Periodontal Regeneration With Enamel Matrix Derivative in Reconstructive Periodontal Therapy: A Systematic Review

被引:107
|
作者
Koop, Richard [1 ]
Merheb, Joe [1 ]
Quirynen, Marc [1 ]
机构
[1] Catholic Univ Louvain, Dept Periodontol, B-3000 Louvain, Belgium
关键词
Enamel matrix proteins; furcation defects; gingival recession; guided tissue regeneration; periodontal; INTRA-BONY DEFECTS; GUIDED TISSUE REGENERATION; CORONALLY ADVANCED FLAP; II FURCATION INVOLVEMENT; ATTACHMENT APPARATUS FORMATION; INVASIVE SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; MICROSURGICAL ACCESS FLAP; ROOT COVERAGE PROCEDURES; HISTOLOGIC EVALUATION; MEMBRANE TREATMENT;
D O I
10.1902/jop.2011.110266
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Background: Enamel matrix derivative (EMD) is commonly used in periodontal therapy. The aim of this systematic review is to give an updated answer to the question of whether the additional use of EMD in periodontal therapy is more effective compared with a control or other regenerative procedures. Methods: A literature search in MEDLINE (PubMed) for the use of EMD in periodontal treatment was performed up to May 2010. The use of EMD in treatment of intrabony defects, furcations, and recessions was evaluated. Only randomized controlled trials with >= 1 year of follow-up were included. The primary outcome variable for intrabony defects was the change in clinical attachment level (CAL), for furcations the change in horizontal furcation depth, and for recession complete root coverage. Results: After screening, 27 studies (20 for intrabony defects, one for furcation, and six for recession) were eligible for the review. A meta-analysis was performed for intrabony defects and recession. The treatment of intrabony defects with EMD showed a significant additional gain in CAL of 1.30 mm compared with open-flap debridement, EDTA, or placebo, but no significant difference compared with resorbable membranes was shown. The use of EMD in combination with a coronally advanced flap compared with a coronally advanced flap alone showed significantly more complete root coverage (odds ratio of 3.5), but compared with a connective tissue graft, the result was not significantly different. The use of EMD in furcations (2.6 +/- 1.8 mm) gave significantly more improvement in horizontal defect depth compared with resorbable membranes (1.9 +/- 1.4 mm) as shown in one study. Conclusions: In the treatment of intrabony defects, the use of EMD is superior to control treatments but as effective as resorbable membranes. The additional use of EMD with a coronally advanced flap for recession coverage will give superior results compared with a control but is as effective as a connective tissue graft. The use of EMD in furcations will give more reduction in horizontal furcation defect depth compared with resorbable membranes. J Periodontol 2012;83:707-720.
引用
收藏
页码:707 / 720
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] The effect of enamel matrix proteins on periodontal regeneration as determined by histological analyses
    Cochran, DL
    King, GN
    Schoolfield, J
    Velasquez-Plata, D
    Mellonig, JT
    Jones, A
    JOURNAL OF PERIODONTOLOGY, 2003, 74 (07) : 1043 - 1055
  • [42] Enamel Matrix Derivatives for Periodontal Regeneration: Recent Developments and Future Perspectives
    Fan, Liping
    Wu, Dan
    JOURNAL OF HEALTHCARE ENGINEERING, 2022, 2022
  • [43] Enamel matrix derivative induces matrix synthesis by cultured human periodontal fibroblast cells
    Haase, HR
    Bartold, PM
    JOURNAL OF PERIODONTOLOGY, 2001, 72 (03) : 341 - 348
  • [44] Early wound healing outcomes after regenerative periodontal surgery with enamel matrix derivatives or guided tissue regeneration: a systematic review
    Rojas, M. A.
    Marini, L.
    Pilloni, A.
    Sahrmann, P.
    BMC ORAL HEALTH, 2019, 19 (1)
  • [45] Enamel matrix derivative induces matrix synthesis in cultured periodontal fibroblast cells.
    Haase, HR
    Bartold, PM
    JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 2000, 79 : 576 - 576
  • [46] Early wound healing outcomes after regenerative periodontal surgery with enamel matrix derivatives or guided tissue regeneration: a systematic review
    M. A. Rojas
    L. Marini
    A. Pilloni
    P. Sahrmann
    BMC Oral Health, 19
  • [47] Gene profile in periodontal ligament cells and clones with enamel matrix proteins derivative
    Barkana, Idit
    Alexopoulou, Eleni
    Ziv, Shoshi
    Jacob-Hirsch, Jasmin
    Amariglio, Ninette
    Pitaru, Sandu
    Vardimon, Alexander D.
    Nemcovsky, Carlos E.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PERIODONTOLOGY, 2007, 34 (07) : 599 - 609
  • [48] Clinical safety of enamel matrix derivative (EMDOGAIN(R)) in the treatment of periodontal defects
    Zetterstrom, O
    Andersson, C
    Eriksson, L
    Fredriksson, A
    Friskopp, J
    Heden, G
    Jansson, B
    Lundgren, T
    Nilveus, R
    Olsson, A
    Renvert, S
    Salonen, L
    Sjostrom, L
    Winell, A
    Ostgren, A
    Gestrelius, S
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PERIODONTOLOGY, 1997, 24 (09) : 697 - 704
  • [49] Using Enamel Matrix Derivative to Improve Treatment Efficacy in Periodontal Furcation Defects
    Masaeli, Reza
    Zandsalimi, Kavosh
    Lotfi, Zahra
    Tayebi, Lobat
    JOURNAL OF PROSTHODONTICS-IMPLANT ESTHETIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE DENTISTRY, 2018, 27 (08): : 733 - 736
  • [50] Presence of an enamel matrix protein derivative on human teeth following periodontal surgery
    Sculean A.
    Windisch P.
    Keglevich T.
    Fabi B.
    Lundgren E.
    Lyngstadaas P.S.
    Clinical Oral Investigations, 2002, 6 (3) : 183 - 187