Cooperation and framing effects in provision point mechanisms: Experimental evidence

被引:9
作者
Bougherara, Douadia [1 ]
Denant-Boemont, Laurent [2 ]
Masclet, David [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] INRA, SMART UMR1302, F-35000 Rennes, France
[2] Univ Rennes 1, Dept Econ, Rennes, France
[3] CIRANO, Montreal, PQ H3A 2A5, Canada
关键词
Public goods experiment; Provision point; Framing effects; THRESHOLD PUBLIC GOOD; VOLUNTARY CONTRIBUTIONS; COLD-PRICKLE; WARM-GLOW; GOODS; DECISION; BEHAVIOR; TESTS; FIELD; GAMES;
D O I
10.1016/j.ecolecon.2011.01.023
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Andreoni (1995) showed that pure framing effects may influence contribution in Voluntary Contribution Mechanisms (VCM) by comparing a standard public goods game, called the positive frame condition (giving to the public good), with a negative frame condition (taking from the public good) where the subjects' choice to purchase a private good makes the other subjects worse off. This paper aims at testing the robustness of such framing effects in the context of Provision Point Mechanisms (PPM). Our approach is original in that it combines both framing and provision point dimensions by comparing maintaining (taking from the public good) and creating (giving to the public good) contexts using Provision Point experiments. Consistent with previous findings, we find that individuals tend to be less cooperative in the maintaining frame than in the creating frame. Our results also show that the framing effects are stronger under a PPM than under a VCM and increase with the provision point level. These results may have important consequences for the management of environmental resources. (C) 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1200 / 1210
页数:11
相关论文
共 39 条