe and effective sedative drug during paediatric procedural sedation
    Tervonen, Miikka
    Pokka, Tytti
    Kallio, Merja
    Peltoniemi, Outi
    ACTA PAEDIATRICA, 2020, 109 (10) : 2008 - 2016
  • [30] Bispectral Analysis During Procedural Sedation in the Pediatric Emergency Department
    Gamble, Carmen
    Gamble, Jon
    Seal, Rob
    Wright, R. Bruce
    Ali, Samina
    PEDIATRIC EMERGENCY CARE, 2012, 28 (10) : 1003 - 1008