Reoperation of Left Heart Valve Bioprostheses According to Age at Implantation

被引:78
作者
Chan, Vincent
Malas, Tarek
Lapierre, Harry
Boodhwani, Munir
Lam, B-Khanh
Rubens, Fraser D.
Hendry, Paul J.
Masters, Roy G.
Goldstein, William
Mesana, Thierry G.
Ruel, Marc [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Ottawa, Inst Heart, Div Cardiac Surg, Ottawa, ON K1Y 4W7, Canada
[2] Univ Ottawa, Dept Epidemiol & Community Med, Ottawa, ON K1Y 4W7, Canada
关键词
aortic valve; bioprosthesis; mitral valve; reoperation; surgery; general; PORCINE BIOPROSTHESIS; MECHANICAL PROSTHESES; CLINICAL-PERFORMANCE; 20-YEAR EXPERIENCE; AORTIC POSITION; UNITED-STATES; YOUNG-ADULTS; HANCOCK II; REPLACEMENT; OUTCOMES;
D O I
10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.110.011973
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background-Evidence supporting the use of bioprostheses for heart valve replacement in young adults is accumulating. However, reoperation data, which may help guide clinical decision making in young patients, remains poorly defined in the literature. Methods and Results-We examined the need for reoperation in 3975 patients who underwent first-time bioprosthetic aortic valve replacement (AVR) (n = 3152) or mitral valve replacement (MVR) (n = 823). There were 895 patients below the age of 60 years at bioprosthesis implant (AVR, n = 636; MVR, n = 259). The median interval to reoperation of contemporary, stented aortic bioprostheses was 7.74 years (95% CI 7.28 to 9.97 years) in patients less than 40 years, and 12.93 years (95% CI 11.10 to 15.76 years) in patients between 40 and 60 years of age. Multivariable risk factors associated with reoperation following bioprosthetic AVR include age (hazard ratio [HR] 0.94 per year, 95% CI 0.91 to 0.96, P < 0.001) and concomitant coronary artery bypass grafting (HR 0.34, 95% CI 0.11 to 0.99, P = 0.04). The median interval to reoperation of contemporary mitral bioprostheses was 8.11 years (95% CI 5.79 to 16.50 years) in patients less than 40 years, and 10.14 years (95% CI 8.64 to 11.14 years) in patients between 40 and 60 years of age. As for AVR, age (HR 0.96 per year, 95% CI 0.95 to 0.98, P < 0.001) and concomitant coronary artery bypass grafting (HR 0.55, 95% CI 0.32 to 0.93, P = 0.03) were associated with decreased reoperation risk following bioprosthetic MVR. Conclusions-These data constitute clinically relevant age-specific prognostic information regarding reoperation in young patients, who may wish to select a bioprosthesis at initial left heart valve replacement. (Circulation. 2011; 124[suppl 1]:S75-S80.)
引用
收藏
页码:S75 / S80
页数:6
相关论文
共 24 条
  • [1] Guidelines for reporting mortality and morbidity after cardiac valve interventions
    Akins, Cary W.
    Miller, D. Craig
    Turina, Marko I.
    Kouchoukos, Nicholas T.
    Blackstone, Eugene H.
    Grunkemeier, Gary L.
    Takkenberg, Johanna J. M.
    David, Tirone E.
    Butchart, Eric G.
    Adams, David H.
    Shahian, David M.
    Hagl, Siegfried
    Mayer, John E.
    Lytle, Bruce W.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2008, 135 (04) : 732 - 738
  • [2] Surgery for aortic and mitral valve disease in the United States: A trend of change in surgical practice between 1998 and 2005
    Barnett, Scott D.
    Ad, Niv
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2009, 137 (06) : 1422 - 1429
  • [3] Bonow Robert O, 2008, Circulation, V118, pe523, DOI 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.108.190748
  • [4] Isolated aortic valve replacement in North America comprising 108,687 patients in 10 years: Changes in risks, valve types, and outcomes in the Society of Thoracic Surgeons National Database
    Brown, James M.
    O'Brien, Sean M.
    Wu, Changfu
    Sikora, Jo Ann H.
    Griffith, Bartley P.
    Gammie, James S.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2009, 137 (01) : 82 - 90
  • [5] Performance of bioprostheses and mechanical prostheses assessed by composites of valve-related complications to 15 years after aortic valve replacement
    Chan, V.
    Jamieson, W. R. E.
    Germann, E.
    Chan, F.
    Miyagishima, R. T.
    Burr, L. H.
    Janusz, M. T.
    Ling, H.
    Fradet, G. J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2006, 131 (06) : 1267 - 1273
  • [6] Long-Term Clinical and Hemodynamic Performance of the Hancock II Versus the Perimount Aortic Bioprostheses
    Chan, Vincent
    Kulik, Alexander
    Tran, Anthony
    Hendry, Paul
    Masters, Roy
    Mesana, Thierry G.
    Ruel, Marc
    [J]. CIRCULATION, 2010, 122 (11) : S10 - S16
  • [7] Are stentless valves hemodynamically superior to stented valves? Long-term follow-up of a randomized trial comparing Carpentier-Edwards pericardial valve with the Toronto Stentless Porcine Valve
    Cohen, Gideon
    Zagorski, Brandon
    Christakis, George T.
    Joyner, Campbell D.
    Vincent, Jessica
    Sever, Jeri
    Harbi, Sumaya
    Feder-Elituv, Randi
    Moussa, Fuad
    Goldman, Bernard S.
    Fremes, Stephen E.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2010, 139 (04) : 848 - 859
  • [8] Which biologic valve should we select for the 45-to 65-year-old age group requiring aortic valve replacement?
    Dagenais, F
    Cartier, P
    Voisine, P
    Desaulniers, D
    Perron, J
    Baillot, R
    Raymond, G
    Métras, J
    Doyle, D
    Mathieu, P
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2005, 129 (05) : 1041 - 1049
  • [9] Hancock II Bioprosthesis for Aortic Valve Replacement: The Gold Standard of Bioprosthetic Valves Durability?
    David, Tirone E.
    Armstrong, Susan
    Maganti, Manjula
    [J]. ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY, 2010, 90 (03) : 775 - 781
  • [10] Twenty-year experience with the St. Jude Medical Biocor bioprosthesis in the aortic position
    Eichinger, Walter B.
    Hettich, Ina M.
    Ruzicka, Daniel J.
    Holper, Klaus
    Schricker, Carolin
    Bleiziffer, Sabine
    Lange, Ruediger
    [J]. ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY, 2008, 86 (04) : 1204 - 1211