Periodontal Regeneration With Enamel Matrix Derivative in Reconstructive Periodontal Therapy: A Systematic Review

被引:107
|
作者
Koop, Richard [1 ]
Merheb, Joe [1 ]
Quirynen, Marc [1 ]
机构
[1] Catholic Univ Louvain, Dept Periodontol, B-3000 Louvain, Belgium
关键词
Enamel matrix proteins; furcation defects; gingival recession; guided tissue regeneration; periodontal; INTRA-BONY DEFECTS; GUIDED TISSUE REGENERATION; CORONALLY ADVANCED FLAP; II FURCATION INVOLVEMENT; ATTACHMENT APPARATUS FORMATION; INVASIVE SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; MICROSURGICAL ACCESS FLAP; ROOT COVERAGE PROCEDURES; HISTOLOGIC EVALUATION; MEMBRANE TREATMENT;
D O I
10.1902/jop.2011.110266
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Background: Enamel matrix derivative (EMD) is commonly used in periodontal therapy. The aim of this systematic review is to give an updated answer to the question of whether the additional use of EMD in periodontal therapy is more effective compared with a control or other regenerative procedures. Methods: A literature search in MEDLINE (PubMed) for the use of EMD in periodontal treatment was performed up to May 2010. The use of EMD in treatment of intrabony defects, furcations, and recessions was evaluated. Only randomized controlled trials with >= 1 year of follow-up were included. The primary outcome variable for intrabony defects was the change in clinical attachment level (CAL), for furcations the change in horizontal furcation depth, and for recession complete root coverage. Results: After screening, 27 studies (20 for intrabony defects, one for furcation, and six for recession) were eligible for the review. A meta-analysis was performed for intrabony defects and recession. The treatment of intrabony defects with EMD showed a significant additional gain in CAL of 1.30 mm compared with open-flap debridement, EDTA, or placebo, but no significant difference compared with resorbable membranes was shown. The use of EMD in combination with a coronally advanced flap compared with a coronally advanced flap alone showed significantly more complete root coverage (odds ratio of 3.5), but compared with a connective tissue graft, the result was not significantly different. The use of EMD in furcations (2.6 +/- 1.8 mm) gave significantly more improvement in horizontal defect depth compared with resorbable membranes (1.9 +/- 1.4 mm) as shown in one study. Conclusions: In the treatment of intrabony defects, the use of EMD is superior to control treatments but as effective as resorbable membranes. The additional use of EMD with a coronally advanced flap for recession coverage will give superior results compared with a control but is as effective as a connective tissue graft. The use of EMD in furcations will give more reduction in horizontal furcation defect depth compared with resorbable membranes. J Periodontol 2012;83:707-720.
引用
收藏
页码:707 / 720
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Evaluation of enamel matrix derivative as an adjunct to non-surgical periodontal therapy
    Gutierrez, MA
    Mellonig, JT
    Cochran, DL
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PERIODONTOLOGY, 2003, 30 (08) : 739 - 745
  • [22] Enamel Matrix Proteins and Periodontal Wound Healing and Regeneration
    Sculean, Anton
    Alessandri, Regina
    Miron, Richard
    Salvi, Giovanni E.
    Bosshardt, Dieter D.
    CLINICAL ADVANCES IN PERIODONTICS, 2011, 1 (02) : 101 - 117
  • [23] Enamel matrix protein derivatives: role in periodontal regeneration
    Rathva, Vandana J.
    CLINICAL COSMETIC AND INVESTIGATIONAL DENTISTRY, 2011, 3 : 79 - 92
  • [24] Enamel matrix derivative as adjunctive to non-surgical periodontal therapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Andrea Roccuzzo
    Jean-Claude Imber
    Alexandra Stähli
    Dimitrios Kloukos
    Giovanni E. Salvi
    Anton Sculean
    Clinical Oral Investigations, 2022, 26 : 4263 - 4280
  • [25] Enamel matrix derivative as adjunctive to non-surgical periodontal therapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Roccuzzo, Andrea
    Imber, Jean-Claude
    Stahli, Alexandra
    Kloukos, Dimitrios
    Salvi, Giovanni E.
    Sculean, Anton
    CLINICAL ORAL INVESTIGATIONS, 2022, 26 (06) : 4263 - 4280
  • [26] In vitro studies on periodontal ligament cells and enamel matrix derivative
    Gestrelius, S
    Andersson, C
    Lidstrom, D
    Hammarstrom, L
    Somerman, M
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PERIODONTOLOGY, 1997, 24 (09) : 685 - 692
  • [27] Enamel matrix derivative monotherapy versus combination therapy with bone grafts for periodontal intrabony defects: An updated review
    Hasuike, Akira
    Watanabe, Taito
    Hirooka, Akemu
    Arai, Shingi
    Akutagawa, Hideyasu
    Yoshinuma, Naoto
    Sato, Shuichi
    JAPANESE DENTAL SCIENCE REVIEW, 2024, 60 : 239 - 249
  • [28] Biological mediators and periodontal regeneration: a review of enamel matrix proteins at the cellular and molecular levels
    Bosshardt, Dieter D.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PERIODONTOLOGY, 2008, 35 : 87 - 105
  • [29] Electrospun core-shell nanofibers with encapsulated enamel matrix derivative for guided periodontal tissue regeneration
    Lam, Linda R. Wang
    Schilling, Kevin
    Romas, Stephen
    Misra, Ravi
    Zhou, Zhuang
    Caton, Jack G.
    Zhang, Xinping
    DENTAL MATERIALS JOURNAL, 2021, 40 (05) : 1208 - 1216
  • [30] The evaluation of enamel matrix derivative on subgingival microbial environment in non-surgical periodontal therapy
    Wyganowska-Swiatkowska, Marzena
    Szkaradkiewicz, Anna K.
    Karpinski, Tomasz M.
    Marcinkowski, Jerzy T.
    ANNALS OF AGRICULTURAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL MEDICINE, 2013, 20 (03) : 431 - 435