Systematic inherent safety and its implementation in chlorine liquefaction process

被引:12
作者
Gao, Xiaoming [1 ]
Raman, Abdul Aziz Abdul [1 ]
Hizaddin, Hanee F. [1 ]
Buthiyappan, Archina [1 ]
Bello, Mustapha M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Malaya, Fac Engn, Dept Chem Engn, Kuala Lumpur 50603, Malaysia
关键词
Inherent safety; Chemical process safety; Fuzzy comprehensive evaluation; PDCA; Chlorine liquefaction process; FUZZY COMPREHENSIVE EVALUATION; OCCUPATIONAL-HEALTH ASSESSMENT; CHEMICAL-PROCESS ROUTES; DESIGN; RISK; TOOL; SELECTION; DECISION; STAGE; STATE;
D O I
10.1016/j.jlp.2020.104133
中图分类号
TQ [化学工业];
学科分类号
0817 ;
摘要
As a proactive safeguard, inherent safety has been regarded as the top hierarchy for loss prevention and risk management due to its salient features in eliminating or significantly reducing risks at source rather than mitigating them by add-on protections. Simultaneously, various assessment tools have been developed for ranking and selecting inherently safer designs or modifications. However, there still lacks a metric that can systematically incorporate various hazardous factors, which may hinder most industries from utilizing it to a full extent. To address this limitation, this work developed a Systematic Inherent Safety Metric (SISM) for measuring the inherently safer modifications. Firstly, the conceptual framework of SIS was proposed based on 5M1E (man, machine, material, method, measurement, and environment). Subsequently, analytic hierarchy process and fuzzy comprehensive evaluation were adapted to conduct risk identification and assessment. Finally, taking chlorine liquefaction process as a case study, the applicability and efficacy of SIS were validated based on PDCA (plan-do-check-action) cycle. The results show that the SISM value has improved from the relatively dangerous (RD) to the relatively safe (RS) after implementing SIS, thus demonstrating that the revised design is inherently safer than the base design.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 67 条
[51]  
Saaty T. L., 2008, INT J SERVICES SCI, V1, P83, DOI DOI 10.1504/IJSSCI.2008.017590
[52]   HOW TO MAKE A DECISION - THE ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS [J].
SAATY, TL .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 1990, 48 (01) :9-26
[53]   SCALING METHOD FOR PRIORITIES IN HIERARCHICAL STRUCTURES [J].
SAATY, TL .
JOURNAL OF MATHEMATICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1977, 15 (03) :234-281
[55]   Group multi-criteria design concept evaluation using combined rough set theory and fuzzy set theory [J].
Shidpour, Hesam ;
Da Cunha, Catherine ;
Bernard, Alain .
EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2016, 64 :633-644
[56]   Cleaner Production and PDCA cycle: Practical application for reducing the Cans Loss Index in a beverage company [J].
Silva, Adriana S. ;
Medeiros, Carla F. ;
Vieira, Raimundo Kennedy .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2017, 150 :324-338
[57]   A statistical approach for evaluating inherent benign-ness of chemical process routes in early design stages [J].
Srinivasan, Rajagopalan ;
Nhan, Nguyen Trong .
PROCESS SAFETY AND ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION, 2008, 86 (B3) :163-174
[58]   Recent developments towards enhancing process safety: Inherent safety and cognitive engineering [J].
Srinivasan, Rajagopalan ;
Srinivasan, Babji ;
Igbala, Mohd Umair ;
Nemet, Andreja ;
Kravanja, Zdravko .
COMPUTERS & CHEMICAL ENGINEERING, 2019, 128 :364-383
[59]   The contribution of measurement and information infrastructure to TQM success [J].
Taylor, WA ;
Wright, GH .
OMEGA-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2006, 34 (04) :372-384
[60]   OFISI, a novel optimizable inherent safety index based on fuzzy logic [J].
Vazquez, Daniel ;
Ruiz-Femenia, Ruben ;
Caballero, Jose A. .
COMPUTERS & CHEMICAL ENGINEERING, 2019, 129