Periodontal Regeneration With Enamel Matrix Derivative in Reconstructive Periodontal Therapy: A Systematic Review

被引:107
作者
Koop, Richard [1 ]
Merheb, Joe [1 ]
Quirynen, Marc [1 ]
机构
[1] Catholic Univ Louvain, Dept Periodontol, B-3000 Louvain, Belgium
关键词
Enamel matrix proteins; furcation defects; gingival recession; guided tissue regeneration; periodontal; INTRA-BONY DEFECTS; GUIDED TISSUE REGENERATION; CORONALLY ADVANCED FLAP; II FURCATION INVOLVEMENT; ATTACHMENT APPARATUS FORMATION; INVASIVE SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; MICROSURGICAL ACCESS FLAP; ROOT COVERAGE PROCEDURES; HISTOLOGIC EVALUATION; MEMBRANE TREATMENT;
D O I
10.1902/jop.2011.110266
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Background: Enamel matrix derivative (EMD) is commonly used in periodontal therapy. The aim of this systematic review is to give an updated answer to the question of whether the additional use of EMD in periodontal therapy is more effective compared with a control or other regenerative procedures. Methods: A literature search in MEDLINE (PubMed) for the use of EMD in periodontal treatment was performed up to May 2010. The use of EMD in treatment of intrabony defects, furcations, and recessions was evaluated. Only randomized controlled trials with >= 1 year of follow-up were included. The primary outcome variable for intrabony defects was the change in clinical attachment level (CAL), for furcations the change in horizontal furcation depth, and for recession complete root coverage. Results: After screening, 27 studies (20 for intrabony defects, one for furcation, and six for recession) were eligible for the review. A meta-analysis was performed for intrabony defects and recession. The treatment of intrabony defects with EMD showed a significant additional gain in CAL of 1.30 mm compared with open-flap debridement, EDTA, or placebo, but no significant difference compared with resorbable membranes was shown. The use of EMD in combination with a coronally advanced flap compared with a coronally advanced flap alone showed significantly more complete root coverage (odds ratio of 3.5), but compared with a connective tissue graft, the result was not significantly different. The use of EMD in furcations (2.6 +/- 1.8 mm) gave significantly more improvement in horizontal defect depth compared with resorbable membranes (1.9 +/- 1.4 mm) as shown in one study. Conclusions: In the treatment of intrabony defects, the use of EMD is superior to control treatments but as effective as resorbable membranes. The additional use of EMD with a coronally advanced flap for recession coverage will give superior results compared with a control but is as effective as a connective tissue graft. The use of EMD in furcations will give more reduction in horizontal furcation defect depth compared with resorbable membranes. J Periodontol 2012;83:707-720.
引用
收藏
页码:707 / 720
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Effect of Enamel Matrix Derivative Liquid on Osteoblast and Periodontal Ligament Cell Proliferation and Differentiation
    Miron, Richard J.
    Chandad, Fatiha
    Buser, Daniel
    Sculean, Anton
    Cochran, David L.
    Zhang, Yufeng
    JOURNAL OF PERIODONTOLOGY, 2016, 87 (01) : 91 - 99
  • [22] Enamel Matrix Derivative, Alone or Associated With a Synthetic Bone Substitute, in the Treatment of 1-to 2-Wall Periodontal Defects
    De Leonardis, Dario
    Paolantonio, Michele
    JOURNAL OF PERIODONTOLOGY, 2013, 84 (04) : 444 - 455
  • [23] Histologic evidence of periodontal regeneration in furcation defects: a systematic review
    Laugisch, Oliver
    Cosgarea, Raluca
    Nikou, George
    Nikolidakis, Dimitris
    Donos, Nikolaos
    Salvi, Giovanni E.
    Stavropoulos, Andreas
    Jepsen, Soeren
    Sculean, Anton
    CLINICAL ORAL INVESTIGATIONS, 2019, 23 (07) : 2861 - 2906
  • [24] A Systematic Review of the Use of Growth Factors in Human Periodontal Regeneration
    Darby, Ivan B.
    Morris, Kevin H.
    JOURNAL OF PERIODONTOLOGY, 2013, 84 (04) : 465 - 476
  • [25] Apical approach in periodontal reconstructive surgery with enamel matrix derivate and enamel matrix derivate plus bone substitutes: a randomized, controlled clinical trial
    Moreno Rodriguez, Jose Antonio
    Ortiz Ruiz, Antonio Jose
    CLINICAL ORAL INVESTIGATIONS, 2022, 26 (03) : 2793 - 2805
  • [26] Enamel matrix derivative monotherapy versus combination therapy with bone grafts for periodontal intrabony defects: An updated review
    Hasuike, Akira
    Watanabe, Taito
    Hirooka, Akemu
    Arai, Shingi
    Akutagawa, Hideyasu
    Yoshinuma, Naoto
    Sato, Shuichi
    JAPANESE DENTAL SCIENCE REVIEW, 2024, 60 : 239 - 249
  • [27] Periodontal Regeneration - Furcation Defects: A Systematic Review From the AAP Regeneration Workshop
    Avila-Ortiz, Gustavo
    De Buitrago, Juan G.
    Reddy, Michael S.
    JOURNAL OF PERIODONTOLOGY, 2015, 86 (02) : S108 - S130
  • [28] Which biomaterials may promote periodontal regeneration in intrabony periodontal defects? A systematic review of preclinical studies
    Ivanovic, Aleksandar
    Nikou, George
    Miron, Richard J.
    Nikolidakis, Dimitris
    Sculean, Anton
    Dent, Med
    QUINTESSENCE INTERNATIONAL, 2014, 45 (05): : 385 - 395
  • [29] Periodontal regeneration in furcation defects - literature review
    Pereira, Sylvie Gomes
    Pinho, Monica Morado
    Almeida, Ricardo Faria
    REVISTA PORTUGUESA DE ESTOMATOLOGIA MEDICINA DENTARIA E CIRURGIA MAXILOFACIAL, 2012, 53 (02): : 123 - 132
  • [30] Quality Assessment of Systematic Reviews on Periodontal Regeneration in Humans
    Elangovan, Satheesh
    Avila-Ortiz, Gustavo
    Johnson, Georgia K.
    Karimbux, Nadeem Y.
    Allareddy, Veerasathpurush
    JOURNAL OF PERIODONTOLOGY, 2013, 84 (02) : 176 - 185