What Drives Perceived Fairness of Performance Appraisal? Exploring the Effects of Psychological Contract Fulfillment on Employees' Perceived Fairness of Performance Appraisal in US Federal Agencies

被引:45
作者
Harrington, James R. [1 ]
Lee, Ji Han [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Texas Dallas, Publ Affairs Program, Richardson, TX 75080 USA
关键词
perceived fairness of performance appraisal; psychological contract fulfillment; performance management; public human resource management (PHRM); SOCIAL-EXCHANGE; ORGANIZATIONAL JUSTICE; PUBLIC-SECTOR; EMPLOYMENT RELATIONSHIP; SATISFACTION; TURNOVER; TRUST; OBLIGATIONS; GOVERNMENT; MANAGERS;
D O I
10.1177/0091026014564071
中图分类号
F24 [劳动经济];
学科分类号
020106 ; 020207 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
While the recent literature acknowledges the importance of performance appraisal fairness in high-performing organizations, one of the major challenges facing human resource management (HRM) is establishing both an effective and a fair performance appraisal system; yet little is known about the key organizational and psychological factors that affect employees' perception of performance appraisal fairness, especially in public organizations. In regards to employees' perception of performance appraisal fairness, most studies have focused on the structural factors rather than the cognitive or psychological perspectives. Particularly, one of the key overlooked factors driving employees' perceived fairness of performance appraisal is psychological contract fulfillment, which describes the expectations between an employee and the employer and what each gives and expects in return from the other. This study examines whether psychological contract fulfillments are associated with employees' perceived fairness of performance appraisals in U.S. federal agencies. Using the Federal Employee Viewpoint Survey, this study finds that psychological contract fulfillments have a positive impact on federal employees' perceived fairness of performance appraisals.
引用
收藏
页码:214 / 238
页数:25
相关论文
共 104 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], PUBLIC POLICY ADM
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1964, Exchange and Power
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2009, APPROACHES SOCIAL RE
[4]   Dynamics of psychological contracts with work engagement and turnover intention: The influence of organizational tenure [J].
Bal, P. Matthijs ;
De Cooman, Rein ;
Mol, Stefan T. .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF WORK AND ORGANIZATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2013, 22 (01) :107-122
[5]   Psychological contract breach and work performance Is social exchange a buffer or an intensifier? [J].
Bal, P. Matthijs ;
Chiaburu, Dan S. ;
Jansen, Paul G. W. .
JOURNAL OF MANAGERIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2010, 25 (3-4) :252-273
[6]  
Berman E. M., 2003, Review of Public Personnel Administration, V23, P267, DOI [https://doi.org/10.1177/0734371x03259295, DOI 10.1177/0734371X03259295]
[7]  
Beugre C. D., 1998, MANAGING FAIRNESS OR
[8]  
Boice D.F., 1997, WORK STUDY, V46, P197, DOI 10.1108/
[9]  
Boswell W.R., 2000, HUM RESOUR DEV Q, V11, P283, DOI [DOI 10.1002/1532-1096(200023)11:3ANDLT
[10]  
283::AID-HRDQ6ANDGT