Periodontal Regeneration With Enamel Matrix Derivative in Reconstructive Periodontal Therapy: A Systematic Review

被引:107
作者
Koop, Richard [1 ]
Merheb, Joe [1 ]
Quirynen, Marc [1 ]
机构
[1] Catholic Univ Louvain, Dept Periodontol, B-3000 Louvain, Belgium
关键词
Enamel matrix proteins; furcation defects; gingival recession; guided tissue regeneration; periodontal; INTRA-BONY DEFECTS; GUIDED TISSUE REGENERATION; CORONALLY ADVANCED FLAP; II FURCATION INVOLVEMENT; ATTACHMENT APPARATUS FORMATION; INVASIVE SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; MICROSURGICAL ACCESS FLAP; ROOT COVERAGE PROCEDURES; HISTOLOGIC EVALUATION; MEMBRANE TREATMENT;
D O I
10.1902/jop.2011.110266
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Background: Enamel matrix derivative (EMD) is commonly used in periodontal therapy. The aim of this systematic review is to give an updated answer to the question of whether the additional use of EMD in periodontal therapy is more effective compared with a control or other regenerative procedures. Methods: A literature search in MEDLINE (PubMed) for the use of EMD in periodontal treatment was performed up to May 2010. The use of EMD in treatment of intrabony defects, furcations, and recessions was evaluated. Only randomized controlled trials with >= 1 year of follow-up were included. The primary outcome variable for intrabony defects was the change in clinical attachment level (CAL), for furcations the change in horizontal furcation depth, and for recession complete root coverage. Results: After screening, 27 studies (20 for intrabony defects, one for furcation, and six for recession) were eligible for the review. A meta-analysis was performed for intrabony defects and recession. The treatment of intrabony defects with EMD showed a significant additional gain in CAL of 1.30 mm compared with open-flap debridement, EDTA, or placebo, but no significant difference compared with resorbable membranes was shown. The use of EMD in combination with a coronally advanced flap compared with a coronally advanced flap alone showed significantly more complete root coverage (odds ratio of 3.5), but compared with a connective tissue graft, the result was not significantly different. The use of EMD in furcations (2.6 +/- 1.8 mm) gave significantly more improvement in horizontal defect depth compared with resorbable membranes (1.9 +/- 1.4 mm) as shown in one study. Conclusions: In the treatment of intrabony defects, the use of EMD is superior to control treatments but as effective as resorbable membranes. The additional use of EMD with a coronally advanced flap for recession coverage will give superior results compared with a control but is as effective as a connective tissue graft. The use of EMD in furcations will give more reduction in horizontal furcation defect depth compared with resorbable membranes. J Periodontol 2012;83:707-720.
引用
收藏
页码:707 / 720
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Biological mediators and periodontal regeneration: a review of enamel matrix proteins at the cellular and molecular levels
    Bosshardt, Dieter D.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PERIODONTOLOGY, 2008, 35 : 87 - 105
  • [32] Absorbable Collagen Membranes for Periodontal Regeneration: A Systematic Review
    Stoecklin-Wasmer, C.
    Rutjes, A. W. S.
    da Costa, B. R.
    Salvi, G. E.
    Jueni, P.
    Sculean, A.
    JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 2013, 92 (09) : 773 - 781
  • [33] Bony Defect Regeneration in Periodontitis: A Systematic Review of the Literature Regarding the Use of Enamel Matrix Derivative Proteins
    Bud, Eugen
    Pop, Silvia-Izabella
    Bud, Anamaria
    Steele, Benjamin Robert
    Vlasa, Alexandru
    DENTISTRY JOURNAL, 2025, 13 (03)
  • [34] The efficiency of the regeneration of periodontal intrabony defects in East Asians: A systematic review and pooled analysis
    Lee, Chen-Yi
    Sung, Ting
    Chang, Po-Chun
    JOURNAL OF DENTAL SCIENCES, 2023, 18 (01) : 1 - 8
  • [35] Healing of two and three wall intrabony periodontal defects following treatment with an enamel matrix derivative combined with autogenous bone
    Yilmaz, Selcuc
    Cakar, Gokser
    Yildirim, Burak
    Sculean, Anton
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PERIODONTOLOGY, 2010, 37 (06) : 544 - 550
  • [36] Enamel matrix derivative (EMDOGAIN(R)) in the treatment of intrabony periodontal defects
    Heijl, L
    Heden, G
    Svardstrom, G
    Ostgren, A
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PERIODONTOLOGY, 1997, 24 (09) : 705 - 714
  • [37] Interactions of Enamel Matrix Derivative and Biomechanical Loading in Periodontal Regenerative Healing
    Nokhbehsaim, Marjan
    Deschner, Birgit
    Bourauel, Christoph
    Reimann, Susanne
    Winter, Jochen
    Rath, Bjoern
    Jaeger, Andreas
    Jepsen, Soren
    Deschner, James
    JOURNAL OF PERIODONTOLOGY, 2011, 82 (12) : 1725 - 1734
  • [38] Bioactive glass for periodontal regeneration: a systematic review
    Motta, Chiara
    Cavagnetto, Davide
    Amoroso, Federico
    Baldi, Ileana
    Mussano, Federico
    BMC ORAL HEALTH, 2023, 23 (01)
  • [39] Treatment of intrabony periodontal defects in controlled diabetic patients with an enamel matrix derivative: a split-mouth randomized clinical trial
    Cimoes, Renata
    Santiago, Leogenes M.
    Caldas Junior, Arnaldo de Franca
    Farias Vajgel, Bruna de Carvalho
    Perussolo, Jeniffer
    Donos, Nikolaos
    CLINICAL ORAL INVESTIGATIONS, 2022, 26 (03) : 2479 - 2489
  • [40] Adjunctive Effect of Systemic Antibiotics in Regenerative/Reconstructive Periodontal Surgery-A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis
    Nibali, Luigi
    Buti, Jacopo
    Barbato, Luigi
    Cairo, Francesco
    Graziani, Filippo
    Jepsen, Soren
    ANTIBIOTICS-BASEL, 2022, 11 (01):