Efficacy and Safety of PARP Inhibitors in Advanced or Metastatic Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

被引:13
|
作者
Liu, Xu [1 ]
Wu, Kan [2 ]
Zheng, Dan [1 ]
Luo, Chuanxu [1 ]
Fan, Yu [1 ]
Zhong, Xiaorong [1 ,3 ]
Zheng, Hong [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Sichuan Univ, West China Hosp, Clin Res Ctr Breast, Lab Mol Diag Canc, Chengdu, Peoples R China
[2] Sichuan Univ, Inst Urol, West China Hosp, Dept Urol, Chengdu, Sichuan, Peoples R China
[3] Sichuan Univ, Dept Head Neck & Mammary Gland Oncol, Canc Ctr, West China Hosp, Chengdu, Peoples R China
来源
FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY | 2021年 / 11卷
关键词
metastatic triple-negative breast cancer; PARP inhibitor; BRCA mutation; homologous recombination deficiency; efficacy; safety; MUTANT-CELLS; OLAPARIB; CARBOPLATIN; VELIPARIB; REPAIR; SUSCEPTIBILITY; MUTATIONS; SURVIVAL; SUBTYPES; PLACEBO;
D O I
10.3389/fonc.2021.742139
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: Poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors have shown promising results in metastatic triple-negative breast cancers (TNBCs). We therefore performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy and safety of this drug in patients with advanced or metastatic TNBC.</p> Methods: A systematic literature search of PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials for synonyms of "PARP inhibitors" and "breast cancer" was carried out. All published phase II/III clinical studies of PARP inhibitors in patients with advanced/metastatic TNBC were screened. Data were extracted independently by two authors and analyzed using Review Manager software version 5.3. End points include overall response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), and adverse events.</p> Results: Ten clinical trials were identified, with a total of 1,495 patients included. Pooled analyses showed that PARP inhibitors could provide a significant improvement of ORR [risk ratio (RR) = 2.00; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.14-3.50; p = 0.02) and PFS [hazard ratio (HR) = 0.68; 95%Cl, 0.59-0.77; p < 0.0001) compared to chemotherapy in the whole population. In subgroup analysis, patients with BRCA mutation had a higher objective response to PARP inhibitor, with an RR of 2.85 (95%CI, 1.34-6.06; p = 0.007) compared to BRCA wild-type patients. However, no significant difference in ORR was observed between the homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) positive and non-HRD subgroups (RR = 1.82; 95%CI, 0.81-4.08; p = 0.14). Hematological toxicity is a common adverse event of PARP inhibitors.</p> Conclusions: PARP inhibitors are effective options for the treatment of patients with advanced or metastatic TNBC. Compared with patients without germline BRCA mutation, patients with germline BRCA mutation could benefit more from PARP inhibitors. In clinical setting, hematological toxicity associated with PARP inhibitors should be monitored regularly.</p>
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Efficacy and safety of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors in triple-negative breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Zhang, Meilin
    Song, Jian
    Yang, Hongguang
    Jin, Feng
    Zheng, Ang
    ACTA ONCOLOGICA, 2022, 61 (09) : 1105 - 1115
  • [12] Immune checkpoint inhibitors addition to chemotherapy in older patients with metastatic triple-negative breast cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Pagliuca, M.
    Bencivenga, L.
    Komici, K.
    De Angelis, C.
    Caputo, R.
    Napolitano, F.
    Cianniello, D.
    Di Lauro, V.
    Rengo, G.
    De Placido, S.
    Andre, F.
    De laurentiis, M.
    ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2022, 33 (07) : S655 - S655
  • [13] Triple-negative breast cancer prevalence in Africa: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Hercules, Shawn M.
    Alnajar, Meena
    Chen, Chen
    Mladjenovic, Stefan M.
    Shipeolu, Bolade Ajarat
    Perkovic, Olga
    Pond, Greg R.
    Mbuagbaw, Lawrence
    Blenman, Kim R. M.
    Daniel, Juliet M.
    BMJ OPEN, 2022, 12 (05): : e055735
  • [14] MicroRNAs in the prognosis of triple-negative breast cancer A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Lu, Lingshuang
    Mao, Xuhua
    Shi, Peiyi
    He, Biyu
    Xu, Kun
    Zhang, Simin
    Wang, Jianming
    MEDICINE, 2017, 96 (22)
  • [15] Efficacy and safety of first-line treatment for metastatic triple-negative breast cancer: A network meta-analysis
    Shi, Mingqiang
    Li, Zhoujuan
    Shen, Guoshuang
    Wang, Tianzhuo
    Li, Jinming
    Wang, Miaozhou
    Liu, Zhen
    Zhao, Fuxing
    Ren, Dengfeng
    Zhao, Jiuda
    CANCER PATHOGENESIS AND THERAPY, 2024, 2 (02): : 81 - 90
  • [16] Efficacy and Safety of Pembrolizumab Monotherapy or Combined Therapy in Patients with Metastatic Triple-negative Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomised Controlled Trials
    Araghi, Mahmood
    Gharebakhshi, Farshad
    Faramarzi, Fatemeh
    Mafi, Alireza
    Mousavi, Tahoora
    Alimohammadi, Mina
    Soleimantabar, Hussein
    CURRENT GENE THERAPY, 2024, 25 (01) : 72 - 88
  • [17] Third-line Treatment for Metastatic Triple-negative Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis
    Shi, Mingqiang
    Li, Zhoujuan
    Wang, Tianzhuo
    Wang, Miaozhou
    Liu, Zhen
    Zhao, Fuxing
    Ren, Dengfeng
    Zhao, Jiuda
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY-CANCER CLINICAL TRIALS, 2024, 47 (02): : 91 - 98
  • [18] Immune checkpoint inhibitors as neoadjuvant therapy in early triple-negative breast cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Mittal, Niti
    Singh, Surjit
    Mittal, Rakesh
    Kaushal, Jyoti
    Kaushal, Vivek
    JOURNAL OF CANCER RESEARCH AND THERAPEUTICS, 2022, 18 (06) : 1754 - +
  • [19] A network meta-analysis on the efficacy of targeted agents in combination with chemotherapy for treatment of advanced/metastatic triple-negative breast cancer
    Ge, Long
    Tang, Yan
    Zhang, Qiu-Ning
    Tian, Jin-Hui
    Wang, Xiao-Hu
    Pieper, Dawid
    Pan, Bei
    Li, Lun
    Ling, Juan
    Bing, Zhi-Tong
    Yang, Ke-Hu
    ONCOTARGET, 2017, 8 (35) : 59539 - 59551
  • [20] Neoadjuvant therapy in triple-negative breast cancer: A systematic review and network meta-analysis
    Lin, Ying-Yi
    Gao, Hong-Fei
    Yang, Xin
    Zhu, Teng
    Zheng, Xing-xing
    Ji, Fei
    Zhang, Liu-Lu
    Yang, Ci-Qiu
    Yang, Mei
    Li, Jie-Qing
    Cheng, Min-Yi
    Wang, Kun
    BREAST, 2022, 66 : 126 - 135