A hybrid algorithm coupling genetic programming and Nelder-Mead for topology and size optimization of trusses with static and dynamic constraints

被引:33
作者
Assimi, Hirad [1 ]
Jamali, Ali [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Guilan, Fac Mech Engn, POB 3756, Rasht, Iran
关键词
Topology optimization; Genetic programming; Nelder-Mead; Static and dynamic constraints; Truss; LEARNING-BASED OPTIMIZATION; DISCRETE DESIGN VARIABLES; FREQUENCY CONSTRAINTS; STRUCTURAL OPTIMIZATION; GRAMMATICAL EVOLUTION; SEARCH ALGORITHM; SIMPLEX-METHOD; SHAPE;
D O I
10.1016/j.eswa.2017.11.035
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Truss optimization aims to provide the lightest truss to gain the maximum benefit out of available resources. Truss optimization may subject to static and dynamic constraints. Static constraints include structural kinematic stability, maximum allowable stress in truss members, maximum allowable deflection in the truss nodes and critical buckling load. However, dynamic constraints impose limits on the natural frequency of the desired truss to avoid the destructive resonance phenomenon. Taking both static and dynamic constraints into account may lead to growth in the search space but dwindling its feasible region; the search space becomes very non-convex and may subterfuge the solver to trap in a local optimum. Another design consideration may include fabricational constraints to present design variables from a set of available cross-sections to satisfy the design codes. This paper proposes a hybrid genetic programming algorithm to deal with the barriers of this complex problem. It looks for the optimum connectivity table (among the truss nodes) and optimal cross-sectional areas for its members subject to design constraints. It also benefits from a Nelder-Mead local search operator to improve the competence and true convergence of the algorithm. Our algorithm has been applied to some numerical examples considering both types of continuous and discrete design variables; It proved its efficiency to find better solutions (lighter trusses) in comparison with other methods in the literature for most of the cases. (C) 2017 Published by Elsevier Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:127 / 141
页数:15
相关论文
共 47 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2006, PEER CENT
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2010, ENG OPTIMIZATION, DOI DOI 10.1002/9780470640425
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2003, Genetic programming IV: routine human-competitive machine intelligence
  • [4] Sizing and topology optimization of truss structures using genetic programming
    Assimi, Hirad
    Jamali, Ali
    Nariman-Zadeh, Nader
    [J]. SWARM AND EVOLUTIONARY COMPUTATION, 2017, 37 : 90 - 103
  • [5] MINIMUM-MASS TRUSS STRUCTURES WITH CONSTRAINTS ON FUNDAMENTAL NATURAL FREQUENCY
    BELLAGAMBA, L
    YANG, TY
    [J]. AIAA JOURNAL, 1981, 19 (11) : 1452 - 1458
  • [6] Branch M.A., 1998, OPTIMIZATION TOOLBOX
  • [7] A Hybrid Harmony Search algorithm for discrete sizing optimization of truss structure
    Cheng, Min-Yuan
    Prayogo, Doddy
    Wu, Yu-Wei
    Lukito, Martin Marcellinus
    [J]. AUTOMATION IN CONSTRUCTION, 2016, 69 : 21 - 33
  • [8] Design of truss-structures for minimum weight using genetic algorithms
    Deb, K
    Gulati, S
    [J]. FINITE ELEMENTS IN ANALYSIS AND DESIGN, 2001, 37 (05) : 447 - 465
  • [9] Deb K., 2001, MULTIOBJECTIVE OPTIM, V16
  • [10] Dorn W. S., 1964, J MECANIQUE, V3, P25, DOI DOI 10.1016/B978-0-08-010580-2.50008-6